ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2006

Gout Flares After Stopping Anti-inflammatory Prophylaxis During the Early Phases of Urate-Lowering Therapy

Lisa Stamp1, Chris Frampton1, James O'Dell2, Ted Mikuls2, Jeff Newcomb2 and Nicola Dalbeth3, 1University of Otago, Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand, 2University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 3University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: gout

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 18, 2024

Title: Metabolic & Crystal Arthropathies – Basic & Clinical Science Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Anti-inflammatory prophylaxis is recommended during the initial period of urate-lowering therapy (ULT) as gout flares are common during this time. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of gout flares following discontinuation of prophylaxis during the early phase of ULT.

Methods: A literature review and meta-analysis were undertaken. Eligibility criteria included: any clinical trial of people with gout starting ULT with co-administration of anti-inflammatory prophylaxis, and the percentage of participants with ≥ one flare was reported both during and after prophylaxis. Data including number of participants, sex, age, type/dose of ULT, and type/duration of prophylaxis were collected. The percentage of participants having ≥ one flare was collected just prior to stopping prophylaxis; within three months of stopping prophylaxis; and the last period of the trial. Where data were not reported, an invitation was sent to the study investigators requesting aggregated unpublished data. Random effects meta-analyses were used to generate pooled estimates of the percentage of participants experiencing ≥ one flare and changes in these percentages for the studies reporting the relevant paired time periods. Sensitivity analyses based on anti-inflammatory prophylaxis duration, trial duration, ULT class, and excluding placebo arms were undertaken.

Results: A total of 422 trials were identified. Six were included in the final analysis, together with aggregated, unpublished data from the Veterans Affairs STOP Gout trial giving a total of seven studies including 2972 participants. Trial duration ranged from 24 to 104 weeks and prophylaxis from 8 to 48 weeks( Table 1).

During the period on prophylaxis, the pooled random effects estimate of the percentage of participants having ≥ one flare was 14.7% (95%CI 11.3-18.5; I2=83.6%). During the three-month period after ceasing prophylaxis, the pooled random effects estimate of the percentage of participants having ≥ one flare was 29.7% (95%CI 22.9-37.0; I2=92.4%). During last period of the study, the pooled random effects estimate of the percentage of participants having ≥ one flare was 12.2% (95%CI 6.8-19.0; I2=93.6%) (Figure). There was a statistically significant mean difference in the percentage of participants having ≥ one flare while on prophylaxis and soon after ceasing prophylaxis (mean difference -16.0% (95%CI -18.2 to -13.8); p< 0.0001; I2 86.6%) (Figure 1). There was also a statistically significant mean difference in the percentage of participants having ≥ one flare soon after ceasing prophylaxis compared to the last period of the study (mean difference 16.0% (95%CI 9.2 to 22.9); p< 0.001; I2 88.1%). Despite considerable heterogeneity in the results, sensitivity analyses indicated no material effects of prophylaxis duration, trial duration, ULT class, or placebo on the results.

Conclusion: Gout flares are common after stopping prophylaxis, irrespective of duration, but return to levels seen during prophylaxis. People with gout should be cautioned about risk of flares and have a flare management plan particularly in the three months following discontinuation of anti-inflammatory prophylaxis.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2


Disclosures: L. Stamp: Uptodate, 9; C. Frampton: None; J. O'Dell: None; T. Mikuls: Elsevier, 9, Horizon Therapeutics, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, Sanofi, 2, UCB Pharma, 2, Wolters Kluwer Health (UpToDate), 9; J. Newcomb: None; N. Dalbeth: Arthrosi, 2, AstraZeneca, 5, 6, Avalo Therapeutics, 2, Dexcel Pharma, 2, Hikma, 6, Horizon, 2, 6, JPI, 2, JW Pharmaceutical Corporation, 2, LG Chem, 2, Novartis, 6, PK Med, 2, Protalix, 2, PTC Therapeutics, 2, Selecta, 2, Shanton Pharma, 2, Sobi, 2, Unlocked Labs, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Stamp L, Frampton C, O'Dell J, Mikuls T, Newcomb J, Dalbeth N. Gout Flares After Stopping Anti-inflammatory Prophylaxis During the Early Phases of Urate-Lowering Therapy [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/gout-flares-after-stopping-anti-inflammatory-prophylaxis-during-the-early-phases-of-urate-lowering-therapy/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/gout-flares-after-stopping-anti-inflammatory-prophylaxis-during-the-early-phases-of-urate-lowering-therapy/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology