ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2810

Fracture and Bone Mineral Density Response By Baseline Risk in Patients Treated with Abaloparatide Followed By Alendronate

Benjamin Leder1, Carol Zapalowski2, Ming-Yi Hu3 and Gary Hattersley2, 1Endocrine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 2Radius Health, Inc., Waltham, MA, 3Biometrics, Radius Health, Inc., Waltham, MA

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Bone, Bone density, bone disease and osteoporosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: 5T087 ACR Abstract: Osteoporosis & Metabolic Bone Disease–Basic & Clinical Science (2808–2813)

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose:

Abaloparatide (ABL) is an anabolic PTHrP analog approved to treat postmenopausal women with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture. In the ACTIVE Phase 3 study of postmenopausal osteoporotic women, 18 months of ABL significantly increased bone mineral density (BMD) and reduced the risk of vertebral, nonvertebral, clinical, and major osteoporotic fractures versus placebo (PBO) irrespective of baseline risk factors. In ACTIVExtend, women assigned to receive ABL or PBO in ACTIVE were offered enrollment in an extension study during which both groups received open-label alendronate (ALN) 70 mg weekly for 24 months. In this analysis, we assess whether fracture risk reduction and BMD gains were consistent across multiple subgroups categorized by baseline risk.

Methods:

A total of 1,139 patients (558, ABL/ALN and 581, PBO/ALN) were enrolled in ACTIVExtend (18 months of ABL or PBO followed by 1 month for re-consent, followed by 24 months of ALN treatment for a total of 43 months). Risk factor subgroups were prospectively defined by BMD T-score of the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck (≤ -2.5 vs > -2.5; ≤ -3.0 vs > -3.0); nonvertebral fracture history (yes/no); prevalent vertebral fracture at baseline of ACTIVE (yes/no); and age (< 65 vs 65 to < 75 vs ≥ 75 years) at baseline. Treatment effects in subgroups were assessed by forest plots and statistical tests for interactions using relative risk ratios for new vertebral fractures (Breslow-Day test), hazard ratios for nonvertebral fractures (Cox proportional hazards model), and least-squares mean differences in percent change for BMD (ANCOVA).

Results:

Patients in ACTIVExtend were well balanced for baseline characteristics including age, lumbar spine BMD, total hip BMD, femoral neck BMD, vertebral fracture, and prior nonvertebral fracture. The relative risk reductions for new vertebral, non-vertebral, clinical, and major osteoporotic fractures were greater in the ABL/ALN group compared with the PBO/ALN group for all subgroups analyzed. There was no evidence of meaningful interaction between treatment assignment and any baseline risk variable. Additionally, BMD gains at 43 months for total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine were greater in the ABL/ALN group versus the PBO/ALN group among all subgroups analyzed without any meaningful interaction between treatment assignment and any baseline risk variable.

Conclusion:

These results suggest that the improved efficacy of 18 months of ABL followed by 24 months of ALN versus 18 months of PBO followed by 24 months of ALN is unaffected by baseline risk. Fracture risk reductions and BMD increases were consistent among all prespecified patient risk subgroups.


Disclosure: B. Leder, Amgen Inc., 5,Eli Lilly and Co., 5,Radius Health, Inc., 5,Amgen Inc., 2,Eli Lilly and Co., 2; C. Zapalowski, Radius Health, Inc., 3; M. Y. Hu, Radius Health, Inc., 3; G. Hattersley, Radius Health, Inc., 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Leder B, Zapalowski C, Hu MY, Hattersley G. Fracture and Bone Mineral Density Response By Baseline Risk in Patients Treated with Abaloparatide Followed By Alendronate [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/fracture-and-bone-mineral-density-response-by-baseline-risk-in-patients-treated-with-abaloparatide-followed-by-alendronate/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/fracture-and-bone-mineral-density-response-by-baseline-risk-in-patients-treated-with-abaloparatide-followed-by-alendronate/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology