ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1

Factors Predicting Likelihood of Remaining Positive for Rheumatoid Arthritis-Related Autoantibodies Following Autoantibody Screening

Jill M. Norris1, Elizabeth A. Bemis1, M. Kristen Demoruelle2, Michael Weisman3, Jane H. Buckner4, Peter K. Gregersen5, Ted R Mikuls6, James R. O'Dell6, Richard M. Keating7, Kevin D. Deane8 and V. Michael Holers8, 1Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, 2Rheumatology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, 3Rheumatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 4Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason, Seattle, WA, 5Feinstein Insititute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, 6Rheumatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 7Division of Rheumatology, Scripps Health, La Jolla, CA, 8Division of Rheumatology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: autoantibodies, longitudinal studies and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Epidemiology and Public Health - Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: RA-related autoantibodies are typically elevated prior to the onset of RA. Screening for autoantibody (aAb) positive individuals is a means to assemble a cohort at very high risk for future RA for epidemiologic and intervention studies. However, little is known about the stability of RA-related aAbs over time in individuals without RA who screen positive in a non-clinical setting.

Methods: Studies of the Etiology of RA (SERA) prospectively follows subjects who are RA-free but are at increased risk for future RA because they are a first-degree relative (FDR) of an RA proband (n=1774), or are from a cohort enriched for HLA-DR4 alleles (n=631). We tested serum aAbs to CCP (CCP2 and/or CCP3.1), RF, and RF IgG, IgA and IgM isotypes. Positivity was based on cut-offs as defined by manufacturer’s recommendations (CCP and RF isotypes) or ACR recommendations (RF). Overall, 23% (551/2405) tested positive for at least one aAb during screening. To evaluate outcomes of aAb+ subjects identified via screening, the cohort was limited to those who had at least one follow-up visit after their 1staAb+ visit (n= 315). For prediction analyses, we explored high titer aAb, as defined by 2-times (2x) and 3-times (3x) the cutoff.

Results: Over a mean follow-up of 5.1 years, 146 (46.3%) remained aAb+ at all visits (Persistent), 61 (19.4%) were aAb+ again on at least one follow-up visit, but fluctuated between aAb negative and aAb+ during follow-up (Intermittently Positive), and 108 (34.3%) were seronegative on all follow-up visits (Reverter) (Table 1). To address the question as to what predicts a person will test aAb+ again in those who were screened-positive, we combined the Persistent and Intermittently Positive groups to form a group that was aAb+ on two or more occasions (n=207). To examine the likelihood of testing aAb+ again after a screened-positive test, we conducted bivariate logistic regression models with every variable listed in Table 1 as a potential predictor. Table 2 lists the variables significantly associated with testing positive again. Age, sex, race/ethnicity, FDR status, shared epitope status, ever smoking, high CRP, and joint signs were not associated with testing aAb+ after the initial screened aAb+ test.

Conclusion: In this cohort of at-risk individuals who screen aAb+, the presence of any aAb at > 2x cutoff at screening predicts who will test positive again, while a 3x cutoff does not improve prediction. Demographic and environmental exposures were not associated aAb+ persistence, perhaps due to their primary influence at other stages of disease, including the initial development of RA-related aAbs.

Table 1. Characteristics of Individuals in SERA who Tested Positive for an RA-related Autoantibody During Screening stratified by Autoantibody Status on Follow-up

Persistent

N = 146

Intermittently Positive

N = 61

Reverter

N = 108

Age at first positive visit (Mean±SD)

47.6±16.5

46.4±17.0

45.2±14.6

Number of visits (including screening) (Mean±SD)

3.4±1.7

4.7±1.5

2.9±1.3

Length of Follow-up in years (Mean±SD)

3.9 ±2.6

5.8±2.5

4.0±2.7

Sex (%female)

111 (76.0)

50 (82.0)

78 (72.2)

Race/Ethnicity (%Non-Hispanic White)

116 (79.5)

53 (86.9)

78 (72.2)

First Degree Relative of an RA Proband (%)

119 (81.5)

55 (90.2)

87 (80.6)

Shared Epitope positive (%)

70 (48.0)

39 (63.9)

64 (59.3)

Ever smoker (%)

51 (34.9)

23 (37.7)

42 (38.9)

CRP+ at first positive visit (%)

47 (32.2)

19 (31.2)

30 (27.8)

CCP+ at first positive visit† (%)

54 (37.0)

12 (19.7)

17 (15.7)

CCP+ > 2x cutoff at first positive visit† (%)

40 (27.4)

4 (6.6)

6 (5.6)

CCP+ >3x cutoff at first positive visit† (%)

32 (21.9)

2 (3.3)

6 (5.6)

RF+ at first positive visit (%)

53 (36.3)

18 (29.5)

27 (25.0)

RF+ > 2x cutoff at first positive visit (%)

25 (17.1)

4 (6.6)

4 (3.7)

RF+ > 3x cutoff at first positive visit (%)

14 (9.6)

2 (3.3)

3 (2.8)

RF isotype+ at first positive visit‡ (%)

98 (67.1)

43 (70.5)

73 (67.6)

RF isotype+ > 2x cutoff at first positive visit‡ (%)

51 (34.9)

13 (21.3)

11 (10.2)

RF isoty
pe+ > 3x cutoff at first positive visit‡ (%)

41 (28.1)

6 (9.8)

5 (4.6)

≥1 Swollen joint at first positive visit* (%)

13/121 (10.7)

8/51 (15.7)

10/90 (11.1)

≥1 Tender or swollen joint at first positive visit* (%)

34/121 (28.1)

11/51 (21.6)

26/90 (28.9)

†Either CCP2 or CCP3.1 ‡ IgM, IgG, or IgA *joints included are: wrist, MCP, PIP, MTP and elbow; 57 individuals excluded due to missing exam data.

 

Table 2. Factors associated with the likelihood of testing autoantibody positive after the first positive (screening) test

aAb status at first positive (screening) visit

OR (95% CI)*

p-value

Percentage who test aAb positive again

Any aAb+ (definition of cohort)

–

–

65.7%

Any aAb+ > 2x cutoff

5.50 (3.15-9.61)

<0.01

85.2%

Any aAb+ > 3x cutoff

4.49 (2.40-8.41)

<0.01

85.6%

CCP+ †

2.51 (1.38-4.54)

<0.01

79.5%

CCP+ > 2x cutoff †

4.59 (1.89-11.15)

<0.01

88.0%

CCP+ > 3x cutoff †

3.34 (1.36-8.23)

<0.01

85.0%

RF+

1.57 (0.93-2.64)

0.09

72.4%

RF+ > 2x cutoff

4.23 (1.45-12.38)

<0.01

87.9%

RF+ > 3x cutoff

4.23 (1.45-12.38)

0.08

84.2%

RF+ isotype ‡

1.02 (0.62-1.69)

0.92

65.9%

RF+ isotype >2x cutoff ‡

3.95 (1.98-7.87)

<0.01

85.3%

RF+ isotype >3x cutoff ‡

6.05 (2.33-15.72)

<0.01

90.4%

*OR represents the increased odds of testing positive again given their particular aAB+ status (and titer) at the first positive visit. †Either CCP2 or CCP3.1 ‡IgM, IgG, or IgA

Disclosure: J. M. Norris, None; E. A. Bemis, None; M. K. Demoruelle, None; M. Weisman, None; J. H. Buckner, None; P. K. Gregersen, None; T. R. Mikuls, None; J. R. O'Dell, Lilly, 5,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5,GlaxoSmithKline, 5,Coherus, 5,Medac, 5; R. M. Keating, None; K. D. Deane, Inova Diagnostics, Inc., 9; V. M. Holers, Patents, 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Norris JM, Bemis EA, Demoruelle MK, Weisman M, Buckner JH, Gregersen PK, Mikuls TR, O'Dell JR, Keating RM, Deane KD, Holers VM. Factors Predicting Likelihood of Remaining Positive for Rheumatoid Arthritis-Related Autoantibodies Following Autoantibody Screening [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/factors-predicting-likelihood-of-remaining-positive-for-rheumatoid-arthritis-related-autoantibodies-following-autoantibody-screening/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/factors-predicting-likelihood-of-remaining-positive-for-rheumatoid-arthritis-related-autoantibodies-following-autoantibody-screening/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology