ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1212

Immunogenicity After Primary COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients with Immune-mediated Inflammatory Diseases: A Comparative Cohort Study

Kastriot Kastrati1, Daniel Mrak2, Peter Weber3, Lena Goethans3, Claudia Hana3, Elisabeth Simader2, Thomas Hummel3, Eleonora Friedberg3, Daniel Aletaha4, Michael Bonelli2 and Helga Radner2, 1Division of Rheumatology, Vienna, Austria, 2Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 3Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 4Medical University Vienna, Wien, Austria

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: autoimmune diseases, COVID-19

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2022

Title: Epidemiology and Public Health Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: Patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) are at increased risk of severe COVID-19 disease courses. Real-world data on immunogenicity are scarce but crucial to develop vaccination strategies to increase the level of protection in such patients at risk. We aimed to investigate the humoral immune response to primary vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in IMID patients as compared to healthy controls (HCs), considering the effect of disease and immunosuppressive therapy.

Methods: In this retrospective, monocentric cohort study adult ( >18 years) IMID patients, who received a primary COVID-19 vaccination, were included. Patients receiving rituximab, reported history of SARS-CoV-2 infection or antibodies against nucleocapsid were excluded. Data on disease entity, immunosuppressive therapy including steroids, and information on date and compound of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination were obtained using electronic medical records. Quantification of antibodies to the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the viral spike (S) protein (range between 0.4 and 2500.0 binding antibody units [BAU/mL]) was performed. Individuals from an ongoing prospective population-based study were included as HC. Difference in antibody levels between groups are shown as median and inter quartile range (IQR). To assess the role of the individual disease entities and immunosuppression in the anti-RBD antibody response (dependent variable), we used a multivariable linear regression model with robust standard errors to account for heteroscedasticity. The covariates of the model were selected based on previous clinical research: age (years), gender (male/female), vaccination strategy (BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or others), time since primary vaccination and concomitant corticosteroid treatment.

Results: 470 patients with IMIDs and 383 HCs were included for analyzes (for population characteristics see table 1). Overall, median levels [IQR] of antibodies were higher in individuals vaccinated with mRNA-1273 (867 BAU/ml [240, 2452]) compared to BNT162b2 (486 BAU/ml [175, 1133]), or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (190 BAU/ml [92, 504]). Patients receiving DMARD therapy showed reduced antibody levels as compared to individuals without: csDMARD only (480 BAU/ml [212, 1180]), bDMARD/tsDMARD mono- (167.50 BAU/ml [65.83, 462]), bDMARD/tsDMARD combination therapy (141.00 BAU/ml [56, 683]) versus non-immunosuppressed IMID patients (679 BAU/ml [246, 1347]) or HC (815.00 BAU/ml [479, 1532]). In the multivariable model, any immunosuppressive treatment was significantly associated with lower antibody levels. Compared to HC, only patients with connective tissue disease (CTD) had significantly impaired response to vaccination, when adjusted for age, vaccine strategy, time since vaccination and immunosuppression.

Conclusion: Immunosuppressive therapy as well as diagnosis of CTD significantly contributed to impaired humoral immune response after COVID-19 vaccination. Detection of anti-RD antibodies and early booster vaccination should be considered in these patients-at-risk.

Supporting image 1

Table 1. Patient characteristics

Supporting image 2

Table 2. Linear regression model


Disclosures: K. Kastrati, None; D. Mrak, Pfizer; P. Weber, None; L. Goethans, None; C. Hana, None; E. Simader, Boehringer-Ingelheim; T. Hummel, None; E. Friedberg, None; D. Aletaha, Novartis, SoBi, Sanofi, Amgen, Lilly, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Janssen, AbbVie; M. Bonelli, Eli Lilly; H. Radner, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kastrati K, Mrak D, Weber P, Goethans L, Hana C, Simader E, Hummel T, Friedberg E, Aletaha D, Bonelli M, Radner H. Immunogenicity After Primary COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients with Immune-mediated Inflammatory Diseases: A Comparative Cohort Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/immunogenicity-after-primary-covid-19-vaccination-in-patients-with-immune-mediated-inflammatory-diseases-a-comparative-cohort-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/immunogenicity-after-primary-covid-19-vaccination-in-patients-with-immune-mediated-inflammatory-diseases-a-comparative-cohort-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology