ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1783

Experience of Pregnant Rheumatology Outpatients from a Tertiary Hospital in New York City During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Bessie Stamm1, Gregory Vitone2, Marianna Frey3, JoAnn Vega1, Jane Salmon3, Mary Crow3, Vivian Bykerk3, Michael Lockshin1, Lisa Sammaritano1, Lisa Mandl3 and Medha Barbhaiya1, 1Hospital for Special Surgery, Barbara Volcker Center for Women and Rheumatic Diseases, New York, NY, 2Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, 3Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: COVID-19, pregnancy

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2020

Title: Reproductive Issues in Rheumatic Disorders Poster

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the experience of pregnant rheumatology patients during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City.

Methods: We emailed a secure web-based survey to 26,045 patients aged ≥18 years who were evaluated at least once by a rheumatologist from April 1, 2018-April 1, 2020 at a tertiary academic center in New York City. Patients received three secure e-mail invitations to complete the survey; a subset of patients with missing or incorrect e-mails were contacted by telephone. We collected detailed information including COVID-19 exposure and symptoms, rheumatic disease history and medications, sociodemographic factors, and 5 domains from the PROMIS-29 to assess psychosocial factors. We requested pregnancy data from any women aged 18 to 50. Women were asked to indicate pregnancy status on January 1, 2020 or at the time of survey completion. T-tests and Chi-square tests were used when appropriate to compare pregnant and non-pregnant patients.

Results: 6,908 patients responded to our survey overall, of whom 1,510 were women aged 18 to 50 (22%). 61/1,510 (4%) were either pregnant on January 1, 2020 or pregnant at the time of completing the survey. Mean age of the 61 pregnant women was 36.1±4.9 years, 74% were white, 85% not Hispanic or Latino, and 88% were married/partnered (p < 0.001). Pregnant survey respondents were significantly younger, more likely to be married, have higher household income, and less likely to be Hispanic than non-pregnant patients (Table 1).Although fewer pregnant women took biologics, DMARDs, or corticosteroids the differences were not significant.Nearly one-third of patients in both groups reported taking antimalarials in the previous 6 months. Both groups lived with an average of 2.3 other people, and a similar percent had confirmed or suspected COVID-19 (by positive nasopharyngeal PCR test or physician indicated) (8% and 11%). Among patients who were employed, significantly more pregnant patients indicated a high risk of COVDI-19 exposure at work. Depression and pain interference were significantly worse in non-pregnant patients based on PROMIS-29 scores, but not clinically significant(Table 2).In the pregnancy group, 57% noted changes to prenatal OB/GYN care during the COVID-19 pandemic; in-person OB/GYN visits were rescheduled to telemedicine visits (28%) and some in-person OB/GYN visits were cancelled and not rescheduled (16%). By the time of survey completion, 22/61 pregnancies were complete, with a mean gestational age of 38.1±1weeks. Pregnancy outcomes included: 10 (45%) vaginal deliveries, 5 (23%) C-Sections, and 3 (14%) miscarriage/termination. 23% of women who delivered stated the pandemic affected their deliveries, with the most frequent reason being no visitors permitted in the hospital or spouses needing to depart shortly after delivery (Table 3).

Conclusion: During the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City, pregnant rheumatology patients had unique experiences that influenced their prenatal OB/GYN care and pregnancy experience. Future longitudinal studies will investigate the underlying risk factors and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pregnancy outcomes in rheumatic disease patients. 


Disclosure: B. Stamm, None; G. Vitone, None; M. Frey, None; J. Vega, None; J. Salmon, UCB, 1, 2, BMS, 1, 2, Abbott, 1, Pfizer, 1, Johnson & Johnson, 1, Lilly, 1, Merck, 1, Regeneron, 1; M. Crow, Bristol Myers Squibb, 5, Gilead, 5, Lilly, 5, Principia, 5; V. Bykerk, Amgen, 2, 5, UCB, 5, National Institute of Health, 2, 9, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, 2, 5, Gilead, 5, Pfizer, 5, Brainstorm Therapeutics, 1, 3; M. Lockshin, None; L. Sammaritano, None; L. Mandl, Annals of Internal Medicine, 9, UpToDate, 7, Regeneron, 2; M. Barbhaiya, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Stamm B, Vitone G, Frey M, Vega J, Salmon J, Crow M, Bykerk V, Lockshin M, Sammaritano L, Mandl L, Barbhaiya M. Experience of Pregnant Rheumatology Outpatients from a Tertiary Hospital in New York City During the COVID-19 Pandemic [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/experience-of-pregnant-rheumatology-outpatients-from-a-tertiary-hospital-in-new-york-city-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/experience-of-pregnant-rheumatology-outpatients-from-a-tertiary-hospital-in-new-york-city-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology