ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1263

Health Literacy diversity among rheumatology patients: insights from a tertiary rheumatology centre

Cristina Calomarde-Gomez1, Mrinalini Dey2, Chris Wincup3, María Alonso de Francisco4, Christina Cheng5, Richard Osborne5 and Elena Nikiphorou6, 1Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain, 2Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College London, London, United Kingdom, 3King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom, 4H. U. Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Tres Cantos, Spain, 5La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 6King's College London, London, United Kingdom

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Demographics, Disparities, education, patient, Health Services Research, socioeconomic factors

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 27, 2025

Title: (1248–1271) Patient Outcomes, Preferences, & Attitudes Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Health literacy is a potential social determinant of health, fundamental to patient engagement, clinical communication, and long-term outcomes of disease. Understanding health literacy at the individual and population levels are essential to drive equitable, person-centered healthcare.We aimed to identify and describe health literacy profiles in people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) attending a tertiary rheumatology service.

Methods: Patients attending the rheumatology clinic at King’s College Hospital, UK, were invited to complete a survey including the nine-domain Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ), socio-demographic and clinical characteristics. Hierarchical cluster analysis, following the Ophelia (Optimising Health Literacy and Access) process (1) was conducted to identify patient subgroups based on the nine HLQ domains and other characteristics.

Results: In total, 263 people with RMDs were included in this study. Eleven distinct clinically relevant clusters were identified (Table 1). Clusters 1 (10%) and 2 (9%) exhibited high scores across all HLQ domains, with strong engagement, navigation, and comprehension capabilities. These clusters comprised mainly professionally employed women, with Cluster 1 younger patients (mean 32.8 years) with connective tissue diseases (CTD) and cluster 2 including older patients (mean 55.5 years) with inflammatory arthritis (IA).Cluster 3 (6%) showed high engagement with limited emotional support. Most were men working in technical or professional roles. Clusters 5 (10%), 6 (15%), 8 (8%), and 9 (12%) showed mixed profiles. For instance, Cluster 5, predominantly women, demonstrated strong information-processing skills but only moderate social support. Cluster 8 had adequate comprehension despite poor support.Cluster 6 (15%) represented a younger, ethnically diverse group with moderate comprehension, limited support, and high unemployment. Cluster 7 (17%) consisted mainly of older, predominantly white, retired individuals with average literacy levels and low provider engagement. Clusters 10 (2%) and 11 (3%) reflected the most complex challenges. Cluster 10 revealed a distinct profile of strong self-management despite extremely low support and engagement; members were mostly female, technically trained, and unemployed. Cluster 11, with the lowest scores across all domains, included older, professionally inactive women.

Conclusion: Health literacy among patients at King’s College Hospital Rheumatology Clinic is highly variable, with some groups facing substantial barriers to engagement and support. Notable patterns emerged, such as higher health literacy amongst older patients with IA and younger patients with CTD, while lower health literacy in certain domains was associated with unemployment and non-Caucasian ethnicity. Identifying health literacy profiles can support more targeted and equitable approaches to patient communication, care planning, and service design.Reference1. Osborne R et al. The Ophelia Manual. The Optimising Health Literacy and Access process to plan and implement National Health Literacy Demonstration Projects.

Supporting image 1Table 1: Cluster analysis of Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) data from 263 patients attending the rheumatology clinic at King’s College Hospital. HLQ1 (Feeling understood and supported by health care providers), HLQ2 (Having sufficient information to manage my health), HLQ3 (Actively managing my health), HLQ4 (Social support for health), HLQ5 (Appraisal of health information), HLQ6 (Ability to actively engage with healthcare providers), HLQ7 (Navigating the healthcare system), HLQ8 (Ability to find good health information), HLQ9 (Understand health information well enough to know what to do).

Supporting image 2Figure 1: Infographic summarising characteristics of individuals within each of the described clústers, including health literacy strengths and needs.


Disclosures: C. Calomarde-Gomez: None; M. Dey: None; C. Wincup: None; M. Alonso de Francisco: None; C. Cheng: None; R. Osborne: None; E. Nikiphorou: AbbVie/Abbott, 1, 2, 6, Alfasigma, 1, 6, Eli Lilly, 1, 2, 5, 6, Fresenius, 1, 6, Galapagos, 1, 6, Gilead, 1, 6, Novartis, 1, 2, 6, Pfizer, 1, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 1, 2, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Calomarde-Gomez C, Dey M, Wincup C, Alonso de Francisco M, Cheng C, Osborne R, Nikiphorou E. Health Literacy diversity among rheumatology patients: insights from a tertiary rheumatology centre [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/health-literacy-diversity-among-rheumatology-patients-insights-from-a-tertiary-rheumatology-centre/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/health-literacy-diversity-among-rheumatology-patients-insights-from-a-tertiary-rheumatology-centre/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology