ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 453

Fish Oil in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Randomised, Double Blind Trial Comparing High Dose with Low Dose

Susanna Proudman1, Llew Spargo1, Cindy Hall1, Leah McWilliams1, Anita Lee1, Maureen Rischmueller2, Robert Gibson3, Michael James1 and Leslie G. Cleland1, 1Rheumatology Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia, 2Rheumatology Department, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia, 3University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: combination therapies, randomized trials and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: The symptomatic benefit and NSAID-sparing effects of fish oil (FO) in RA are well known but effects on disease outcomes are less well established, especially in the context of contemporary treatment of early RA. The aim of this investigator-initiated randomized controlled trial was to assess the effects of high vs. low dose FO on disease outcomes in patients with early RA receiving a “treat-to-target” protocol of combination DMARDs.

Methods: Patients with RA according to ACR criteria with active polyarthritis of <12 months' duration and who were DMARD-na•ve, received MTX, sulphasalazine and hydroxychloroquine. They were randomized 2:1 to fish oil at a high dose (FO) or low dose (control) providing 5.5 and 0.4 g/day respectively, of the marine omega-3 fats, EPA+DHA. DMARD doses were adjusted according to a pre-defined protocol taking disease activity and toxicity into account. DAS28-ESR, mHAQ, remission and plasma phospholipids were assessed 3 monthly. In a novel study design, the primary outcome was DMARD use at 52 weeks, defined as the addition of leflunomide to triple therapy (“failure of triple therapy”).

Results: After 52 weeks, there were no significant differences between treatment groups for the outcomes of MTX dose, DAS28 or mHAQ; but compared with controls (16/46, 35%), fewer FO patients (9/75, 12%) had commenced leflunomide (p= 0.005, Fisher’s exact test). In FO patients, the rate of commencement of leflunomide was lower (Hazard Ratio 0.27, 95%CI 0.12-0.59) whereas the rate of achieving first ACR remission was higher (HR 2.22, 95%CI 1.18-4.18) compared with controls (Kaplan-Meier estimate).

There was considerable overlap in plasma omega-3 levels between the FO and control groups. Results were analysed by plasma omega-3 quartiles (t12AUC/unit time). Compared with the lowest quartile, patients in the highest quartile had significantly higher odds of achieving remission, by either DAS28 or ACR criteria (respectively, OR =3.30, 95% CI; 1.13-9.71, OR = 3.53, 95%CI; 1.05-11.90).

Conclusion: FO was associated with benefits additional to those achieved by combination “treat-to-target” DMARDs with similar MTX use. The benefits included reduced likelihood of progression to leflunomide (“failure of triple therapy”) and a higher rate of ACR remission. High plasma n-3 fatty acids were associated with higher odds of achieving remission.


Disclosure:

S. Proudman,
None;

L. Spargo,
None;

C. Hall,
None;

L. McWilliams,
None;

A. Lee,
None;

M. Rischmueller,
None;

R. Gibson,
None;

M. James,
None;

L. G. Cleland,

Melrose Laboratories,

9.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/fish-oil-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-randomised-double-blind-trial-comparing-high-dose-with-low-dose/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology