ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0521

Examination of Differential Response to Treatment with Mycophenolate Mofetil in Black and White Patients with Systemic Sclerosis

Lauren Smith1, Jamie Perin2, Adrianne Woods2, Fredrick Wigley3, Laura Hummers4 and Ami Shah5, 1Johns Hopkins, District Heights, MD, 2John Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 3Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 4Johns Hopkins Univerisity, Baltimore, MD, 5Johns Hopkins Rheumatology, Baltimore, MD

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: interstitial lung disease, race/ethnicity, Scleroderma

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 12, 2022

Title: Abstracts: Systemic Sclerosis and Related Disorders – Clinical I: Trials and Therapeutics

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 3:00PM-4:30PM

Background/Purpose: Black patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) develop SSc at a younger age and have more severe disease than White patients, including a higher prevalence of diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc) and interstitial lung disease (ILD). We sought to harness data from a large, diverse longitudinal prospective cohort to investigate whether Black and White scleroderma patients have different therapeutic responses to mycophenolate mofetil.

Methods: Self-identified Black and White patients with SSc who had exposure to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) were selected from the Johns Hopkins Scleroderma Center (JHSC) Research Registry. Patients without at least one PFT and mRSS measurement prior to or within one month of initiation of MMF therapy were excluded. We restricted our study population to patients who presented to our Center within 5 years of disease onset. Our primary outcome measures were absolute change in forced vital capacity (FVC) % predicted and modified Rodnan skin scores (mRSS) over a 5-year period.

Results: 718 patients with SSc who self-identified as either Black (n=152) or White (n=566) were exposed to MMF. Black patients were younger at SSc onset than White patients (mean (SD) 40.1 (13.3) years vs. 47.3 (13.1)), though both groups presented to our Center at a similar disease duration (Table 1). Both groups were comparable in terms of sex and proportion of patients with diffuse cutaneous disease. The most common autoantibody was anti-Scl-70 (46%) for Black patients and anti-RNA polymerase III (46%) for White patients. The majority of subjects in both groups achieved the maximum dose of MMF (3g) for at least 3 months (55% for Black patients, 52% for White patients). In the cohort of patients who had baseline and follow up FVC, the average baseline FVC% predicted was 66.7 (20.0) for Black patients and 83.2 (19.0) for White patients prior to treatment with MMF (Table 2). At 1 year, the modeled absolute change in FVC% predicted for Black patients was +1.7 (1.7) compared to -1.2 (0.7) for White patients (p< 0.001). By year 5, the modeled absolute change in FVC% predicted for Black patients was +1.7 (1.7) compared to -4.9 (0.7) for White patients (p< 0.001). Among patients with dcSSc, the baseline mRSS was 13.3 (11.0) for Black patients and 17.7 (13.7) for White patients (p=0.212). At 1 year, the modeled absolute change in mRSS from baseline was -3.1(1.7) for Black patients and -3.4(1.3) for White patients (p=0.907). By year 5, the modeled absolute change in mRSS for Black patients was -5.4 (1.9) compared to -9.8 (1.3) for White patients (p=0.133).

Conclusion: There is a significant difference in baseline FVC% predicted between Black and White patients, but once treated with MMF, Black patients’ FVC% predicted appears to stabilize while White patients have a slow decline. Both groups show a similar reduction in mRSS skin scores with treatment of MMF. Overall, these results suggest that worse pulmonary outcomes for Black patients are not due to reduced therapeutic efficacy but may be due to more severe disease at presentation. Ongoing work is needed to investigate if there is a biologic basis for this differential disease severity and the role of social determinants of health as predictors of worse outcomes in Black versus White SSc patients.

Supporting image 1

Table 1. Demographics and clinical characteristics for 718 SSc patients by race

Supporting image 2

Table 2. Modeled absolute change in percent FVC and mRSS from start of MMF.

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: L. Smith, None; J. Perin, None; A. Woods, None; F. Wigley, None; L. Hummers, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Cumberland Pharmaceuticals, Kadmon Corporation, Medpace, CSL Behring, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Horizon Pharmaceuticals; A. Shah, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Medpace/Eicos, Kadmon Corporation.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Smith L, Perin J, Woods A, Wigley F, Hummers L, Shah A. Examination of Differential Response to Treatment with Mycophenolate Mofetil in Black and White Patients with Systemic Sclerosis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/examination-of-differential-response-to-treatment-with-mycophenolate-mofetil-in-black-and-white-patients-with-systemic-sclerosis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/examination-of-differential-response-to-treatment-with-mycophenolate-mofetil-in-black-and-white-patients-with-systemic-sclerosis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology