ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0680

Gout Stigma: Investigating the Existence of Gout Stigma and Its Impact on Patient Perceptions and Treatment Decisions

N Lawrence Edwards1, Brian LaMoreaux2, Joseph Vitriol3 and Adam Magerman3, 1University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, 2Horizon Therapeutics plc, Deerfield, IL, 3Horizon Therapeutics, Deerfield, IL

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: gout, Pegloticase, Perceptions, Stereotype, stigma

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 7, 2021

Title: Metabolic & Crystal Arthropathies – Basic & Clinical Science Poster I (0660–0682)

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Pegloticase is FDA-approved for uncontrolled gout and effectively lowers uric acid levels by conversion of circulating uric acid to allantoin, which is readily removed renally.1 One potential factor contributing to the hesitancy among rheumatologists in recommending pegloticase is the longstanding stigma associated with gout patients and perceptions of their ability or willingness to adhere to pharmacological treatments.3 Although rheumatologists may not explicitly endorse negative gout related stereotypes, it is possible that such stigma may unconsciously influence their perceptions of patients’ illness and treatment efficacy, attributions for contributing factors, and treatment decisions. Therefore, we investigated, among practicing rheumatologists, the existence of stigmas associated with gout (compared to rheumatoid arthritis), perceptions of patient behavior, and treatment decisions in these conditions.

Methods: A sample of 27 practicing rheumatologists participated in an online survey that evaluated their causal beliefs, illness perceptions, and treatment recommendations for patients with gout, uncontrolled gout (UG), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Questions also focused on rheumatologists’ perceptions of patient adherence in gout, UG, and RA, as well as the responsibility of patients’ for their condition. All participants completed questions with reference to gout, UG, and RA, which were blocked and presented in random order. This design allows for an assessment of how rheumatologists’ beliefs, perceptions, and recommendations vary across disease condition and its potential impact on treatment recommendations

Results: Mean-level (95% CI) responses across disease condition are represented in the Figure. Responses to questions about gout and UG did not differ significantly (p > 0.10). However, patients with gout/UG vs RA were perceived as significantly more responsible for their own disease condition and less likely to adhere to prescribed treatments (p < 0.05). Additionally, patient personal behavior, diet, BMI, and lack of treatment adherence were perceived as greater contributing factors to gout/UCG vs RA; p < 0.01. Similarly, change in diet, increased exercise, and weight loss was perceived as more beneficial to the management of gout/UG vs. RA; p < 0.01, whereas biological pharmacological treatment was perceived as more effective at managing RA vs. gout or UG; p < 0.01.

Conclusion: Despite advanced training and high knowledge of gout, rheumatologists’ causal beliefs and illness perceptions for patients with gout/UG compared to RA reflect negative gout related stereotypes, with implications for treatment recommendations. Patients with gout/UG vs. RA were perceived as more responsible for their own condition and less likely to adhere to or benefit from biological pharmacological treatment.


Disclosures: N. Edwards, None; B. LaMoreaux, Horizon Therapeutics, 3, 11; J. Vitriol, Horizon Therapeutics, 2; A. Magerman, Horizon Therpeutics, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Edwards N, LaMoreaux B, Vitriol J, Magerman A. Gout Stigma: Investigating the Existence of Gout Stigma and Its Impact on Patient Perceptions and Treatment Decisions [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/gout-stigma-investigating-the-existence-of-gout-stigma-and-its-impact-on-patient-perceptions-and-treatment-decisions/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/gout-stigma-investigating-the-existence-of-gout-stigma-and-its-impact-on-patient-perceptions-and-treatment-decisions/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology