ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1681

Heart Transplantation in 6 Patients with Systemic Sclerosis and a Primary Cardiac Involvement

Alena Ikic1, Emmanuel Chatelus2, Eric Epailly3, Hélène Kremer3, Jean Sibilia2, Jacques Gottenberg4, Sabine Pattier5, Erwan Flecher6, Céline Goeminne7 and Thierry Martin1, 1Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France, 2Division of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France, 3Cardiology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France, 4Rheumatology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France, 5Cardiology, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France, 6Cardiac Surgey, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France, 7Cardiology, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Heart disease, scleroderma and transplantation

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Sclerosis, Fibrosing Syndromes and Raynaud's - Clinical Aspects and Therapeutics: Systemic Sclerosis, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Aspects

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: There is no specific treatment for primary cardiac involvement in SSc. Even if heart transplantation is an option, only 1 case have been reported1. The aim of the study was to collect data of patients with SSc and a primary cardiac involvement requiring a heart transplantation in order to establish the clinical course and expectable outcomes for this procedure.

Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients with SSc and a primary cardiac involvement requiring a heart graft in one of the major transplantation centers in France.

Results: A national survey allowed us to identify 6 patients fulfilling ACR/EULAR 2013 classification criteria for SSc. They had a history of primary cardiac involvement with an unequivocal indication for heart transplantation. 4/6 patients were women, 50% had lcSSc and 1 patient had an overlap with RA (Table 1). The median age at SSc diagnosis was 28 years and time to cardiac dysfunction diagnosis was 2.5 years. All patients had at least another systemic involvement, mostly gastrointestinal and/or musculoskeletal. Immunosuppressive treatment excluding corticosteroids has been prescribed to 3 patients.

In the year before transplantation, all patients were classified NYHA functional capacity III or IV and 5 of them required at least 1 hospitalisation. Median time from cardiac dysfunction diagnosis to transplantation was 4 years. The leading indication was heart failure requiring intravenous vasopressors except for 1 patient who was transplanted for recurrent ventricular arrhythmia. Cardiac pre-transplantation structural, functional and hemodynamic data are presented in Table 2.

The histopathology specimen of the explanted heart revealed myocardial fibrosis compatible with SSc primary cardiac involvement in all patients. Infectious complications occurred in 4 patients, 2 patients had ischemic lesions and 1 patient died from an unexplained graft failure. Median intensive care unit stay after the surgery was 22 days. During a median follow-up of 2.8 years, 4 patients had at least one acute cellular rejection, mainly of mild grade. Mild heart allograft vasculopathy occurred after a median of 2 years in 3 of 4 patients in whom coronary arteries were explored.

Conclusion: Symptomatic cardiac involvement in SSc has a bad prognosis. Heart transplantation is a relatively safe life-saving procedure in carefully chosen SSc patients with primary cardiac involvement manifesting with progressive dysfunction and/or arrhythmic complications.

Reference:

1. Martens E. Transplantation. 2012

Table 1: Patients’ characteristics

Patient

Sex

SSc subset

Age at SSc diagnosis (years)

Antibody profile

SSc diagnosis

to cardiac involvement (years)

Other systemic manifestations

Previous IS

Indication for heart transplantation

Post-op

infectious complications

Post-op ischemic complications

Post-transplantation IS (ongoing)

Post-transplantation follow-up

(years)

Acute rejection (number, intensity)

Time to allograft vasculopathy (years)

Vital status up to May 2014

1

F

DcSSc

15

Anti-Scl70+

5

Upper GI, arthritis, myositis

MMF,

CS

Recurrent ventricular tachycardia

0

0

Tacrolimus, Everolimus

0,5

No

Alive

2

F

DcSSc

12

ANA+

12

Upper + lower GI, arthritis, myositis

D-Pen

Global heart failure

5

Yes

MMF, Everolimus

3

1, severe

2

Alive

3

F

LcSSc

35

ANA+

2

Upper GI, arthritis, myositis

CS

Global heart failure

1

Yes

MMF, Tacrolimus

0,1

No

Deceased

4

H

LcSSc

46

ANA-

2

Upper GI

No

RV heart failure

1

0

MMF, CSA

10

2, mild

7

Alive

5

H

LcSSc

32

ANA-

3

Upper GI

No

Global heart failure

0

0

CSA, Everolimus

12

2, mild

10

Alive

6

F

RA overlap

24

ANA+, RF+, anti-CCP+

1

Arthritis

TCZ, MTX, CS

Global heart failure

1

0

MMF, CSA

2,5

1, mild

1

Alive

Median

28

2,5

2,75

Table 2: Cardiac structural and hemodynamic values before transplantation

Patient

LVEF (%)

LV filling pressures

RV dysfunction

MRI – Gadolinium enhancement

mPAP

(mmHg)

RAP

(mmHg)

Wegde pressure (mmHg)

PVR

(dyn x s x cm-5)

CI

(L/min/m2)

1

35

N

Yes

T1 Biventricular

7

5

5

56

1,70

2

25

↑

Yes

32

12

22

192

2,60

3

17

N

Yes

No

30

11

25

190

1,40

4

27

Yes

22

20

18

145

1,10

5

15

Yes

No

12

7

8

72

2,90

6

15

Yes

No

20

1

10

149

3,23

Median

21

21

9

14

147

2,15


Disclosure:

A. Ikic,
None;

E. Chatelus,
None;

E. Epailly,
None;

H. Kremer,
None;

J. Sibilia,
None;

J. Gottenberg,
None;

S. Pattier,
None;

E. Flecher,
None;

C. Goeminne,
None;

T. Martin,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/heart-transplantation-in-6-patients-with-systemic-sclerosis-and-a-primary-cardiac-involvement/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology