ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2082

Evaluations of Social Support Are Associated with Well-Being Outcomes in Women with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)

Stacey E. Morrison1, Monique A.M. Gignac2, Paul R. Fortin3 and Dorcas Beaton4, 1Div Rheumatology Rm MP-10-304, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Instititue for Work and Health, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3Medicine, CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada, 4Mobility Program Clinical Research Unit, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Social support, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and well-being

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: ARHP II: Lupus

Session Type: ARHP Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose : Research on SLE and social support has often focused on the total amount of support provided. However, studies also report that some individuals feel under-supported whereas others feel too dependent on others. This study examined: 1) perceived support needs and support received for different domains (e.g., work, household activities) and types of support (instrumental, emotional and informational); 2) perceived concordant and discordant support; and 3) the relationship of support satisfaction with well-being (depression, life satisfaction, meaning of illness, illness intrusiveness) in women with SLE.

Methods : Women with SLE were recruited from the University of Toronto Lupus Cohort and completed a web or paper-based survey. Demographic (age, education), clinical (pain, fatigue, disease activity), and psychological perceptions (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), life satisfaction, positive meaning of illness, illness intrusiveness) data were collected. Five domains of support were assessed (work/school, family, recreation, finance & household) along with 3 types of social support (instrumental, emotional & informational). Congruent and discordant support perceptions were created by examining needs and receipt for support, as well as support satisfaction.  Separate analyses of variance (ANOVAs) examined differences in support and well-being within each domain and for each type of support.

Results : A total of 163 women with SLE, aged 50.7±16.1 years, with mean disease duration 21.9±13.7 years & mean disease activity ±3 months 2.4±2.6 on a 10-pt VAS responded. Participants reporting unsatisfactory support in at least one domain represented 47.8%, 43.1% & 53.9% of the sample for instrumental, emotional and informational support, respectively.

Although many women reported congruence between support needed and received, women often reported being under-supported in at least one domain of life. Few women reported being over-supported or dependent on others. In the work/school domain, depression and illness intrusiveness scores were significantly greater for those who viewed any type of social support as unsatisfactory compared to those receiving satisfactory support (all p-values < 0.01).  Life satisfaction and meaning of illness scores were also significantly lower for those who reported dissatisfaction with their instrumental, emotional or informational support (all p-values < 0.001) in the work/education domain. Similar findings were found for other domains.  

Conclusion: Previous research has often focused on the amount of support received. This research highlights that support needs vary and it is dissatisfaction with social support that often arises as a lack of congruence with support needed and received, not the amount of support, that is associated with well-being. These findings have implications for interventions. Further research, especially longitudinal studies, are needed to examine changes in support and well-being.


Disclosure: S. E. Morrison, None; M. A. M. Gignac, None; P. R. Fortin, GlaxoSmithKline, 5,Lilly, 5,AbbVie, 5; D. Beaton, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Morrison SE, Gignac MAM, Fortin PR, Beaton D. Evaluations of Social Support Are Associated with Well-Being Outcomes in Women with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluations-of-social-support-are-associated-with-well-being-outcomes-in-women-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-sle/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluations-of-social-support-are-associated-with-well-being-outcomes-in-women-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-sle/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology