ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1129

Impact of Diuretics on Urate Lowering Therapy in Patients with Gout: Analysis of an Inception Cohort

Laura Ranieri1, Carolina Contero2, Pedro Zapater3,4 and Mariano Andrés1,5, 1Sección de Reumatología, HOSPITAL GENERAL UNIVERSITARIO DE ALICANTE, Alicante, Spain, 2Departamento de Medicina Clínica, UNIVERSIDAD MIGUEL HERNÁNDEZ, Alicante, Spain, 3Sección de Farmacología Clínica, HOSPITAL GENERAL UNIVERSITARIO DE ALICANTE, Alicante, Spain, 4Departamento de Farmacología, Pediatría y Química Orgánica, UNIVERSIDAD MIGUEL HERNÁNDEZ, Alicante, Spain, 5Departamento de Medicina Clínica, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: gout

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Diuretics have been associated with impaired response to allopurinol and refractoriness in gout, but whether this stills after new urate-lowering treatments (ULT) and treat-to-target strategies is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the diuretic therapy on the response to ULT in patients with gout.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of an inception cohort of patients with crystal-proven gout (Jan2014-Nov2016). Patients were classified according to the type of ULT received and whether they were on diuretics (loop and/or thiazide) at baseline. The last visit of follow-up was registered. The primary outcome variables were a) reduction of serum uric acid (SUA) levels from baseline; b) achievement of different SUA targets (6, 5, and 4mg/dL); and c) maximum dose of ULT employed. Clinical, laboratory and ULT-related variables were also registered. A comparative analysis was performed according to the use of diuretics, using Student’s t and chi-2 tests, stratified by the type of ULT prescribed. Also, to properly determine the influence of diuretics on gout management (maximum dose of ULT used), a multiple linear regression model was built.

Results: The inception cohort included 225 patients with an average age of 65 years (SD 14.1), 86.2% of them men, with a median duration of gout at inclusion of 4 years (p25-75 1-10) and tophi in 21.3%. Follow-up data was available from 209 patients (92.9%), with a median 9 months of follow-up (4-14). A total of 98 patients (43.6%) were on diuretics, mainly for hypertension (64.7%), heart failure (9.4%), and renal failure (5.9%). These patients were older (p<0.001), had higher rates of females (p<0.001), hypertension (p<0.001), diabetes (p=0.001), and cardiovascular disease (p<0.001), and showed higher SUA (p=0.003) and lower glomerular filtration rate (p<0.001), compared to those not on diuretics. ULT used was allopurinol in 172 patients (82.6%) and febuxostat in 34 (16.5%) – benzbromarone was excluded due to minimal use (two cases). The table shows the outcome comparison according to diuretic treatment, stratified by type of ULT. Except for a lower achievement of SUA<5 in the allopurinol subgroup, no significant differences were found in SUA reduction and targets. Contrary to febuxostat, a trend to lower maximum dose of allopurinol in those on diuretics was noted, also in the bivariate analysis (β=-37.9, p=0.053, R2=0.022); however, this association was lost after multivariate adjustment for baseline characteristics (β=-18.1, p=0.499).

Conclusion: Despite its common use, diuretics currently show no significant impact on the achievement of treatment outcomes in patients with gout.

Outcome variable

Diuretic therapy

No

Yes

p

Allopurinol (N=158)

N=92 (58.2%)

N=66 (41.8%)

SUA reduction (mg/dL), mean (SD)

3.1 (1.9)

3.2 (2.0)

0.813

SUA<6 (%)

80.6

74.2

0.337

SUA<5 (%)

60.2

43.9

0.043

SUA<4 (%)

28.0

21.2

0.334

Maximum dose (mg/day), mean (SD)

316.5 (126.9)

278.6 (121.8)

0.053

Febuxostat (N=33)

N=14 (42.4%)

N=19 (57.6%)

SUA reduction (mg/dL), mean (SD)

3.7 (3.4)

5.6 (3.1)

0.147

SUA<6 (%)

70.0

82.4

0.456

SUA<5 (%)

70.0

76.5

0.711

SUA<4 (%)

60.0

58.8

0.952

Maximum dose (mg/day), mean (SD)

80.0 (16.3)

80.0 (25.3)

0.348


Disclosure: L. Ranieri, None; C. Contero, None; P. Zapater, None; M. Andrés, Grunenthal, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ranieri L, Contero C, Zapater P, Andrés M. Impact of Diuretics on Urate Lowering Therapy in Patients with Gout: Analysis of an Inception Cohort [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-diuretics-on-urate-lowering-therapy-in-patients-with-gout-analysis-of-an-inception-cohort/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-diuretics-on-urate-lowering-therapy-in-patients-with-gout-analysis-of-an-inception-cohort/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology