ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2272

Evolution of Methotrexate and Prednisone Use in the Era of Biologic Therapy: 15-Year Findings from a Large Rheumatoid Arthritis Registry

Dimitrios Pappas1, George Reed2, Kevin kane3, Michael Weinblatt4 and Joel Kremer5, 1CorEvitas, New York, NY, 2University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, 3University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, 4Brigham and Women's Hospital/ Harvard Medical School, Waban, MA, 5The Corrona Research Foundation, Delray Beach, FL

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 18, 2024

Title: RA – Treatment Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Methotrexate (MTX) continues to be the cornerstone therapy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and is usually the first conventional synthetic (cs) DMARD to be initiated, frequently in combination with  steroids. This study investigated the evolution of MTX/prednisone use over the last fifteen years in the context of the increasing availability of biologic (b) and targeted synthetic (ts) DMARDs.

Methods: Data from patients (pts) enrolled in the CorEvitas RA registry over a 15-year period were analyzed. Pts initially treated with MTX who later initiated b/ts therapy were included. Details of MTX and prednisone treatment at the initiation of the first b/ts DMARD were described. Differences were compared per 3-year periods from 2008 to 2022.  In addition, time to first b/ts agent was described per year from 2006 to 2020.  Cox regression analysis compared the time to biologic per year adjusting for pertinent covariates.  Methotrexate and steroid continuation rates and dosages after the initiation of first b/ts DMARD was described by year.

Adjusted coefficients and odds ratios (OR) for the use of MTX / prednisone prior and after the first b/ts initiation were adjusted for pertinent covariates.

Results: The analysis included 5498 pts. Disease duration at the time of first b/ts DMARD prescription decreased in more recent years. Mean Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and the proportion of pts with moderate/high disease activity at b/ts DMARD initiation remained relatively unchanged. MTX dosage remained stable, but the rate of concurrent prednisone use decreased significantly over time (adjusted OR: 0.958 (0.010), p < 0.001). Pts on prednisone received a relatively stable mean prednisone dose over the years (6.9 to 7.7 mg). The proportion of pts on MTX in combination with other csDMARDs remained consistent. (Table 1).

The time to the initiation of the first b/ts DMARD decreased between 2006 and 2020 (Figure 1). In earlier years (2006-2009) 25% of pts started a b/ts DMARD 22.5 months after MTX initiation; in recent years this interval decreased to 9 months.  Cox regression revealed a per year Hazard Ratio of 1.03, (95% CI: 1.02 -1.05)

The percentage of pts continuing MTX after the initiation of first b/ts DMARD decreased over the years (adjusted OR: 0.943 (0.018), p = 0.003) but the dosage of those remaining on MTX remained stable (Figure 3). The percentage of pts continuing prednisone after b/ts DMARD initiation was lower over time (adjusted OR: 0.942 (0.015), p < 0.001). The dosage of those remaining on prednisone decreased in recent years (β= 0.264 (0.132), p = 0.045) (Figure 2).

Conclusion: The utilization of MTX in RA treatment remained consistent over the years, with stable MTX dosages and disease activity at biologic initiation. The percentage of pts on prednisone decreased over time but among users dosage remained above the recommended levels. Pts started their first b/ts DMARD earlier in their disease course and the time between MTX and first b/ts DMARD initiation gradually decreased. Statistically more patients discontinued MTX/ steroids after the prescription of b/tsDMARDs over time. Further research is warranted to determine the impact of the observed changes on pts outcomes.

Supporting image 1

Table 1: Patient characteristics in year cohorts prior to/at the time of initiation of first b/tsDMARD

Supporting image 2

Figure 1: Time (in months) between initiation of MTX therapy to initiation of the first biologic categorized by year. Note: y-axis of survival curve begins at 0.40

Supporting image 3

Figure 2: Methotrexate and steroids rate of use and dose the period after the initiation of first b/ts DMARD by year of initiation


Disclosures: D. Pappas: CorEvitas, 3, 11, Corrona Research Foundation, 4; G. Reed: CorEviitas, LLC, 2, Corrona Research Foundation, 2; K. kane: None; M. Weinblatt: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, 5, Aclaris, 2, Amgen, 2, Aqtual, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, 5, Canfite, 11, Eli Lilly, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, Inmedix, 11, Johnson and Johnson, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, Pfizer, 2, Prometheus, 2, Rani, 2, Revolo, 2, Sanofi, 2, Sci Rhom, 2, Scipher, 2, 11, Set Point, 2; J. Kremer: Eli Lilly, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Pappas D, Reed G, kane K, Weinblatt M, Kremer J. Evolution of Methotrexate and Prednisone Use in the Era of Biologic Therapy: 15-Year Findings from a Large Rheumatoid Arthritis Registry [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evolution-of-methotrexate-and-prednisone-use-in-the-era-of-biologic-therapy-15-year-findings-from-a-large-rheumatoid-arthritis-registry/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evolution-of-methotrexate-and-prednisone-use-in-the-era-of-biologic-therapy-15-year-findings-from-a-large-rheumatoid-arthritis-registry/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology