ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1363

Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome of Baricitinib in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis from Multi-center Collaborative Study in Japan: Sub-analysis for Difficult-to-treat RA.

Naoki Kondo and Nariaki Hao, Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Niigata University Medical and Dental General Hospital, Niigata, Japan

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: clinical trial, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 27, 2025

Title: (1347–1375) Rheumatoid Arthritis – Treatment Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: The aim is to examine the efficacy and safety of baricitinib (BARI) in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in real clinical practice and is to perform a subgroup analysis dividing cases into difficult-to-treat RA (D2TRA) and non-D2TRA.

Methods: This study involved 192 patients with RA (39 men, 153 women) who were administered with BARI. We examined patient background, treatment response at 52 weeks after initiation, continuation rate, and adverse events. We analyzed cases categorized as meeting the definition of D2TRA and those that did not in a similar manner.

Results: The mean age of enrolled patients was 66.0±13 years, and the mean disease duration was 13.4±11.4 years. Rheumatoid factor and anti-CCP antibody were positive in 77% and 76% of patients, respectively, with 9.9% of patients being negative for both antibodies. Prednisolone (PSL) and methotrexate (MTX) were co-administered in 74 cases (5.5±3.3 mg/day) and 85 cases (7.9±2.7 mg/week), respectively. There were 56 naive cases of biological agents/JAK inhibitors, 58 cases who received a second agent, and 78 cases who were introduced to agents after the third. The continuation rate at 52 weeks after starting BARI was 76%, and CDAI and DAS28-ESR(4) significantly decreased from 17.3±11.2, 4.0±1.5 to 5.2±4.5 (p< 0.05), 2.6±0.9 (p< 0.05), respectively. The number of PSL co-administered cases at 52 weeks decreased to 38 cases (3.7±2.1 mg). The occurrence of herpes zoster during the observation period was 4 cases (2.1%). Events leading to the discontinuation of BARI included 32 cases of primary ineffectiveness, 3 cases of secondary ineffectiveness, 10 cases of adverse events (disseminated herpes zoster, pericarditis, dizziness, onset of dermatomyositis, diverticulitis, death due to pneumonia, urticaria, anemia, ileus, mood discomfort), and 1 unknown case. There were 62 cases of D2TRA and 130 of non-D2TRA. No significant differences were found in the ratio of females, age at initiation, disease duration of RA, proportion of the initial BARI dose of 4 mg/day, positive rate or titer of anti-CCP antibodies. While there was no difference in the positive rate of rheumatoid factor, the RF levels were significantly higher in D2TRA (262 vs 138 IU/l, p< 0.05). The continuation rate at 52 weeks after starting BARI was 62% for D2TRA and 81% for non-D2TRA, but no significant difference was observed. CDAI significantly decreased from initiation to 52 weeks, with no significant difference between the two groups. The DAS28-ESR(4) before initiation was 4.27 for D2TRA and 4.00 for non-D2TRA, showing no significant difference, but it was significantly higher for D2TRA at 52 weeks after initiation (2.94 vs 2.47, p< 0.05). The DAS remission rate was 40% for D2TRA and 65% for non-D2TRA. The ineffectiveness discontinuation cases were 26% for D2TRA and 15% for non-D2TRA. The discontinuation cases due to adverse events were 8% for D2TRA and 4.6% for non-D2TRA, with no significant differences observed.

Conclusion: BARI significantly reduced disease activity and showed a high continuation rate. Serious adverse events were infrequent, confirming efficacy and safety in real clinical practice. BARI did not demonstrate the comparable efficacy in D2TRA cases compared to non-D2TRA.

Supporting image 1Table1. The demographic data of difficult-to-treat RA (D2TRA) and non D2TRA groups. Rheumatoid factor value at the baseline in D2TRA shows significantly higher than that in nonD2TRA.

Supporting image 2Figure 1. The time course of DAS28-ESR(4) after the baricitinib. In the administration of baricitinib, no significant difference between the difficult-to- treat RA (D2TRA) and non D2TRA. However, 4, 12, 26, and 52 weeks after the administration, DAS28-ESR(4) in D2TRA is significantly higher than that in nonD2TRA. N.S.; not significant difference, *; p < 0.05, **; p < 0.01.


Disclosures: N. Kondo: None; N. Hao: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kondo N, Hao N. Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome of Baricitinib in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis from Multi-center Collaborative Study in Japan: Sub-analysis for Difficult-to-treat RA. [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-the-clinical-outcome-of-baricitinib-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-from-multi-center-collaborative-study-in-japan-sub-analysis-for-difficult-to-treat-ra/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-the-clinical-outcome-of-baricitinib-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-from-multi-center-collaborative-study-in-japan-sub-analysis-for-difficult-to-treat-ra/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology