ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1668

Identifying Patient Perceptions of Medication Decision Making Barriers in Minorities with Lupus Nephritis

Jasvinder A. Singh1, Haiyan Qu2, Jinoos Yazdany3, W. Winn Chatham2, Maria Dall'era4 and Ricahrd Shewchuk5, 1University of Alabama and VA Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, 2University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 3Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 4Medicine/Rheumatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 5University fo Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: African-Americans, Hispanic patients, lupus nephritis and medication, SLE

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Clinical Aspects and Treatment: Biomarker, Translational and Nephritis Studies

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:  Studies suggest that adherence to medications for lupus nephritis is low.  However, there are limited data available on the barriers that patients with lupus nephritis, encounter in their decisional processes involving immunosuppressive medications. Our objective was to identify a comprehensive array of patient-reported barriers (issues) and the relative difficulty these presented for racial/ethnic minority patients with lupus nephritis in their medication adherence decision-making process.

Methods: Barriers involved in the medication decision-making process were queried and then prioritized using a voting procedure during 8 Nominal Group Technique (NGT) meetings that were convened with participants who received treatment for lupus nephritis clinics at University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) and University of California at San Francisco (UCSF). The participants were asked “What sorts of things make it hard for people to decide to take the medicines that doctors prescribe for treating their lupus kidney disease?”  We aggregated the prioritized responses from each NGT meeting by combining the same or very similar responses from different groups. The voting totals for the same or very similar responses were summed across groups.

Results: 51 patients with lupus nephritis participated in 8 NGT meetings: 26 African Americans (4 nominal groups), 13 Hispanic (2 nominal groups) and 12 Caucasian (2 nominal groups).  Patients had a mean age of 40.6 years (SD=13.3), disease duration was 11.8 years (SD=8.3), 35.3% had education level of college and beyond.  55.8% needed help with reading health materials from a family member, indicating low health literacy. The participants generated 248 responses (range=19-37 responses/meeting). Across the 8 groups, about 41% of responses were endorsed by patients as relatively more important barriers than others in their decision making process (range=32-54% of endorsed/total). More agreement about the importance of barriers was observed among Caucasian and Hispanic patients (range=32-38% endorsed) than among African American patients (41-53% endorsed). Across the 8 groups, 33 barriers were endorsed as relatively more important than others in decision-making. Overall, participants allocated about 53% of the available votes from all groups as an endorsement of importance to just 7 barriers: potential for side effects, cost, doubts about efficacy, weight gain worries, fear of damage to other organs, potential for causing other conditions, and concerns about long-term risks.

Conclusion: We found general consistency of perceived barriers to medication use in lupus nephritis patients across all groups. NGT and its robustness as a patient-centered approach helped us generate objective, semi-quantitative information regarding factors that influence the decision making process in patients with lupus nephritis. An improved understanding of patient-perceived barriers to medication use will help us design interventions and educational materials for patients with lupus nephritis (e.g., decision aid).


Disclosure:

J. A. Singh,

takeda, savient,

2,

takeda, savient, regeneron, allergan,

5;

H. Qu,
None;

J. Yazdany,
None;

W. W. Chatham,
None;

M. Dall’era,
None;

R. Shewchuk,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/identifying-patient-perceptions-of-medication-decision-making-barriers-in-minorities-with-lupus-nephritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology