ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1829

Hyper-Responsiveness to TLR-4 Stimulation in SLE: Association with High Levels of Serum IFN-Alpha and a Distinct Inflammatory Cytokine Profile

Uma Thanarajasingam1, Mark A. Jensen2, Jessica M. Dorschner3, Danielle Vsetecka3, Shreyasee Amin4, Ashima Makol4, Floranne C. Ernste5, Thomas Osborn4, Vaidehi Chowdhary4 and Timothy B. Niewold6, 1Division of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 2Department of Immunology and Division of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 3Division of Rheumatology and Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 4Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 5Division of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, 6Rheumatology and Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: interferons and toll-like receptors, SLE

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Human Etiology and Pathogenesis - Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: IFN-alpha is a pathogenic factor in SLE. High serum interferon activity (IFN-high) marks a subgroup of SLE patients strongly associated with double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibodies. However, the pathologic differences between IFN-high patients remain largely unknown. It is likely that IFN-high versus IFN-low patients will have differences in basic disease biology and will exhibit different responses to treatment. In this study, we sought to better characterize the IFN-high and IFN-low subgroups in human SLE by studying the stimulated cytokine responses post whole blood stimulation by Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists.

Methods: SLE patients (n= 32) meeting ACR criteria for SLE and healthy controls (n=10) were recruited. Serum IFN-activity scores were calculated using the WISH assay and used to bin patients as IFN-high and IFN-low. Whole blood was dispensed into tubes coated with the TLR agonists LPS, CpG and R848 (Tru-Culture.) The stimulated IFN-alpha production was measured by WISH. Cytokine production in patient sera and after whole blood TLR stimulation was measured by bead-based multiplex assay.

Results: Of the 32 patients studied, 9 were IFN-high and 23 were IFN-low. Compared to IFN-low, IFN-high tended to be younger (27.3 versus 54.3 years), more associated elevated dsDNA titers (62.5% vs. 47.6%) and low C4 levels (62.5% vs. 13.0%). Usage of hydroxycholorquine and prednisone was similar between groups. Principal component analysis on cytokine levels in SLE patient sera identified distinct clusters according to serum IFN activity. IFN-high patients responded more dramatically to the TLR-4 agonist LPS than IFN-low (p<0.05), and controls (p=0.05). Post TLR-4 stimulation, IFN-high patients produced more CXCL9 (p=0.025), and less IL-12 (p=0.015) and VEGF (p=0.015) than IFN-low patients. In addition, post TLR-4 stimulation, VEGF and IL-1beta (p=0.0003) and VEGF/IL-12(p=0.002) were positively correlated in the IFN-high group, but not in the IFN-low group. In the IFN-low group, very different cytokine clusters emerged featuring IL-17, for example; IL-17/IL-4 (p<0.0001) and IL-17/IL-5 (p<0.0001).

Conclusion: We have observed clinical and novel biologic differences between IFN-high and low SLE subgroups. High-IFN SLE patients tend to be younger and more serologically active than their low-IFN counterparts. We demonstrate that IFN-high patients are significantly more responsive to TLR4 stimulation and produce a distinct inflammatory cytokine profile post TLR4 stimulation compared to IFN-low SLE. A recent study demonstrated that anti-dsDNA antibodies bind to TLR4 to activate the NLRP3 inflammasome in monocytes from SLE patients, and this interaction was associated with elevated IL1b and IL-17 secretion (Zhang et al. J Transl Med,2016, 14:156). Taken together with our preliminary findings, this suggests the novel possibility that the NLRP3 inflammasome is aberrantly or differentially activated in IFN-high compared to IFN-low SLE, and may offer novel insight into SLE pathogenesis and targeted treatment. Further studies directed at inflammasome activation in the context of IFN-high and IFN-low SLE are underway.


Disclosure: U. Thanarajasingam, None; M. A. Jensen, None; J. M. Dorschner, None; D. Vsetecka, None; S. Amin, None; A. Makol, None; F. C. Ernste, None; T. Osborn, None; V. Chowdhary, None; T. B. Niewold, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Thanarajasingam U, Jensen MA, Dorschner JM, Vsetecka D, Amin S, Makol A, Ernste FC, Osborn T, Chowdhary V, Niewold TB. Hyper-Responsiveness to TLR-4 Stimulation in SLE: Association with High Levels of Serum IFN-Alpha and a Distinct Inflammatory Cytokine Profile [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/hyper-responsiveness-to-tlr-4-stimulation-in-sle-association-with-high-levels-of-serum-ifn-alpha-and-a-distinct-inflammatory-cytokine-profile/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/hyper-responsiveness-to-tlr-4-stimulation-in-sle-association-with-high-levels-of-serum-ifn-alpha-and-a-distinct-inflammatory-cytokine-profile/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology