ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 3128

Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Analysis in Blood and Dermal Fibroblasts from Twin Pairs Discordant for Systemic Sclerosis

Paula S. Ramos1, Thomas A. Medsger Jr.2 and Carol A. Feghali-Bostwick1, 1Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 2Medicine/Rheumatology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: DNA Methylation, Gene Expression, genome and systemic sclerosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Systemic Sclerosis, Fibrosing Syndromes and Raynaud's - Pathogenesis, Animal Models and Genetics II

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose: The etiology and mechanisms underlying the wide variation in disease heterogeneity and severity in systemic sclerosis (SSc) remain unknown. To assess the role of DNA methylation in SSc risk and clinical heterogeneity while controlling for genetic background, we performed a genome-wide DNA methylation analysis in whole blood and skin fibroblasts of twin pairs discordant for SSc. We also performed gene expression analysis from the same fibroblasts to investigate the relationship between the DNA methylation changes and mRNA expression levels.

Methods: Genome-wide methylation was assessed on approximately 480,000 CpG sites using genomic DNA isolated from 1) whole blood from 20 twin pairs discordant for limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc) and 10 twin pairs discordant for diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc), and 2) skin fibroblasts cultured from dermal punch biopsies of 7 twin pairs discordant for dcSSc and 5 twin pairs discordant for lcSSc. Total RNA was extracted from fibroblasts in passage 3 for gene expression profiling of 47,000 transcripts. An efficiency analysis was performed with caGEDA to determine best normalization and feature selection methods and to identify differentially methylated probes and differential gene expression between unaffected and affected twins. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis was used for pathway analysis.

Results: A total of 68 CpGs were differentially methylated in whole blood from patients with SSc compared with their healthy twin. In the disease subsets, 206 and 409 CpGs were differentially methylated in the twin pairs discordant for lcSSc and dcSSc, respectively. Only 1% of differentially methylated genes were common between both subsets. In the dermal fibroblasts, 103 CpGs were differentially methylated in patients with SSc compared with their healthy twin. In the disease subsets, 110 and 220 CpGs were differentially methylated in lcSSc and dcSSc, respectively. 7% of differentially methylated genes were common between both subsets. In each disease subset, less than 2% of differentially methylated genes were observed in blood and fibroblasts. Despite the enrichment of different pathways and biological functions in each cell type and disease subset, most of these pathways can be placed into broader categories implicating an overall involvement of cancer functions. On the other hand, gene expression data from fibroblasts revealed 20% of genes shared between disease subsets. There were common and unique pathways enriched in disease subsets, also implicating an involvement of cancer functions. There were no genes simultaneously differentially methylated and expressed in either disease subset.

Conclusion: The distinct methylation patterns observed in blood and fibroblasts between lcSSc and dcSSc corroborate a similar observation reported in skin fibroblasts and suggest that subset-specific epigenetic signatures may be, at least in part, responsible for the clinical heterogeneity of the disease. These data also support a role for DNA methylation differences in mediating susceptibility to SSc.


Disclosure: P. S. Ramos, None; T. A. Medsger Jr., None; C. A. Feghali-Bostwick, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ramos PS, Medsger TA Jr., Feghali-Bostwick CA. Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Analysis in Blood and Dermal Fibroblasts from Twin Pairs Discordant for Systemic Sclerosis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/genome-wide-dna-methylation-analysis-in-blood-and-dermal-fibroblasts-from-twin-pairs-discordant-for-systemic-sclerosis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/genome-wide-dna-methylation-analysis-in-blood-and-dermal-fibroblasts-from-twin-pairs-discordant-for-systemic-sclerosis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology