ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1971

Healthcare Utilization and Direct Medical Costs of Giant Cell Arteritis

Matthew J. Koster1, Sara J. Achenbach2, Cynthia S. Crowson2, Eric L. Matteson1, Hilal Maradit Kremers2 and Kenneth J. Warrington1, 1Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 2Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Cost containment, giant cell arteritis, population studies and utilization review

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: Vasculitis Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Title: Healthcare Utilization and Direct Medical
Costs of Giant Cell Arteritis

Background/Purpose: Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the
most common systemic vasculitis in patients aged ≥ 50 years.  Few studies
have evaluated the economic impact of this condition and have been limited to
inpatient-only data sources. Although the majority of healthcare for patients
with GCA is provided as an outpatient, utilization and costs from this
healthcare sector is largely unknown.

Methods: This study utilized a retrospective,
population-based cohort of patients diagnosed with GCA, as defined by 1990 ACR
criteria, in 1982-2009 and a reference cohort of patients without GCA matched
on age, sex, and calendar year from the same population. Standardized cost data
(inflation-adjusted to 2014 dollars) for 1987-2014 and outpatient utilization
data for 1995-2014 were obtained from the Mayo Clinic Cost Data Warehouse and
analyzed from one year before and up to five years after the GCA
diagnosis/index date.  Utilization and costs were compared between GCA and
non-GCA cohorts using signed rank two-tailed paired analyses.

Results: The GCA cohort consisted of 147 patients
(118 female, 29 male) with a mean (±SD) age of 77.2 (±8.2). The non-GCA cohort
comprised 147 patients with a mean (±SD) age of 76.9 (±8.5) years.

During the year preceding diagnosis, excess healthcare cost
related to GCA was only significantly increased in the month immediately
preceding GCA diagnosis [mean (±SD) excess cost $1127 (±5154)].  Following
diagnosis, significant annual excess outpatient cost was observed for patients
with GCA in each of the first four years [mean excess cost (±SD): 0-1 yrs $1307
(±15581), p<0.001; 1-2yrs $908 (±5917), p=0.009; 2-3 yrs $1324 (±4648),
p=0.007; 3-4 yrs $609 (±4596), p=0.04] but was similar between GCA and non-GCA
subjects in the 5th year. There were no significant differences in
inpatient costs between GCA and non-GCA subjects.

Patients with GCA had higher utilization of laboratory visit
days annually for each of the first 3 years following diagnosis, as well as
increased outpatient physician visits and combined radiology for years 0-1,
1-2, and 3-4 years (see figure). Ophthalmologic procedures/surgery were
increased for years 0-1, 1-2, and 4-5. Emergency medicine visits,
musculoskeletal and cardiovascular procedures/surgery were similar between GCA
and non-GCA groups throughout the study period.      

Conclusion: Direct medical costs were increased in
the month preceding and outpatient costs were increased in the first 4 years
following GCA diagnosis and then return to levels similar to non-GCA subjects.
A higher utilization of outpatient physician, laboratory and radiology visits,
as well as ophthalmologic procedures among these patients accounts for the
observed increased cost of care.


Disclosure: M. J. Koster, None; S. J. Achenbach, None; C. S. Crowson, None; E. L. Matteson, Novartis/Sanofi/Centocor-Jansen/Celgene/Amgen/Roche/Genentech/Mesoblast/Pfizer, 2; H. Maradit Kremers, None; K. J. Warrington, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Koster MJ, Achenbach SJ, Crowson CS, Matteson EL, Maradit Kremers H, Warrington KJ. Healthcare Utilization and Direct Medical Costs of Giant Cell Arteritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/healthcare-utilization-and-direct-medical-costs-of-giant-cell-arteritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/healthcare-utilization-and-direct-medical-costs-of-giant-cell-arteritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology