ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2455

Impact of Enthesitis on Patient Reported Outcomes and Physician Satisfaction with Treatment: Data from a Multinational Patient and Physician Survey

Ana-Maria Orbai1, Birt Julie 2, Elizabeth Holdsworth 3, Nicola Booth 4, Matthew M. Hufford 2, Malatestinic William 2, Aubrey Trevelin Sprabery 2 and Anthony Reginato 5, 1Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 2Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 3Adelphi Real World, Manchester, England, United Kingdom, 4Adelphi Real World, Bollington, United Kingdom, 5Division of Rheumatology, Providence VAMC, Associate Professor in Medicine, The Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Providence

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Enthesitis, Psoriatic arthritis, quality of life and treatment satisfaction

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Poster III: Psoriatic Arthritis, Clinical Features

Session Type: Poster Session (Tuesday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Enthesitis, a characteristic clinical feature of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) [1], is a core outcome for PsA clinical trials. While enthesitis is considered important when treating patients with PsA [2], there is limited evidence to show the impact of enthesitis on patient reported outcomes (PROs) and physician satisfaction with treatment in the real-world. The objective of this analysis is to describe the impact of enthesitis on PROs and physician satisfaction with treatment in a real-world setting.

Methods: Cross-sectional survey of rheumatologists, dermatologists, and their consulting PsA patients in Australia, Canada, EU5, and US, conducted by Adelphi from 2018-2019. Physicians assessed current presence and severity (mild, moderate, or severe) of enthesitis, overall PsA disease severity, symptoms experienced, and their satisfaction with disease control the current treatment provides (5-point Likert scale: very satisfied to very dissatisfied). Patient self-reported data included current level of pain (1-10 scale), EQ-5D, Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID12), Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Index (WPAI-SHP). Bivariate descriptive analyses were conducted to describe features and outcomes in patients with and without enthesitis.

Results: Rheumatologists (454) and dermatologists (238) provided information related to enthesitis for 3157 PsA patients with 653 patient self-completed questionnaires. Mean (SD) age was 49.2 (13.3) years, mean (SD) body mass index 26.9 (6.5), 45.9% were female and 57.4% were in full-time employment. Enthesitis was present in 6.5% (205) of PsA patients surveyed. Patients with current enthesitis had worse overall disease severity compared to patients without enthesitis (12.2% vs. 2.2% severe) [Table 1]. Patients with enthesitis had more extraarticular manifestations, including nail deformities, dactylitis, sacroiliitis and inflammatory back pain than patients without enthesitis [Table 1]. Enthesitis was associated with more pain, worse quality of life (QoL), more disability, and a greater impact on work [Table 2]. Patients with enthesitis had increase NSAID and opioid pain medication use, but similar biologic use (with enthesitis 58.5% vs. without enthesitis 58.5%, p=1.0000). Physicians were significantly less satisfied with the control the current treatment provided in patients with enthesitis vs without enthesitis (57.6% vs 84.3% satisfied, p< 0.0001).

Conclusion: PsA patients with enthesitis had more severe disease and experienced worse QoL than patients without enthesitis but were not more likely to receive advanced therapies. Physicians were significantly more dissatisfied with treatment for patients with enthesitis than those without.


Table 1

Table 1: Physician reported clinical characteristics


Table 2

Table 2: Patient reported outcomes


Disclosure: A. Orbai, Abbvie, 2, Celgene, 2, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, UCB, 5; B. Julie, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; E. Holdsworth, None; N. Booth, Adelphi Real World, 3; M. Hufford, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; M. William, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; A. Trevelin Sprabery, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; A. Reginato, Eli Lilly and Company, 5, Novartis, 5, Horizon, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Orbai A, Julie B, Holdsworth E, Booth N, Hufford M, William M, Trevelin Sprabery A, Reginato A. Impact of Enthesitis on Patient Reported Outcomes and Physician Satisfaction with Treatment: Data from a Multinational Patient and Physician Survey [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-enthesitis-on-patient-reported-outcomes-and-physician-satisfaction-with-treatment-data-from-a-multinational-patient-and-physician-survey/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-enthesitis-on-patient-reported-outcomes-and-physician-satisfaction-with-treatment-data-from-a-multinational-patient-and-physician-survey/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology