ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meeting Abstracts
    • All Meetings
    • PRSYM 2026
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • Download Abstract Supplements
  • Keyword Index
  • Search
  • My Favorites
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all favorites

Abstract Number: 2937

Evaluation of Referral Models for Axial Spondyloarthritis in Primary Care in the Spondyloarthritis Caught Early Cohort

Ozair Abawi1, Rosaline van den Berg1, Désirée van der Heijde2 and Floris van Gaalen1, 1Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 2Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

Meeting: ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2014

Keywords: Referrals and axial spondyloarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Spondyloarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis V - Clinical Aspects and Treatment

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose  Several models have been proposed to refer patients (pts) with possible axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) from primary care to the rheumatologist. Aim of the study was to evaluate performance of referral models for axSpA in the SPondyloArthritis Caught Early (SPACE) cohort.

Methods  Ten referral models were found in literature and tested in the Leiden SPACE cohort, including pts with back pain (≥3 months, ≤2 years, onset <45 years; n=192) referred to the rheumatology outpatient clinic of the LUMC. Imaging was omitted from all models if included as a referral parameter, as it is unfeasible for screening in primary care. [table 1]

Performance of the models was evaluated (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, positive likelihood ratio) using classification by ASAS axSpA criteria as external standard. For pts not fulfilling the ASAS criteria who are referred, post-test probability for axSpA was calculated based on the LR product for presence of SpA features. A LR product ≥78 equals a post-test probability ≥80% and was used as cut-off for probable axSpA. Pts who were incorrectly not referred met the ASAS axSpA criteria by fulfilling the clinical arm only or the imaging arm (imaging arm only or both arms). [table 2]

Results
 In total, 74/192 pts fulfilled ASAS axSpA criteria; 48 with positive imaging (n=15 radiographic sacroiliitis). Most models performed well regarding sensitivity/specificity. Braun alt. model has the most balanced sensitivity/specificity and highest LR+. All models that include HLA B27 miss axSpA pts with positive imaging, 14-23% with radiographic sacroiliitis (depending on the model). PPV of the models is low, indicating that many pts are referred despite not fulfilling axSpA criteria. However, 6-16% (depending on the model) of these pts have a post-test probability ≥80% for axSpA. This reflects that these pts are rightly referred, despite not fulfilling the axSpA criteria.

Conclusion  Most referral models performed well in the SPACE cohort. However, this cohort includes pts already referred from primary care, probably causing overestimation of performance of all models. All models miss pts fulfilling the ASAS imaging arm, 14-23% of which have radiographic sacroiliitis, which is highly undesirable. Moreover, large numbers of pts referred unnecessarily might lead to a burden for health care systems. Further studies should be conducted in primary care to evaluate these models in their target population. 

References
1Brandt ARD 2007;66:1479-84
2Braun Rheum 2013;52:1418-24
3Poddubnyy J Rheum 2011;38:2452-60
4Sieper ARD 2013;72:1621-7
5Weel AC&R 2013-09-19


Disclosure:

O. Abawi,
None;

R. van den Berg,
None;

D. van der Heijde,
None;

F. van Gaalen,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2014

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-referral-models-for-axial-spondyloarthritis-in-primary-care-in-the-spondyloarthritis-caught-early-cohort/

Advanced Search

My Favorites

Save and print abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract (must have cookies enabled in browser). See saved favorites.

Abstract Policies

  • ACR Convergence Abstract Embargo Policies
  • ACR Convergence Abstract Permissions & Reprints
  • PRSYM Abstract Policies

ACR Convergence. Where Rheumatology Meets

ACR Convergence 2026

Join us November 6-11 in Orlando, Florida.
See Registration Information

  • Contact ACR
  • Privacy Policy
  • ACR Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2026 American College of Rheumatology