ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1064

Feasibility and Validity of Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in SLE

Shanthini Kasturi1, Jayme C. Burket2, Jessica Berman1, Kyriakos A. Kirou1, Alana B. Levine1, Lisa R. Sammaritano1 and Lisa Mandl1,3, 1Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 2Healthcare Research Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 3Department of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: patient-reported outcome measures and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), PROMIS

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Clinical Aspects and Treatment II: Patient-Reported Measures, Outcomes and Reporting

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Accurate measurement of patient reported
outcomes (PROs) is particularly important in SLE, a heterogeneous disease in
which similar symptoms can have disparate impact across patients. PROMIS offers dynamic computer adaptive
tests (CATs) to precisely and efficiently measure PROs in a variety of relevant
domains. The aims of this study were to: 1) assess the feasibility of
administering PROMIS CATS serially to SLE outpatients; 2) correlate PROMIS CATs
with legacy PRO measures, SLE disease activity and organ damage; 3) assess
retest reliability of PROMIS CATs.

Methods: Adults meeting ACR SLE classification criteria were
recruited from a SLE Center of Excellence. Subjects completed the Short Form-36
(SF-36), LupusQoL-US, and selected PROMIS CATs. SLE disease activity, flare,
and damage were evaluated with the SELENA-SLEDAI and SLICC-ACR damage index.
PROMIS domains were compared with disease activity, damage, and similar domains
in legacy instruments using Spearman correlations. Retest reliability was
evaluated among subjects reporting stable SLE activity at two assessments a
week apart using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).

Results: Of 114 patients approached, 101 (89%) completed at
least one assessment (Table 1), 81 (80%) completing it remotely. 91 (90%)
completed a retest. Most PROMIS domains showed moderate to strong correlations
with similar domains in both legacy instruments, although social function and
fatigue CATs showed poor, non-significant correlations with similar SF-36
domains (Table 2). On average, flaring subjects scored a clinically meaningful
half standard deviation worse on PROMIS pain and social function CATs (p
<0.05). However, correlations between PROMIS and SLEDAI were overall weak
(mean r = 0.24, p <0.05). SLICC scores did not consistently correlate with
PROMIS. PROMIS retest ICCs were 0.78 to 0.89.

Conclusion: To our
knowledge, this is the first study to assess the feasibility and validity of
administering PROMIS CATs to adult SLE outpatients. These data show that PROMIS
CATs can be successfully administered to diverse SLE patients at the point of
care or remotely, and are valid, reliable and responsive for many SLE relevant
domains. The weak correlations of social function and fatigue CATs with
corresponding SF-36 domains point to a knowledge gap and the need for further
study. Importantly, PROMIS scores did not correlate well with the
SLEDAI. This
disconnect between objective signs and symptoms and the subjective patient
disease experience underscores the crucial need to integrate PROs into clinical
care to ensure optimal disease management.

Table 1. Baseline Demographics and SLE Characteristics

Enrolled

(n = 101)

Not Enrolled

(n = 13)

P Value

Age:

mean ± SD years, (range)

40.1 ± 13.9,

(19 -73)

45.3 ± 12.7,

(24 – 71)

0.20

Disease Duration:

mean ± SD years, (range)

11.8 ± 8.3,

(0 – 48)

21.5 ± 13.9,

(6 – 39)

0.02*

Female: n (%)

90 (89.1)

12 (92.3)

> 0.99

Race: n (%)

0.53

White

32 (31.7)

6 (46.2)

Black

31 (30.7)

2 (15.4)

Asian

16 (15.8)

2 (15.4)

Other

22 (21.8)

3 (23.1)

Ethnicity:  n (%)

Hispanic/Latino

31 (30.7)

4 (30.8)

0.60

Insurance: n (%)

0.02*

Medicaid

34 (33.7)

7 (53.8)

Medicare

13 (12.9)

4 (30.8)

Private

54 (53.5)

2 (15.4)

Disease Characteristics:

Physician Global Assessment:

mean ± SD, (range)

0.82 ± 0.64

(0 – 2)

SLEDAI:

mean ± SD, (range)

5.3 ± 4.56

(0 – 24)

SELENA-SLEDAI Flare: n (%)

21 (20.2)

SLICC:

mean ± SD, (range)

2.0 ± 2.94

(0 – 16)

*Non-enrolled patients had significantly longer disease duration and were more likely to be insured by Medicaid.

 

Table 2. Instrument Correlations

Domain

PROMIS CAT Domain

Legacy Instrument Domain

Spearman’s r

Physical Function

Physical Function

SF-36/Physical Function

0.84

Physical Function

SF-36/Role Physical

0.67

Physical Function

SF-36/PCS

0.58

Physical Function

Lupus QoL-US/Physical Health

0.84

Mobility

SF-36/Physical Function

0.86

Mobility

SF-36/Role Physical

0.57

Mobility

SF-36/PCS

0.54

Mobility

Lupus QoL-US/Physical Health

0.80

Pain

Pain Behavior

SF-36/Bodily Pain

0.73

Pain Behavior

Lupus QoL-US/Pain

-0.78

Pain Interference

SF-36/Bodily Pain

0.78

Pain Interference

Lupus QoL-US/Pain

-0.82

Fatigue

Fatigue

SF-36/Vitality

0.04 (p = 0.67)

Fatigue

Lupus QoL-US/Fatigue

0.79

Emotional Health

Anger

SF-36/Mental Health

-0.28

Anger

SF-36/Role Emotional

-0.55

Anger

SF-36/MCS

-0.63

Anger

Lupus QoL-US/Emotional

-0.74

Anxiety

SF-36/Mental Health

-0.30

Anxiety

SF-36/Role Emotional

-0.48

Anxiety

SF-36/MCS

-0.58

Anxiety

Lupus QoL-US/Emotional

-0.76

Depression

SF-36/Mental Health

-0.20 (p = 0.05)

Depression

SF-36/Role Emotional

-0.56

Depression

SF-36/MCS

-0.60

Depression

Lupus QoL-US/Emotional

-0.76

Social Function

Ability to Participate in Social Roles

SF-36/Social Function

0.09 (p = 0.35)

Satisfaction with Social Roles

SF-36/Social Function

0.03 (p = 0.67)

All p values < 0.0001 unless otherwise noted.


Disclosure: S. Kasturi, None; J. C. Burket, None; J. Berman, None; K. A. Kirou, None; A. B. Levine, None; L. R. Sammaritano, None; L. Mandl, Up-To Date, 7,Annals of Internal Medicine, 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kasturi S, Burket JC, Berman J, Kirou KA, Levine AB, Sammaritano LR, Mandl L. Feasibility and Validity of Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in SLE [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/feasibility-and-validity-of-patient-reported-outcome-measurement-information-system-promis-in-sle/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/feasibility-and-validity-of-patient-reported-outcome-measurement-information-system-promis-in-sle/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology