ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 158

Focus Groups Reveal Knowledge Gaps in Patients with Gout-A Qualitative Study

Puja Khanna1, Veronica Berrocal2, Tonya Hays3, Daniel J. Clauw4 and David A. Williams5, 1Division of Rheumatology/Dept. of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 2Department of Biostatistics- School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 3Survey Research Center, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 4Anesthesiology/Internal Medicine (Rheum), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 5Chronic Pain & Fatigue Rsch Ctr, Univ of MI Hlth System-Lobby M, Ann Arbor, MI

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: gout

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Gout is the most treatable arthritis in the Western World and there are effective medications available to treat both acute episodes and chronic gout. Prior studies have shown that treatment of chronic gout leads to improvement in patient-reported outcomes, and inadequate control has a substantial economic impact on the patient, employer, and society. Despite this, gout has the lowest adherence to medications (38%) across common chronic conditions such as hypertension, osteoporosis and diabetes mellitus. Currently, demographics, comorbidities, and poor adherence to chronic therapy are considered important attributes in developing poorly controlled gout. There is limited qualitative research assessing barriers to treatment and management among patients and health care providers. Therefore, we performed focus groups in patients with gout to identify conceptual gaps from patients’ perspective.

Methods: A trained moderator conducted formal in-depth focus groups in gout patients, who were enrolled using an online screening survey where they provided details of their gout management including medications. The script for the focus group included questions to test their knowledge about the natural history of gout, understanding about different aspects of treatment of gout (acute treatment vs. prophylaxis vs. chronic urate-lowering therapy), beliefs about how long the treatment should be taken, discussion on adherence to their medications, perceptions about the association between diet and alcohol and gout flares, and coping with an acute attack of gout. Adherence to medications was measured using a validated eight-question adherence instrument, Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, which is scored as low, medium, and high adherence.

Results: Twenty-four patients participated in 4 focus groups that lasted 90 minutes each. Baseline demographics showed predominantly white males (75%), 18% Hispanic, mean age 47.8 (15.4) years, 33% had tophaceous gout as diagnosed by their physician, and 62% were on ULT.  Majority were receiving care from their primary care physicians (PCP, n=13), 4 from a rheumatologist, and remaining from PCP/ other subspecialties (n=5), or self-treated (n=2). The following themes emerged upon transcription of the scripts from these sessions: 1) Patients did not have a clear understanding of the natural history of gout; 2) patients did not realize that recurrent acute flares resulted in chronic joint damage; 3) there was lack of knowledge regarding treatment options and duration of therapy for acute and chronic gout; 4) patients felt that physicians did not spend enough time explaining the progression, i.e. natural history of the disease and its long-term effects; 5)  patients did not grasp the need for chronic ULT to avoid complications and disability; and 6) patients were not aware of treatment goals for hyperuricemia, as evident by adherence to their gout medications. In these groups, 38% had low and 42% had medium adherence to their gout medications, respectively (per MMAS).

Conclusion: This qualitative study provides important insight into key modifiable variables that can be targeted to develop educational materials for patients.


Disclosure:

P. Khanna,

Takeda,

8,

Veteran Affairs,

,

ARDEA,

,

Savient,

,

ACR-REF Bridge funding Award,

2;

V. Berrocal,
None;

T. Hays,
None;

D. J. Clauw,
None;

D. A. Williams,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/focus-groups-reveal-knowledge-gaps-in-patients-with-gout-a-qualitative-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology