ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1642

Identifying Distinct Phenotypes in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Study from the Psoriatic Arthritis Research Consortium (PARC) Cohort

Paras Karmacharya1, Daniel W. Byrne2, Alisa Stephens-Shields3, Leslie Crofford4, M. Elaine Husni5, Jose Scher6, Ethan Craig3, Robert Fitzsimmons3, Soumya Reddy7, Marina Nighat Magrey8, Jessica A Walsh9 and Alexis R Ogdie3, 1Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 2Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 3University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 4Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Melbourne, AR, 5Cleveland Clinic / Department of Rheumatic and Immunologic Diseases, Cleveland, OH, 6New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, 7NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, 8Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals, Cleveland, OH, 9Salt Lake City Veterans Affairs Health and University of Utah Health, Division of Rheumatology, Salt Lake City, UT

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Cohort Study, Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 13, 2023

Title: Abstracts: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes II: Psoriatic Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:00PM-3:30PM

Background/Purpose: Despite an increasing number of therapeutic options, less than one-third of patients with PsA achieve remission. A major cause of non-response is that PsA is studied and managed as if it were a single disease, without accounting for heterogeneity in disease presentation and prognosis. Understanding heterogeneity better can improve treatment selection, shorten exposure to suboptimal therapies, reduce potential for side effects, and improve long-term outcomes. The objective of this study was therefore to identify distinct phenotypes in PsA using the PsA Research Consortium (PARC) cohort.

Methods: Baseline disease characteristics from the multicenter PsA Research Consortium (PARC) study was used to cluster PsA patients. Variable selection was performed by clinical relevance and continuous variables were standardized. Multiple Imputation by Chained Equations (MICE) was used to impute missing values. Factor analysis of mixed data (FAMD) was applied for dimensionality and collinearity reduction, followed by hierarchical clustering on the principal components to group similar patient phenotypes. The optimal number of clusters was determined by evaluating the balance between within-cluster variance reduction and between-cluster variance reduction for each level of the hierarchical clustering tree (tree method). Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher’s exact tests were performed to examine differences in continuous and categorical variables respectively across the clusters.

Results: In this analysis of 21 clinical variables from 529 PsA patients, five distinct phenotypic clusters were identified. The baseline characteristics of the cohort are presented in Table 1. Cluster 1 (50.09%) represented patients with low disease activity, joint counts, and PROs. Cluster 2 (36.86%) displayed moderate disease activity with higher BMI and joint counts compared to Cluster 1. Cluster 3 (5.10%) was characterized by severe psoriasis, higher guttate, palmoplantar, inverse, genital psoriasis, nail dystrophy (59.26%), and the highest mean BMI (32.44 kg/m2). Cluster 4 (0.37%) exhibited dactylitis with relatively low joint counts, but worse patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Cluster 5 (7.56%) represented very high disease activity patients with the highest joint counts, BSA, and PROs (Figures 1 & 2). The proportion of females was significantly higher in the moderate/high disease activity clusters and all patients in the dactylitis cluster were females. The very high disease activity cluster had a significantly higher proportion of non-white population (15%) compared to other clusters although overall numbers were small. The clusters were significantly different across all clustering variables except axial disease, uveitis, and palmoplantar psoriasis (p >0.05).

Conclusion: The data-driven clusters identified in this real-world study highlight the extensive heterogeneity in PsA. The variability in clinical parameters across clusters underscores the need for personalized treatment approaches in PsA, accounting for unique disease features. Future studies should focus on validating these clusters in different cohorts and exploring their application in precision medicine to transform PsA treatment paradigms.

Supporting image 1

Table 1. Baseline characteristics overall and by psoriatic arthritis phenotypes in the PARC cohort.
SD, Standard Deviation; N (%), Number of patients (Percentage); BMI, body mass index; TJC, total joint count; SJC, swollen joint count; BSA, body surface area involved by psoriasis; Pt, patient; PsO, psoriasis; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; CRP, C-reactive protein

†p-values from Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher’s exact test for continuous and categorical variables respectively
*From the BASDAI questionnaire
Missing variables: race, 47 and ethnicity, 85

Supporting image 2

Figure 1. Radar chart comparison of the mean values of the continuous variables across the five phenotypic clusters of psoriatic arthritis in the PARC cohort (n=529).
Note: The variables are not standardized for better interpretability and hence on different scales plotted from 0 (lowest at the center) to maximum value for the variable (highest at the outside). Maximum value for the different variables is as follows: BMI 40, TJC 68, SJC 66, BSA 20, Enthesitis count 8 (Leeds enthesitis index + proximal plantar fascia), Dactylitis count 20, Pt pain 10, Pt global 10, and Pt fatigue 10.
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; TJC, total joint count; SJC, swollen joint count; BSA, body surface area involved by psoriasis; Pt, patient

Supporting image 3

Figure 2. Radar chart comparison of the mean percentages of the categorical variables across the five phenotypic clusters of psoriatic arthritis in the PARC cohort (n=529).
Note: The variables are plotted from 0 (lowest at the center) to 100 percent (highest at the outside).
Abbreviations: PsO, psoriasis; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; CRP, C-reactive protein


Disclosures: P. Karmacharya: None; D. Byrne: None; A. Stephens-Shields: None; L. Crofford: None; M. Husni: AbbVie, 1, 2, Amgen, 1, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 1, 2, Eli Lilly, 1, 2, Janssen, 1, 2, Novartis, 1, 2, Pfizer, 1, 2, UCB, 1, 2; J. Scher: AbbVie, 2, Janssen, 2, 5, Novartis, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Sanofi, 2, UCB, 2; E. Craig: None; R. Fitzsimmons: None; S. Reddy: AbbVie, 2, Amgen, 2, Fresenius Kabi, 2, Janssen, 2, Novartis, 2, UCB, 2; M. Magrey: AbbVie, 2, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Novartis, 2, Pfizer Inc, 2, UCB, 5; J. Walsh: AbbVie, 5, Amgen, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Janssen, 2, Merck, 5, Novartis, 2, Pfizer, 2, 5, UCB Pharma, 2; A. Ogdie: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, Celgene, 2, CorEvitas, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Gilead, 2, GSK, 2, Janssen, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Takeda, 2, UCB, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Karmacharya P, Byrne D, Stephens-Shields A, Crofford L, Husni M, Scher J, Craig E, Fitzsimmons R, Reddy S, Magrey M, Walsh J, Ogdie A. Identifying Distinct Phenotypes in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Study from the Psoriatic Arthritis Research Consortium (PARC) Cohort [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/identifying-distinct-phenotypes-in-psoriatic-arthritis-a-study-from-the-psoriatic-arthritis-research-consortium-parc-cohort/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/identifying-distinct-phenotypes-in-psoriatic-arthritis-a-study-from-the-psoriatic-arthritis-research-consortium-parc-cohort/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology