ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meeting Abstracts
    • All Meetings
    • PRSYM 2026
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • Download Abstract Supplements
  • Keyword Index
  • Search
  • My Favorites
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all favorites

Abstract Number: 1240

Foot Osteomyelitis in Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases: A Retrospective Observational Study

Alexis HOMS1, Patrick ABOUKRAT2, Christian JORGENSEN3,4 and Yves-Marie PERS5,6, 1Department of rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Osteoarticular Diseases Therapeutic Unit, Lapeyronie University Hospital, Montpellier, France, 2Department of physical medical rehabilitation, Lapeyronie University Hospital, Montpellier, France., Montpellier, France, 3Clinical Immunology and Osteoarticular Diseases Therapeutic Unit, CHU Lapeyronie., Montpellier, France, 4biotherapy, Inserm u1183, Unite ImmunoRhumatologie Therapeutique, Montpellier, France, 5Clinical Immunology and Osteoarticular Diseases Therapeutic Unit, Lapeyronie University Hospital Montpellier, MONTPELLIER, France, 6INSERM U1183, IRMB, INSERM U1183, Montpellier, France

Meeting: ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2018

Keywords: foot, osteomyelitis, rheumatic disease and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 22, 2018

Title: Infection-related Rheumatic Disease Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Foot involvement is frequently pointed by patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD), such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthritis (SpA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA). According to previous studies, IRD patients are at higher risk of developing osteomyelitis (rate ratio 10.63), although incidence rate seems to be low (0,17/100 patients-years)1. Given the increased infectious risk, especially induced by steroids or immunosuppressive drugs, our aim was to report the occurrence of foot osteomyelitis in the patients suffering from IRD and recruited in our center over the last twenty years.

Methods: We performed a monocentric retrospective observational study that collected MISP (Medicalized Information System Program) data in the Montpellier University Hospital, from August 1996 to May 2016. We included all patients with IRD who presentedaclinical suspicion of osteomyelitis (classic inflammation signs, or fever), with confirmation by definite imaging (Magnetic Resonance Imaging, tomography, or radiographic) findings and at least one positive microbiological culture. We excluded patients with isolated soft tissue infection, no microbiological sampling, or no imaging finding, as well as patients with incomplete data about their IRD history (long-term treatments, immunology, erosive status). Two groups were dissociated: the first with foot osteomyelitis patients (FO), the other with osteomyelitis patients not affecting the foot (NFO). In the patient medical file, we collected demographic, clinical, biological and imaging data. The comparison between each group was performed using the Student test for quantitative variables and using a Chi-2 test for qualitative variables.

Results: Among the 235 MISP search findings, we identified 69 bone infections that met the inclusion criteria, of which 41 (59.4%) involving the foot. In the FO group, RA was highly predominant (92.6%), with an advanced (24.6 +/- 13.1 years of evolution) and severe illness (37 cases, 92.5% patients with erosions). Patients were mainly treated by corticosteroids (65.9%), methotrexate (32.1 %) and biologics (28.6%). Diabetes was the most frequent comorbidity (8 cases, 19.5%). Osteomyelitis mainly involved forefoot (75.6%), especially in the first ray (41.1% of infections). Staphylococcus aureus was the most involved organism (53.7%). We significantly found fewer systemic complications (sepsis or endocarditis) in the FO group compared to the NFO group (2.4% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.002). Furthermore, corticosteroids use was associated to a significant risk in the FO group compared to the NFO group (65.9% vs. 39.3%, p = 0,03). No increasing infectious risk was found for biological drugs users in the FO group (31.7% vs 28.6%., p = 0.78).

Conclusion: Description of FO is scarce in IRD. Our study reported a significant occurrence, especially in patients with severe RA using steroids. A special attention should be done to identify risk factors and possibly correct them.

References

1. Doran et al. Frequency of infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with controls: a population-based study. Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Sep;46(9):2287–93


Disclosure: A. HOMS, None; P. ABOUKRAT, None; C. JORGENSEN, None; Y. M. PERS, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

HOMS A, ABOUKRAT P, JORGENSEN C, PERS YM. Foot Osteomyelitis in Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases: A Retrospective Observational Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/foot-osteomyelitis-in-inflammatory-rheumatic-diseases-a-retrospective-observational-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2018

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/foot-osteomyelitis-in-inflammatory-rheumatic-diseases-a-retrospective-observational-study/

Advanced Search

My Favorites

Save and print abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract (must have cookies enabled in browser). See saved favorites.

Abstract Policies

  • ACR Convergence Abstract Embargo Policies
  • ACR Convergence Abstract Permissions & Reprints
  • PRSYM Abstract Policies

ACR Convergence. Where Rheumatology Meets

ACR Convergence 2026

Join us November 6-11 in Orlando, Florida.
See Registration Information

  • Contact ACR
  • Privacy Policy
  • ACR Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2026 American College of Rheumatology