ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1523

Genetic architecture and translational insights for SLE progression from preclinical stages

Lida Wang1, havell Markus1, Laura Carrel1, Nancy Olsen2, Galen Foulke3 and Dajiang Liu1, 1Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, 2Penn State University/Milton S Hershey, Hershey, PA, 3Penn State Health, Hershey, PA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Biostatistics, genetics, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 27, 2025

Title: (1517–1552) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Treatment Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), have a preclinical phase where individuals display a subset of symptoms, but do not meet the full diagnostic criteria. Identifying genetic variants influencing the progression from preclinical stage is crucial, since autoimmunity can quickly cause irreversible organ damage. Biobanks with electronic health records are valuable for studying disease progression but can be underpowered due to limited number of diseases cases. We previously developed genetic prediction scores (GPS, Wang, Markus et al, Nature Communications, 2025) that can predict the progression of SLE from preclinical stages. Compared to conventional genetic risk scores calculated from SLE case-control studies, the GPS method increases the accuracy of risk prediction by ~20%-1000%. Despite the progress, individual variants associated with SLE progressions remain elusive. More powerful methods are needed to understand the etiology of preclinical SLE.

Methods: Almost SLE cases will undergo a preclinical stage with positive antinuclear antibody. Leveraging this insight, we can break the genetic effects influencing healthy → SLE transition into the effects influencing healthy → preclinical and that influencing preclinical → SLE transition, leading a novel Bayesian model to detect genetic association with progression (GAP). GAP borrows strength from the large sample sizes of SLE case-control studies and improves power of GWAS for progression phenotypes (Fig 1). We also developed a novel drug repurposing pipeline that leverages GAP results to identify compounds capable of slowing down the preclinical → SLE progression by reversing the expression levels of causal genes in disease-relevant cell types including B cells.

Results: We apply GAP to identify genetic associations with preclinical → SLE progressions, integrating BioVU biobank (749 SLE cases, 2,784 preclinical individuals, 46,174 controls) and case-control GWAS summary statistics from six different studies (14,355 cases and 505,956 controls). We identified 4 and 17 novel loci for control → preclinical and preclinical → SLE progressions (Fig 2). Intriguingly, two causal variants in IRF5 are colocalized with eQTLs from different genes, emphasizing the importance of resolving phenotype heterogeneities due to different disease stages. Leveraging our drug-repurposing pipeline, we identify several novel drugs, leukotriene receptor antagonist (montelukast) and TNF-α inhibitors (pentoxifylline and lenalidomide). We also confirmed the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine for slowing down SLE progression, a drug that is frequently prescribed but lacking solid scientific support.

Conclusion: Our results reveal distinct genetic architecture of healthy → preclinical and preclinical → SLE progressions. The novel genes and putative drugs we identify will inform clinical studies and accelerate the therapeutic development for slowing the progression of SLE from preclinical stages.

Supporting image 1Fig 1. Study design and the key model for the method to detect genetic associations with progression phenotype. Panel A: each SLE patients will undergo a preclinical stage. Panel B. We will decompose the genetic effects into effects influencing healthy to preclinical progressions and the effects influencing preclinical to SLE progressions.

Supporting image 2Fig 2. GWAS identifies distinct loci influencing different stages of SLE progression. Left panel: GWAS hits influencing healthy to preclinical stage progressions. Right panel: GWAS hits influencing preclinical to SLE progressions. Green color shows loci identified previously from case-control studies and yellow color shows loci unique to SLE progression traits.


Disclosures: L. Wang: None; h. Markus: None; L. Carrel: None; N. Olsen: Atare Bio, 5, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 1, UCB, 5, Zenas, 5; G. Foulke: None; D. Liu: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Wang L, Markus h, Carrel L, Olsen N, Foulke G, Liu D. Genetic architecture and translational insights for SLE progression from preclinical stages [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/genetic-architecture-and-translational-insights-for-sle-progression-from-preclinical-stages/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/genetic-architecture-and-translational-insights-for-sle-progression-from-preclinical-stages/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology