ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2236

Guselkumab Provides Rapid Clinically Meaningful Improvements in Clinical and Patient Reported Outcomes and Sustained Disease Control of Psoriatic Arthritis

Jeffrey R Curtis1, Atul Deodhar2, Enrique Soriano3, Emmanouil Rampakakis4, May Shawi5, Natalie shiff6, Marcie Strauss7, Chenglong Han8, William R Tillett9 and Dafna Gladman10, 1Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, 2Division of Arthritis and Rheumatic Disease, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 3Rheumatology Section, Internal Medicine Services, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, and University Institute Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 4McGill University, Department of Pediatrics / JSS Medical Research, Scientific Affairs, Montreal, QC, Canada, 5Immunology, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Titusville, NJ, 6Immunology, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC / Adjunct, Community Health and Epidemiology, University of Saskatchewan, Horsham, PA, 7MEDASOURCE, Medical Group, Indianapolis, IN, 8Immunology, Janssen Global Services, LLC, Malvern, PA, 9Department of Rheumatology, Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Bath, United Kingdom, 10Schroeder Arthritis Institute, Krembil Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Disease Activity, Patient reported outcomes, Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Title: (2227–2256) Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment: SpA Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Guselkumab (GUS) has demonstrated robust efficacy across key PsA domains at Week (W) 24, with effects sustained or further enhanced through 2 years. Timing of clinically meaningful improvement in disease activity (DA), functional status, and health-related quality of life is of interest to PsA patients (pts) and providers. Here we 1) evaluated effect of GUS on time to minimal clinically important improvements (MCII) in pt reported outcomes and composite measures of DA; 2) assessed association between W4/W8 MCII achievement and later disease control (W24/W52).

Methods: This post hoc analysis evaluated 1120 adults with active PsA despite standard therapies from DISCOVER-1 (D1) (swollen & tender joint counts [SJC/TJC] ≥3 each, CRP ≥0.3 mg/dL, 1-2 prior TNF inhibitors [TNFi] in 31% of pts) and D2 (SJC/TJC ≥5 each, CRP ≥0.6 mg/dL, biologic-naïve). Pts were randomized 1:1:1 to GUS 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W); GUS 100 mg at W0, W4, then Q8W; or placebo (PBO)®GUS 100 mg Q4W at W24. Time to MCII in outcomes of interest, i.e., improvement in clinical DA Index for PsA (cDAPSA) ≥5.7, Joint Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ≥15mm, Pt Pain ≥15mm, HAQ-DI ≥0.35, PsA DA Score (PASDAS) ≥0.8, Pt Global Assessment (PtGA) ≥15mm, Skin VAS ≥15mm, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue (FACIT-F) ≥4, Short Form (SF)-36 physical component summary (PCS) ≥5, was compared between GUS vs PBO with Cox regression adjusting for baseline (BL) levels of respective outcome, treatment group, prior TNFi use, and BL DMARD use. MCII achievement was determined using non-responder imputation and compared between GUS and PBO using logistic regression adjusting for the above covariates. The association between MCII achievement at W4/W8 and stringent clinical response at W24/W52 amongst GUS-treated pts was assessed with logistic regression adjusting for prior TNFi use and BL DMARD use.

Results: Time to achieve MCII in all studied outcomes was significantly shorter (hazard ratio range: 1.3-2.5; all p< 0.01) for both GUS Q4W and Q8W vs PBO, including cDAPSA as a representative example (Figure), with curve separation occurring at the first timepoint assessed. MCII rates also were significantly higher with GUS vs PBO at the first timepoint assessed, i.e., W4 for cDAPSA, Joint VAS, Pt Pain, and HAQ-DI and W8 for PASDAS, PtGA, Skin VAS, FACIT-F, and SF-36 PCS (Table). W4 achievement of MCII in cDAPSA, Joint VAS, Pt Pain, and HAQ-DI was associated with greater odds of achieving future disease control, defined as ACR50, ACR70, cDAPSA ≤13, PASDAS ≤3.2, and minimal DA (MDA), at W24 (odds ratio [OR]: 1.5-3.6) and W52 (OR: 1.2-2.4). W8 achievement of MCII in all studied outcomes was also associated with greater odds of achieving disease control at W24 (OR: 1.4-17.2) and W52 (OR: 1.2-5.4).

Conclusion: In pts with active PsA, treatment with GUS was associated with more rapid MCII in both clinical and pt reported outcomes compared with PBO. As early as W4, achievement of MCII vs non-achievement in each studied outcome, particularly PASDAS and cDAPSA, was associated with greater odds of longer-term stringent DA control. Findings highlight the impact of these rapid improvements with GUS (as early as W4) on the trajectory of long-term pt outcomes.

Supporting image 1

Figure. Time to MCII in cDAPSA (Δ ≤ -5.7) Through W24

Supporting image 2

Table. Proportions of Pts Achieving MCII


Disclosures: J. Curtis: AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, BMS, 2, 5, Corrona, 2, 5, Crescendo, 2, 5, Genentech, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Roche, 2, 5, UCB Pharma, 2, 5; A. Deodhar: AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, Aurinia, 2, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Celgene, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 6, MoonLake, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 5; E. Soriano: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 6, Eli Lilly, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 5, 6, Roche, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 5, 6; E. Rampakakis: Janssen, 2, JSS Medical Research, Inc, 3; M. Shawi: Immunology Global Medical Affairs, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 11; N. shiff: AbbVie, 11, Gilead, 11, Iovance, 11, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 11, Novo-Nordisc, 11, Pfizer, 11; M. Strauss: Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 2, MEDASOURCE, 3; C. Han: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 11; W. Tillett: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Celgene, 2, 5, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 6, GSK, 2, 5, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, MSD, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Ovo Pharma, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, UCB Pharma, 2, 5, 6; D. Gladman: AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, Celgene, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Galapagos, 2, Gilead Sciences, 2, Janssen, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Curtis J, Deodhar A, Soriano E, Rampakakis E, Shawi M, shiff N, Strauss M, Han C, Tillett W, Gladman D. Guselkumab Provides Rapid Clinically Meaningful Improvements in Clinical and Patient Reported Outcomes and Sustained Disease Control of Psoriatic Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/guselkumab-provides-rapid-clinically-meaningful-improvements-in-clinical-and-patient-reported-outcomes-and-sustained-disease-control-of-psoriatic-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/guselkumab-provides-rapid-clinically-meaningful-improvements-in-clinical-and-patient-reported-outcomes-and-sustained-disease-control-of-psoriatic-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology