ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1714

Global Consensus Building and Prioritization of Major Challenges in Lupus Diagnosis, Care, Treatment and Research

Karin Tse1, R. Paola Daly1, Leslie Hanrahan2, Annick Anderson3, Kathleen Arntsen4, Sang-Cheol Bae5, Ian N. Bruce6, Karen Costenbader7, Thomas Dörner8, Amy H. Kao9, Susan Manzi10, Eric Morand11, Sandra Raymond1, Brad H. Rovin12, Laura E. Schanberg13, Victoria P. Werth14, Joan Von Feldt15 and Kenneth Getz3, 1Lupus Foundation of America, Washington, DC, 2Lupus Foundation of America, Washington DC, DC, 3Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, Boston, MA, 4Lupus and Allied Diseases, Inc., Verona, NY, 5Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South), 6Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, 7Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 8Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin and Deutsches Rheuma-Forschungszentrum (DRFZ), Berlin, Germany, 9EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc. (a business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), Billerica, MA, 10Autoimmunity Institute and Medicine Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, 11Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, 12Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, 13Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 14Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 15GlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia, PA

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Lupus, qualitative, research methods and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 22, 2018

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Poster – ARHP

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

The Addressing Lupus Pillars for Health Advancement (ALPHA) Project is a global consensus initiative seeking to identify and prioritize top barriers in lupus impacting diagnosis, care, treatment and research, with the goal of improving rates of accurate and timely diagnosis, increasing access to care, and improving short and long-term patient outcomes. This abstract presents Phase I consensus building and prioritization process methodology, and findings of initial project activities.

Methods:

The Lupus Foundation of America and its research partner, Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, assembled a Global Advisory Committee (GAC) of 13 lupus experts across 5 countries to provide input and support throughout the effort. A mixed methods approach is being used to elicit concepts seen as major barriers in lupus diagnosis, care, treatment and research, then consolidate and confirm those selected as most urgent. First, a brief web survey was distributed to each GAC member to begin concept elicitation. Identified items were then ranked during a GAC meeting, and will be presented through an in-depth semi-structured interview among 22 stakeholders representing industry, academia, regulatory bodies, patient/advocacy groups, clinicians, and researchers. Finally, an online survey among 200-500 individuals will further validate and demonstrate consensus around top barriers in a broader audience for this Phase I initiative.

Results:

GAC member response rate was 85% for the concept elicitation exercise. Findings are shown in Figure 1. 15 main concepts were identified, with substantial discussion on lupus heterogeneity, lupus as a spectrum of diseases, and the importance of biomarkers in trial design and understanding of the disease. Categorization and prioritization of these concepts is seen in Figure 2. Notably, all GAC members cited issues surrounding disease definition and diagnosis as the most significant burden in lupus. Half also cited clinical trial design and availability and side effects of current medications as significant burdens.

Conclusion:

The ALPHA Project is a collective, iterative research effort among lupus key opinion leaders and diverse stakeholder groups to build consensus and create actionable steps to advance the field. Findings from the GAC meeting showed initial consensus on key priority issues, such as lupus heterogeneity, disease definition, and clinical trial design.

Figure 1. Concept Elicitation of Top Barriers in Lupus Diagnosis, Care, Treatment and Research

\s

Figure 2. Concept Prioritization from GAC Survey of Top Barriers to Lupus Diagnosis, Care, Treatment and Research


Disclosure: K. Tse, None; R. P. Daly, Lupus Foundation of America, 3; L. Hanrahan, None; A. Anderson, None; K. Arntsen, None; S. C. Bae, None; I. N. Bruce, None; K. Costenbader, None; T. Dörner, None; A. H. Kao, EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc. (a business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), 3; S. Manzi, None; E. Morand, None; S. Raymond, None; B. H. Rovin, None; L. E. Schanberg, None; V. P. Werth, None; J. Von Feldt, None; K. Getz, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Tse K, Daly RP, Hanrahan L, Anderson A, Arntsen K, Bae SC, Bruce IN, Costenbader K, Dörner T, Kao AH, Manzi S, Morand E, Raymond S, Rovin BH, Schanberg LE, Werth VP, Von Feldt J, Getz K. Global Consensus Building and Prioritization of Major Challenges in Lupus Diagnosis, Care, Treatment and Research [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/global-consensus-building-and-prioritization-of-major-challenges-in-lupus-diagnosis-care-treatment-and-research/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/global-consensus-building-and-prioritization-of-major-challenges-in-lupus-diagnosis-care-treatment-and-research/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology