ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0045

Healthcare Practitioner Confidence Assessing Rashes in Patients of Skin of Color with Lupus

Vijay Kannuthurai1, Jacob Murray2, Lisa Zickuhr3 and Ling Chen2, 1Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, Hazlehurst, MS, 2Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 3Washington University/B-JH/SLCH Consortium, St. Louis, MO

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Disparities, education, medical, race/ethnicity, Surveys, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Friday, November 6, 2020

Title: Healthcare Disparities in Rheumatology Poster

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Medical education can promote bias that disproportionately affects patients of color. Patients of color with lupus are especially vulnerable as they often carry a greater disease burden, yet studies show that individuals with darker skin tones are underrepresented in medical educational materials. Given this disparity, we surveyed practitioners’ confidence assessing rashes in patients with lupus and skin of color (SOC) and identified factors that may influence confidence.

Methods: We designed a survey to collect demographic information and measure providers’ confidence assessing any rash and rashes in patients with lupus and varied skin tones. We invited providers in the Greater St. Louis Area to participate, distributing surveys in person and via Qualtrics. For our primary outcome, we compared Likert scores for providers’ confidence assessing rashes in patients with lupus and SOC with least square means and pairwise differences. To identify variables that correlate with practitioners’ confidence, we created univariate linear models and multivariate generalized linear models using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients and backward selection. We set statistical significance at p< 0.05 for all analyses.

Results: In total, 132 providers participated (Table 1). The mean confidence level diagnosing any rash was significantly higher than diagnosing lupus rashes, including in patients with fair skin and SOC (p=0.03; 0.049; < 0.0001). The mean confidence diagnosing lupus rashes in patients with fair skin was also significantly higher than confidence diagnosing lupus rashes in patients with SOC (p=0.0090). Mean confidence levels for each specialty were collected (Table 2). Univariate analysis found that provider specialty, years in practice, extent of training, experience in diagnosing, and frequency of treating white or African American patients correlated with confidence level diagnosing lupus rashes in patients of color. However, in the final multivariate model, only practitioners’ self-reported experience level diagnosing rashes in patients with lupus and SOC correlated with their confidence doing the same (p=< 0.001). Lastly, 92% of participants indicated interest in education about lupus rashes and 93% wanted to learn about rashes in patients of color.

Conclusion: Healthcare providers are less confident evaluating lupus-related rashes in SOC compared to fair skin, representing a disparity between provider confidence and the patient population lupus traditionally affects. While our univariate model demonstrated correlations among confidence in diagnosing rashes in patients with lupus and SOC and several factors, the multivariate model revealed a relationship between confidence and experience alone. Based upon the principle of collinearity, we believe specialty, years in practice, extent of training, and frequency of treating different ethnicities may all contribute to provider experience level. Training is unique as it can be modified immediately. Over 90% of participants were interested in education on this topic. Future educational interventions may help practitioners improve their confidence when diagnosing rashes in lupus patients with SOC.

Characteristics of Participants at Baseline

Distribution of provider characteristics regarding extent of training, experience in diagnosing, and confidence diagnosing rashes as a function of provider specialty training


Disclosure: V. Kannuthurai, None; J. Murray, None; L. Zickuhr, None; L. Chen, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kannuthurai V, Murray J, Zickuhr L, Chen L. Healthcare Practitioner Confidence Assessing Rashes in Patients of Skin of Color with Lupus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/healthcare-practitioner-confidence-assessing-rashes-in-patients-of-skin-of-color-with-lupus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/healthcare-practitioner-confidence-assessing-rashes-in-patients-of-skin-of-color-with-lupus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology