ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1289

Immunosuppressant Use and Gout in the Prevalent Solid Organ Transplant Population

Andrew Milgroom1, Mara Onita Lenco1, Kevin Francis1, Jeffrey D. Kent2, Brian LaMoreaux3 and Brian F. Mandell4, 1Trinity Partners, Waltham, MA, 2Medical Affairs, Horizon Pharma USA, Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 3Horizon Pharma USA, Inc, Lake Forest, IL, 4Rheumatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: cyclosporine, gout, immunosuppressants, tacrolimus and transplantation

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 22, 2018

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies – Basic and Clinical Science Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Gout is a frequent co-morbidity of solid organ transplant (SOT). Cyclosporine (CsA) is often cited as the main cause of gout in SOT, as other immunosuppressant (IS) regimens were associated with lower gout rates (e.g. 1980s studies of azathioprine monotherapy). In most guidelines & institutions, tacrolimus (TAC) has replaced CsA in SOT IS regimens. However, two questions are largely unknown: (1) to what degree is CsA still used among prevalent SOT patients? (2) can CsA fully explain high rates of gout still seen among SOT patients? This retrospective patient claims data analysis was performed to evaluate IS use and gout in the prevalent SOT population.

Methods: IS regimens and gout prevalence among prevalent SOT patients were assessed via commercial claims data (IQVIATM Real-World Data Adjudicated Claims – US). Definitions used were – SOT: claim with an SOT procedure code OR any claim with a history of SOT status code; IS: ≥1 claim for a given IS drug in the calendar year; Gout: ≥1 claim with any gout diagnosis code. IS use at time of transplant for 2016 recipients was obtained from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN).

Results: The proportion of prevalent SOT patients on CsA declined from 2012 to 2016: heart 22% to 18%, kidney 21% to 17%, lung 16% to 11%, liver 15% to 12% (all p<0.01). TAC use increased: heart 66% to 73%, kidney 67% to 74%, lung 75% to 80%, liver 77% to 82% (all p<0.01). CsA use was higher in prevalent vs. incident SOT populations (e.g. 17% vs. 1.7% kidney 2016, p<0.0001). 2016 gout prevalence was 16% vs. 8% among CsA vs. non-CsA patients. Among all SOT patients with gout, 69% and 26% were on TAC and CsA, respectively.

Conclusion: Despite declining CsA use, gout remains a problem in SOT patients. For one, this study finds that many prevalent SOT patients still receive CsA. Additionally, gout prevalence in the non-CsA population was much higher (8%) than established rates reported in the general population (e.g. 3.9%). This suggests CsA is not the sole driver of gout in SOT. In fact, this analysis finds that post SOT, more than twice as many gout sufferers are on TAC than on CsA. Physicians should be aware that with any transplant IS regimen including calcineurin inhibitors, gout is likely to remain a frequent co-morbidity of SOT.


Disclosure: A. Milgroom, Horizon Pharma, 2; M. O. Lenco, Horizon Pharma, 2; K. Francis, Horizon Pharma, 2; J. D. Kent, Horizon Pharma, 3; B. LaMoreaux, Horizon Pharma, 3; B. F. Mandell, Horizon Pharma, 2, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Milgroom A, Lenco MO, Francis K, Kent JD, LaMoreaux B, Mandell BF. Immunosuppressant Use and Gout in the Prevalent Solid Organ Transplant Population [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/immunosuppressant-use-and-gout-in-the-prevalent-solid-organ-transplant-population/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/immunosuppressant-use-and-gout-in-the-prevalent-solid-organ-transplant-population/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology