ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1162

Impact of Bone Localization on the Prognostic of Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis: A Monocentric Retrospective Study

Jean-Guillaume Letarouilly1, Nicolas Segaud2, Benoit Wallaert3, Pierre-Yves Hatron4 and RENE MARC FLIPO5, 1Rheumatology, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France, 2Internal medicine, Internal Medicine Departement Armentières Hospital, Armentières, France, 3Pneumology, CHRU, Lille CEDEX, France, 4Univ Lille, CHU Lille, F-59000 Lille, France, Lille, France, 5Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, CHU Teaching Hospital Lille, France., Lille, France

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Bone and prognostic factors

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: Miscellaneous Rheumatic and Inflammatory Diseases Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare condition, and mostly affects children. Bone is the most commonly involved organ, with bone lesions in 50% of patients. In a recent work, Aricò et al. described that the probability of survival in children suffering from a multisystemic LCH with risk organ involvement was reduced if patients did not have any bony lesion. There is no such study in adult patients in order to know the bone impact on the prognosis.

Methods:

A retrospective monocentric study was performed using data from the patients hospitalized for a LCH at Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, a university hospital between 2001 and 2015. All patients with LCH and at the age of 18 years or older were included. Patients were excluded if they did not receive any osteoarticular imaging (radiography, bone scan, PET, MRI).

Results:

Our study initially included 70 patients had LCH. After screening 54 patients met the inclusion criteria :31 had bone localization (BLG) and 23 none (NBLG). The two groups showed differences. The lesion leading to the diagnosis was mostly osteoarticular (18 patients) in BLG and pulmonary (18 patients) in NBLG. The BLG presented more multisystemic form than the NBLG (20 vs 2, p<0.0001). Treatment was required for 14 patients in BLG and for 2 in NBLG. In BLG, 8 patients were treated medically, mostly by corticosteroid therapy and chemotherapy (7), one patient underwent radiotherapy. 6 patients were treated by surgery. In NBLG, 2 patients were treated by corticosteroid therapy. There was no surgery in NBLG (table 1). 3 patients died in BLG, 2 directly related to LCH and one from postoperative infectious complications. One patient died in NBLG from haematological pathology (chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia). The time between diagnosis and death was one, six and 22 months in BLG, 36 months in NBLG. 7 patients presented relapses in BLG. 5 had been treated by medical treatment, one surgically and one had no previous treatment. The time of relapse was six, 8, 12, 14, 16, 52 and 72 months. 4 presented new bone lesions, 1 pulmonary lesions, 1 dermatological lesions and 1 neurologic lesion (table 1). There was no relapse in NBLG. Unfortunately, there was a lack of statistical power to conclude about the bone impact on the prognosis.

Both groups were equivalent for comorbidities (p=0,206 for cancer and p=0,756 for cardiovascular disease), number of smokers and age at diagnosis (36.8+/- 3.0 years vs 36.7+/- 3.0 years, p=0.96 and 25 vs 22, p=0.063, respectively in the bone location group (BLG) and the no bone location group (NBLG).

Conclusion:

Patients with bone location and those with no bone location are two different phenotypes of adult LCH. Patients with bone location are more prone to have a multisystemic relapsing disease. A multicentric study with a larger number patients is needed to bring more robust data to answer about bone impact on the prognosis of adult LCH.


Disclosure: J. G. Letarouilly, None; N. Segaud, None; B. Wallaert, None; P. Y. Hatron, None; R. M. FLIPO, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Letarouilly JG, Segaud N, Wallaert B, Hatron PY, FLIPO RM. Impact of Bone Localization on the Prognostic of Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis: A Monocentric Retrospective Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-bone-localization-on-the-prognostic-of-langerhans-cell-histiocytosis-a-monocentric-retrospective-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-bone-localization-on-the-prognostic-of-langerhans-cell-histiocytosis-a-monocentric-retrospective-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology