ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0891

Four-Year Efficacy and Safety of Guselkumab in Psoriasis Patients with and Without Psoriatic Arthritis: A Pooled Analysis from VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2

Kristian Reich1, Jan Dutz2, Peter Foley3, Diamant Thaçi4, Ron Vender5, Michael Song6, Megan Miller6, Yin Yu6, Shu Li7, Yaung-Kaung Shen6 and April W. Armstrong8, 1Translational Research in Inflammatory Skin Diseases, Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, and Skinflammation®, Hamburg, Germany, 2Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada, 3University of Melbourne, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne and Skin & Cancer Foundation Inc, Carlton, Australia, 4Institute and Comprehensive Center for Inflammation Medicine, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany, 5McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada, 6Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, 7Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, 8Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 7, 2020

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Guselkumab (GUS), a fully human monoclonal antibody, selectively binds and blocks IL-23. VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 are two ongoing Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)/active comparator-controlled clinical trials of GUS in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis (PsO). This post-hoc analysis reported pooled results through 4 years among a subgroup of moderate-to-severe PsO patients with self-reported PsA at baseline.

Methods: 1829 patients were randomized to GUS 100 mg at Weeks 0, 4, and 12, then every 8 weeks (q8wk); PBO at Weeks 0, 4, and 12, GUS at Weeks 16 and 20 then q8wk; or adalimumab (ADA) 80 mg at Week 0, 40 mg at Week 1, then 40 mg q2wk until Week 47 (VOYAGE 1) or Week 23 (VOYAGE 2). In VOYAGE 1, all patients received open-label GUS 100 mg q8wk during Weeks 52-204. VOYAGE 2 incorporated a randomized withdrawal study design, followed by open-label GUS during Weeks 76-204. Pooled subgroup analyses using the combined GUS group were conducted based on self-reported PsA status at baseline. Efficacy based on Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) response was assessed using prespecified treatment failure rules (nonresponder status for all time points after discontinuing due to lack of efficacy, worsening of PsO, or use of a prohibited treatment).

Results: For pooled VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 patients (N=1721), combined GUS and ADA→GUS response rates at Weeks 100, 156, and 204 were: PASI 90 80.6%, 80.0%, and 80.4%; PASI 100 50.1%, 49.9%, and 52.2%; IGA 0/1 83.6%, 83.3%, and 81.7%; and IGA 0 54.3%, 52.9%, and 53.9, respectively. In the pooled subgroup analysis of patients with and without PsA, response rates were similar across the Week 100, Week 156, and Week 204 evaluations (Table). Rates of adverse events through Week 204 were comparable for patients with PsA vs those without PsA at baseline.

Conclusion: Among GUS-treated patients with moderate-to-severe PsO with and without self-reported PsA at baseline, stable, durable, and high levels of skin responses, as well as comparable safety outcomes, through 4 years were observed.

Table: Pooled Guselkumab Response Rates


Disclosure: K. Reich, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Affibody, 2, 5, 8, Almirall, 2, 5, 8, Amgen, 2, 5, 8, Biogen, 2, 5, 8, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, 5, 8, Celgene, 2, 5, 8, Centocor, 2, 5, 8, Covagen, 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Forward Pharma, 2, 5, 8, Fresenius Medical Care, 2, 5, 8, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, 5, 8, Janssen-Cilag, 2, 5, 8, Kyowa Kirin, 2, 5, 8, LEO Pharma, 2, 5, 8, Medac, 2, 5, 8, Merck Sharp & Dohme, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Miltenyi Biotec, 2, 5, 8, Ocean Pharma, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, Regeneron, 2, 5, 8, Samsung Bioepis, 2, 5, 8, Sanofi, 2, 5, 8, Takeda, 2, 5, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 8, Valeant, 2, 5, 8, Xenoport, 2, 5, 8; J. Dutz, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2; P. Foley, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2; D. Thaçi, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2, AbbVie, 5, 8, Almirall, 5, 8, Bioskin, 5, 8, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, 8, Celgene, 2, 5, 8, Dignity, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 5, 8, Galapagos, 5, 8, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, 8, LEO Pharma, 5, 8, Medac, 5, 8, Merck Sharp & Dohme, 5, 8, Morphosys, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Regeneron, 5, 8, Samsung Sandoz-Hexal, 5, 8, Sanofi, 5, 8, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8; R. Vender, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2; M. Song, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; M. Miller, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; Y. Yu, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; S. Li, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; Y. Shen, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; A. Armstrong, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Reich K, Dutz J, Foley P, Thaçi D, Vender R, Song M, Miller M, Yu Y, Li S, Shen Y, Armstrong A. Four-Year Efficacy and Safety of Guselkumab in Psoriasis Patients with and Without Psoriatic Arthritis: A Pooled Analysis from VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/four-year-efficacy-and-safety-of-guselkumab-in-psoriasis-patients-with-and-without-psoriatic-arthritis-a-pooled-analysis-from-voyage-1-and-voyage-2/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/four-year-efficacy-and-safety-of-guselkumab-in-psoriasis-patients-with-and-without-psoriatic-arthritis-a-pooled-analysis-from-voyage-1-and-voyage-2/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology