ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2635

Exploring the Influence of Patient Perceptions On Medication Escalation in Daily Practice

Jos Hendrikx1, Wietske Kievit2, Jaap Fransen2 and Piet L.C.M. van Riel2, 1Rheumatology (470), Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 2Rheumatology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Decision analysis, patient questionnaires and quality of care

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Epidemiology and Health Services Research V: Rheumatoid Arthritis Management in the Treat-to-Target Era

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), patients’ and physicians’ perceptions of disease can differ and patients who are satisfied with their health do not tend to agree with escalation of drug therapy, even if disease activity is not low. It is hypothesized that patient acceptable symptom state, as well as perceived and expected change, influence patients’ willingness to alter therapy, in addition to disease activity state.

Objective: To investigate the influence of patient perceptions and disease activity on escalation of drug therapy in RA patients.

Methods: Consecutive RA patients attending the outpatient rheumatology clinic received standard clinical assessment including the DAS28 and medication changes. In addition, patients were asked 4 items regarding: perceived health state transition, satisfaction with their health state, willingness to change therapy and expected health state transition until the next visit. To investigate explanatory factors, logistic models predicting actual escalation of medication in daily practice and predicting patients’ self-reported willingness to escalate therapy were fitted by means of forward selection. Predictors for the models were: sex, age, rheumatoid factor, disease duration, DAS28 response since last visit, attained DAS28 level and the above mentioned patient perception items. Escalation of DMARD or biologic medication was defined as an increase in frequency and/or dose of medication, or starting a new one, between the current and next visit.

Results: In total 422 RA patients; 63.3% female, 67.1% rheumatoid factor positive were included in the analysis. Mean (SD) DAS28 at visit, age and disease duration in years were: 3.09(1.24), 58.6(12.95), 9.72(9.25), respectively. In total 185 (43.8%) patients had a DAS28>3.2, of whom 96 (59.1%) were satisfied with their health status if this would not change until the next visit, and a majority of patients 132 (71.4%) did not want to change their medication. Table 1 shows the final model for therapy escalation with a clear independent relationship of patient reported willingness to escalate therapy. Table 2 shows the model with willingness to escalate therapy as the outcome. All patient perception measures exhibited significant independent associations, of which patient satisfaction was strongest. Figure 1 shows a model of medication escalation in daily practice.

Conclusion: Patients’ willingness to escalate therapy is strongly associated with actual escalation of therapy in daily practice, independent of clinical parameters. In turn, patients’ willingness to escalate therapy is primarily associated with patients’ satisfaction with their health state, perceived change and expected change. Treat to target interventions should address patients’ perceptions of their disease, and the related health goals patients aim to achieve, next to the level of disease activity attained.


Disclosure:

J. Hendrikx,
None;

W. Kievit,
None;

J. Fransen,
None;

P. L. C. M. van Riel,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/exploring-the-influence-of-patient-perceptions-on-medication-escalation-in-daily-practice/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology