ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1086

Has the Level of Disability At Time of TKR Changed Over the Past 10 Years?: Results From Two National Cohorts

Patricia D. Franklin1, Wenjun Li1, Benjamin Snyder2, Courtland Lewis3, Philip Noble4 and David Ayers1, 1Orthopedics and Physical Rehabilitation, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, 2Orthopedics, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, 3CT Joint Replacement Institute, St. Francis Hospital, Hartford, CT, 4Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Orthopedics, outcome measures and total joint replacement

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Orthopedics, Low Back Pain, and Rehabilitation

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: A growing numbers of younger adults report knee pain consistent with OA, although parallel analyses of knee x-rays show no increase in classic radiographic signs of OA. To evaluate whether surgeons are performing TKR at an earlier stage in the condition, we compared pre-operative demographic and symptom profiles from 2 national cohorts of TKR patients, one from 2011-2012 and another from 2000-2004.

Methods: Following informed consent, we collected comprehensive demographic, comorbidity, and patient-reported pain and physical function from a national sample of 2011-12 TKR patients, across 27 states with 89 surgeons. Comparable data collected by one implant manufacturer between 2000-2004 from 136 surgeons in 31 states were analyzed. Descriptive statistics compared the demographic and symptom profiles of the two cohorts.

Results: There were minimal differences between the two cohorts in terms of age (2011-12: 66.5 years, vs. 2000/4: 67.6 years; p0.05). The more recent patient cohort consisted of fewer females (57%) compared to the earlier group (66%). Pre-operative physical function scores (SF36/PCS) were 3 points higher in 2011-12 than 2000-04 (33.6±0.3 vs. 30.3±0.1; p<0.0000). The 2000-2004 cohort (n=7686) had a mean BMI of 32 vs 31.7 for the 2011-12 cohort (n=1362). When compared to the national PCS norm of 50 (SD=10), TKR patients from both time periods reported pre-operative function levels almost 2 standard deviations below the national norm.

Conclusion: The profile of primary TKR patients changed between 2000-04, and 2011-12. Today, patients are younger and have a higher pre-operative physical function scores. They continue to report significant levels of disability with mean pre-TKR PCS significantly lower than average OA patients.


Disclosure:

P. D. Franklin,

Zimmer, Inc.,

2;

W. Li,
None;

B. Snyder,
None;

C. Lewis,
None;

P. Noble,

Zimmer;,Stryker,Omni,SN,

7;

D. Ayers,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/has-the-level-of-disability-at-time-of-tkr-changed-over-the-past-10-years-results-from-two-national-cohorts/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology