ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 446

High MDHAQ/RAPID3 (Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire/Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data) Scores in RA Patients Who Have Depression According to a Screening Questionnaire

Rosa Morlà1, Mariam Riad 2, Raul Castellanos-Moreira 3, Virginia Ruiz-Esquide 4, Raimon Sanmarti 5, Jose Gomez-Puerta 6, Theodore Pincus 2 and Isabel Castrejon 2, 1Rheumatology Unit, Xarxa Sanitaria Santa Tecla, Tarragona. Rheumatology, Fundacio Clinic, Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 2Division of Rheumatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, 3Rheumatology Department. Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, 4Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, 5Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 6Servei de Rheumatologia, Hospital Clinic Universtari, Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: depression and patient-reported outcome measures, Rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: RA – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster I: Risk Factors, Predictors, & Prognosis

Session Type: Poster Session (Sunday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Depression in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients may be pre-existent, amplified, or may develop after the onset of RA1. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9) is a widely-used tool to screen for depression in primary care2. A multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ)3 includes two screening queries for depression. MDHAQ also includes routine assessment patient index data (RAPID3), an index which is correlated significantly with disease activity score (DAS28) and clinical disease activity index (CDAI), and also is informative in all rheumatic diseases in which it has been studied4. We investigated possible associations of PHQ9 scores for depression with MDHAQ demographic, clinical, psychological and laboratory measures.

Methods: Consecutive patients with RA, who met EULAR/ACR 2010 criteria, completed both an MDHAQ and a PHQ9 as part of a routine rheumatology visit between November 2018 and February 2019. The 2-page MDHAQ includes 0-10 scores for physical function (FN), and visual analogue scales (VAS) for pain (PN) and patient global estimate (PATGL), compiled into 0-30 RAPID3 (≤3 =remission, 3.1-6=low, 6.1-12=moderate, and >12=high severity), 0-10 fatigue (FT) VAS, 0-48 RADAI self-report painful joint count, and 0-60 symptom checklist, which includes depression. The MDHAQ also includes 3 psychological queries in the patient-friendly HAQ format for depression, anxiety, and poor sleep quality, as well as demographic data. PHQ9 is a 9-item self-report screening tool for depression in primary care (range 0-27); PHQ9 scores ≥ 10 indicate positive screening for depression.  MDHAQ demographic, self-report clinical, psychological and laboratory variables were compared according to PHQ9 depression group, ≥10 vs < 10.

Results: 102 RA patients were included in the analysis: 82.3% were females, mean age was 58.8 years and mean formal educational level of 11.7 years. 28 patients (27.4%) had PHQ9 ≥ 10, positive for depression (Table).  PHQ9 ≥ 10 patients did not differ significantly from PHQ9 < 10 patients in age and educational level, while 96% of PHQ9 ≥ 10 patients were female (p=0.02). Patients who reported PHQ9 ≥ 10 had significantly higher scores vs those with PHQ9 < 10 for physical function, pain, PATGL, and RAPID3 (Table). High RAPID3 severity ( >12) was seen in 82% of PHQ9 ≥ 10 patients versus 34% of PHQ9 < 10 patients.  Patients with PHQ9 ≥ 10 also had significantly higher scores on the two MDHAQ depression queries vs those with PHQ9 < 10 (Table). No differences in the two groups were seen in acute phase reactants ESR and CRP or in treatment with DMARDs.  43% of patients with a PHQ9 ≥ 10 were being treated for depression vs 14% of PHQ9 < 10 patients (Table).

Conclusion: RA patients screening positively for depression according to PHQ9 have high scores for all MDHAQ, including depression scale as well as physical function, pain, RAPID3, fatigue, and others, indicating a high self-report disease burden.

References: 1. J Clin Rheumatol. 2017;23:425-434. 2. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:606-13. 3. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009;35:787-98. 4. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2017;75:93-100.


FINAL TABLE FINAL VERSION


Disclosure: R. Morlà, None; M. Riad, None; R. Castellanos-Moreira, None; V. Ruiz-Esquide, None; R. Sanmarti, None; J. Gomez-Puerta, None; T. Pincus, Helath Services, 7, Medical History Services LLC, 6, 7, 9, Medical history services LLC, 6, 7; I. Castrejon, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Morlà R, Riad M, Castellanos-Moreira R, Ruiz-Esquide V, Sanmarti R, Gomez-Puerta J, Pincus T, Castrejon I. High MDHAQ/RAPID3 (Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire/Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data) Scores in RA Patients Who Have Depression According to a Screening Questionnaire [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/high-mdhaq-rapid3-multidimensional-health-assessment-questionnaire-routine-assessment-of-patient-index-data-scores-in-ra-patients-who-have-depression-according-to-a-screening-questionnaire/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/high-mdhaq-rapid3-multidimensional-health-assessment-questionnaire-routine-assessment-of-patient-index-data-scores-in-ra-patients-who-have-depression-according-to-a-screening-questionnaire/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology