ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meeting Abstracts
    • All Meetings
    • PRSYM 2026
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • Download Abstract Supplements
  • Keyword Index
  • My Favorites
    • View & print my favorites
  • Search

Home » Meeting Abstracts » ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2017

Abstract Number: 1162

Impact of Bone Localization on the Prognostic of Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis: A Monocentric Retrospective Study

Jean-Guillaume Letarouilly1, Nicolas Segaud2, Benoit Wallaert3, Pierre-Yves Hatron4 and RENE MARC FLIPO5, 1Rheumatology, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France, 2Internal medicine, Internal Medicine Departement Armentières Hospital, Armentières, France, 3Pneumology, CHRU, Lille CEDEX, France, 4Univ Lille, CHU Lille, F-59000 Lille, France, Lille, France, 5Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, CHU Teaching Hospital Lille, France., Lille, France

Share on X (Twitter) Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Email
Print

Meeting: ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2017

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Bone and prognostic factors

Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: Miscellaneous Rheumatic and Inflammatory Diseases Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare condition, and mostly affects children. Bone is the most commonly involved organ, with bone lesions in 50% of patients. In a recent work, Aricò et al. described that the probability of survival in children suffering from a multisystemic LCH with risk organ involvement was reduced if patients did not have any bony lesion. There is no such study in adult patients in order to know the bone impact on the prognosis.

Methods:

A retrospective monocentric study was performed using data from the patients hospitalized for a LCH at Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, a university hospital between 2001 and 2015. All patients with LCH and at the age of 18 years or older were included. Patients were excluded if they did not receive any osteoarticular imaging (radiography, bone scan, PET, MRI).

Results:

Our study initially included 70 patients had LCH. After screening 54 patients met the inclusion criteria :31 had bone localization (BLG) and 23 none (NBLG). The two groups showed differences. The lesion leading to the diagnosis was mostly osteoarticular (18 patients) in BLG and pulmonary (18 patients) in NBLG. The BLG presented more multisystemic form than the NBLG (20 vs 2, p<0.0001). Treatment was required for 14 patients in BLG and for 2 in NBLG. In BLG, 8 patients were treated medically, mostly by corticosteroid therapy and chemotherapy (7), one patient underwent radiotherapy. 6 patients were treated by surgery. In NBLG, 2 patients were treated by corticosteroid therapy. There was no surgery in NBLG (table 1). 3 patients died in BLG, 2 directly related to LCH and one from postoperative infectious complications. One patient died in NBLG from haematological pathology (chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia). The time between diagnosis and death was one, six and 22 months in BLG, 36 months in NBLG. 7 patients presented relapses in BLG. 5 had been treated by medical treatment, one surgically and one had no previous treatment. The time of relapse was six, 8, 12, 14, 16, 52 and 72 months. 4 presented new bone lesions, 1 pulmonary lesions, 1 dermatological lesions and 1 neurologic lesion (table 1). There was no relapse in NBLG. Unfortunately, there was a lack of statistical power to conclude about the bone impact on the prognosis.

Both groups were equivalent for comorbidities (p=0,206 for cancer and p=0,756 for cardiovascular disease), number of smokers and age at diagnosis (36.8+/- 3.0 years vs 36.7+/- 3.0 years, p=0.96 and 25 vs 22, p=0.063, respectively in the bone location group (BLG) and the no bone location group (NBLG).

Conclusion:

Patients with bone location and those with no bone location are two different phenotypes of adult LCH. Patients with bone location are more prone to have a multisystemic relapsing disease. A multicentric study with a larger number patients is needed to bring more robust data to answer about bone impact on the prognosis of adult LCH.


Disclosure: J. G. Letarouilly, None; N. Segaud, None; B. Wallaert, None; P. Y. Hatron, None; R. M. FLIPO, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Letarouilly JG, Segaud N, Wallaert B, Hatron PY, FLIPO RM. Impact of Bone Localization on the Prognostic of Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis: A Monocentric Retrospective Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-bone-localization-on-the-prognostic-of-langerhans-cell-histiocytosis-a-monocentric-retrospective-study/. Accessed .

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-bone-localization-on-the-prognostic-of-langerhans-cell-histiocytosis-a-monocentric-retrospective-study/

My Favorites

Save and print abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract (must have cookies enabled in browser). See saved favorites.

Abstract Policies

  • ACR Convergence Abstract Embargo Policies
  • ACR Convergence Abstract Permissions & Reprints
  • PRSYM Abstract Policies

ACR Convergence. Where Rheumatology Meets

ACR Convergence 2026

Join us November 6-11 in Orlando, Florida.
See Registration Information

  • Contact ACR
  • Privacy Policy
  • ACR Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2026 American College of Rheumatology