ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0595

High Satisfaction with Tele-medicine in a New York City Clinic

Tommy Chen1, Cathy Guo1, Wei Tang1, Leila Khalili1 and Anca Askanase2, 1Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, 2Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: autoimmune diseases, COVID-19, Health Services Research, Surveys, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 7, 2020

Title: Health Services Research Poster

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The face of medicine is changing with the time. A twenty-first century technological revolution in medicine happened in March 2020 as the COVID-19 pandemic reached the US. As it quickly became clear that face-to-face clinical medicine could not continue, at least not for some time, medical practices across the country were forced to offer virtual medicine encounters to the vast majority of patients. This change, while protecting patients, also had a cost that we are still trying to ameliorate. In Rheumatology, and other cognitive specialties, the physical exam is a critical component of the evaluation of patients with rheumatic diseases and the ability of current technology to allow for accurate evaluations are limited. As we are struggling to understand the correct balance between face-to-face and telemedicine over the next several months, we sought to evaluate patients’ satisfaction with telemedicine in a New York City rheumatology practice.

Methods: Questionnaires asking about the level of satisfaction with their telemedicine experience were offered to patients that had had a recent telemedicine encounter. The questionnaires asked about their experience and satisfaction with telemedicine and communication with the provider. The abstract reports these responses.

Results: Of the 100 patients, 91% were women, mean age 44.3, 25% black, 26% Hispanic, all insured, and over 90% had a diagnosis of SLE or other types of inflammatory arthritis (RA, UCTD, SS, PsA, SpA). Patients were asked how satisfied they were with telemedicine, and the results were unexpected: 84% reported high levels of satisfaction (highly satisfied or satisfied) with only 5% reporting that they were not satisfied. 86% of patients reported that they were comfortable with the new format. In 92% of patient reports, physicians were able to satisfactorily address the issues and concerns that prompted the visit. 57% of patients reported that the experiences were very similar to the in person experiences. Finally, when asked whether they would use telemedicine in the future, 77% of patients responded “yes”. See further details in the table below. None of the demographic variables correlated with satisfaction or comfort with telemedicine visits.

Conclusion: These data support a high level of patient satisfaction and comfort with telemedicine, suggesting that the transition from in person medicine to telemedicine has been successful. The balance for each subspecialty between face-to-face, when signs and symptoms need to be elicited, and telemedicine remains to be determined. Further data that comprise wider demographics, socio-economics, disease manifestations, and insurance are needed to fully understand the impact of telemedicine on patient care in Rheumatology practices.


Disclosure: T. Chen, None; C. Guo, None; W. Tang, None; L. Khalili, None; A. Askanase, Glaxo Smith Kline, 2, Astra Zeneca, 2, Janssen, 2, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, Abbvie, 5, Mallinckrodt, 2, Regeneron, 9, Pfizer, 2, Bristol Myers Squibb, 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Chen T, Guo C, Tang W, Khalili L, Askanase A. High Satisfaction with Tele-medicine in a New York City Clinic [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/high-satisfaction-with-tele-medicine-in-a-new-york-city-clinic/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/high-satisfaction-with-tele-medicine-in-a-new-york-city-clinic/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology