ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meeting Abstracts
    • All Meetings
    • PRSYM 2026
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • Download Abstract Supplements
  • Keyword Index
  • My Favorites
    • View & print my favorites
  • Search

Home » Meeting Abstracts » ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2018

Abstract Number: 1816

Five-Year Outcome of Operative and Nonoperative Management of Meniscal Tear in the Presence of Osteoarthritic Changes

Jeffrey N. Katz1, Swastina Shrestha2, Elena Losina3, Lisa A. Mandl4, Bruce Levy5, Kurt Spindler6 and Jamie E. Collins7, 1Brigham & Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 2Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 3Orthopaedics, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 4Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 5Orthopedics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 6Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 7Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

Share on X (Twitter) Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Email
Print

Meeting: ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2018

Keywords: meniscectomy, meniscus, osteoarthritis and physical therapy, Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)

Session Information

Date: Monday, October 22, 2018

Title: 4M042 ACR Abstract: Plenary Session II (1816–1821)

Session Type: ACR Plenary Session

Session Time: 11:00AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: While recent trials have examined short-term (~ 2 year) outcomes of surgical and nonoperative treatment of meniscal tear in the setting of osteoarthritis there has been little study of longer term outcomes of these treatments.  

Methods: We examined 5-year outcomes of subjects in MeTeOR (Clintrials.gov NCT00597012), a multicenter randomized trial of physical therapy (PT) vs. PT plus arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) for subjects with knee pain, meniscal tear and OA changes on xray or MRI. The primary outcome for this analysis was the Knee Osteoarthritis and Injury Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Scale (0-100, 100 worst). Total knee replacement (TKR) was a secondary outcome.  To address changes in KOOS Pain over 5 years, we used a piecewise linear mixed model, stratified by treatment group (randomized to and received APM; randomized to and received PT; randomized to PT but received APM during follow-up). The model censored subjects who had TKR and adjusted for age, sex, BMI, and mental health status. We used a pattern mixture model to assess whether the findings were biased by missing data due to TKR or losses to follow-up.  We calculated the frequency of TKR over follow-up and used a Cox proportional hazards model to estimate the risk of TKR for treatment groups and KL grades, adjusting for baseline factors.

Results: The 351 subjects had mean age 58; 57% were female. 164 were randomized to and received APM; 109 were randomized to and received PT; 68 were randomized to PT and crossed over to receive APM.  10 subjects were randomized to but did not receive APM and were not analyzed. 66% of subjects completed ≥ 9 of 12 follow-up questionnaires, with similar completion rates across treatment groups. The piecewise linear model (Figure) showed similar pain improvement in the 3 treatment groups, with baseline KOOS Pain scores of 40-50 improving to 20-25 by 6 months and little change between 6 and 60 months. The pattern mixture models demonstrated similar patterns in pain scores as the main analysis, suggesting TKR and other losses to follow up did not bias these findings.

25 participants (7%) had TKR over follow-up.  In the Cox model, the hazard of TKR was higher in those treated surgically (randomized to APM or crossed over) than those randomized to and receiving PT (HR 5.0, 95% CI: 1.2, 21.8), and in those with KL-3 radiographs vs. KL0-2 (HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.2, 6.4).

Conclusion: Pain relief was similar across treatment groups, while the few TKR’s were more common in those with KL3 and those receiving APM. These data suggest that persons with degenerative meniscal tear generally experience substantial pain relief over 5 years, irrespective of initial treatment. The greater risk of TKR in those treated with APM could reflect selection effects and/or faster progression of OA following surgery than following PT, and merits further study. 

Fig: KOOS Pain (shaded 95% CI) stratified by treatment in piecewise linear model


Disclosure: J. N. Katz, None; S. Shrestha, None; E. Losina, Samumed, 5,JBJS, 5; L. A. Mandl, None; B. Levy, Arthrex, 2, 5, 7,Smith and Nephew, 2, 5; K. Spindler, None; J. E. Collins, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Katz JN, Shrestha S, Losina E, Mandl LA, Levy B, Spindler K, Collins JE. Five-Year Outcome of Operative and Nonoperative Management of Meniscal Tear in the Presence of Osteoarthritic Changes [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/five-year-outcome-of-operative-and-nonoperative-management-of-meniscal-tear-in-the-presence-of-osteoarthritic-changes/. Accessed .

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/five-year-outcome-of-operative-and-nonoperative-management-of-meniscal-tear-in-the-presence-of-osteoarthritic-changes/

My Favorites

Save and print abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract (must have cookies enabled in browser). See saved favorites.

Abstract Policies

  • ACR Convergence Abstract Embargo Policies
  • ACR Convergence Abstract Permissions & Reprints
  • PRSYM Abstract Policies

ACR Convergence. Where Rheumatology Meets

ACR Convergence 2026

Join us November 6-11 in Orlando, Florida.
See Registration Information

  • Contact ACR
  • Privacy Policy
  • ACR Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2026 American College of Rheumatology