ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2938

Evaluation of American College of Rheumatology Provisional Composite Response Index in Systemic Sclerosis (ACR CRISS) in a Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial

Dinesh Khanna1, Celia J. F. Lin2, Helen Spotswood3, Jeffrey Siegel2, Angelika Jahreis2, Christopher P. Denton4 and Daniel E. Furst5, 1Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Scleroderma Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 2Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, 3Roche Products Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom, 4University College London, London, United Kingdom, 5University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Systemic sclerosis, tocilizumab and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Wednesday, October 24, 2018

Title: 6W012 ACR Abstract: Systemic Sclerosis & Rel D/O III:Cohort Study, Biomarkers, & Response(2934–2939)

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 9:00AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Treatment with the IL-6 receptor inhibitor tocilizumab (TCZ) in early progressive systemic sclerosis (SSc; focuSSced trial; NCT02453256) resulted in numeric improvements in skin sclerosis and clinically meaningful forced vital capacity (FVC) results at week 48 (data on file). The combined response index for SSc (ACR CRISS), a composite outcome measure for trials in SSc,1 is a 2-step process that assigns a probability of improvement for each patient (pt) ranging from 0 [no improvement] to 1 [marked improvement]. Step 1 assesses clinically meaningful decline in cardio-pulmonary-renal involvement with a probability of 0. For remaining pts, the probability of improvement examines change from baseline in 5 variables: modified Rodnan skin score, FVC%, pt and physician global assessments (PtGA, MDGA), and HAQ-DI. CRISS distinguished between TCZ and placebo (PBO) in the faSScinate trial.2 We prospectively assessed the performance of ACR CRISS, an exploratory outcome in focuSSced, at week 48; this is the first time ACR CRISS has been prospectively evaluated in a phase 3 trial in SSc.

Methods: Pts ≥18 years of age with active SSc were randomly assigned 1:1 to TCZ 162 mg or PBO subcutaneously every week for 48 weeks. Step 1 for ACR CRISS was captured prospectively with blinded review of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs between medical monitors and the lead investigator. Step 2 was calculated as defined.1 The van Elteren test was used to assess whether differences existed between TCZ and PBO groups in the ACR CRISS score in its continuous form. The analysis included all pts who received study treatment, stratified by baseline IL-6 levels (<10; ≥10 pg/mL) with no imputation for missing data.

Results: In total, 210 pts (104 TCZ, 106 PBO) received study treatment; 13 pts in the PBO group and 6 in the TCZ group met the predefined definition of worsening cardio-pulmonary-renal involvement (step 1) and were given a score of 0. Using the ACR CRISS as a continuous measure, scores favored TCZ over PBO at week 48: median (IQR), 0.89 (0.09-1.00) vs 0.25 (0.00-0.99) (p = 0.023; Figure). In the binary form of CRISS, 51% of pts in the TCZ group vs 37% in the PBO group achieved the cutoff of ≥0.60 at week 48 (difference, 13.9; 95% CI, 1.0-26.8; p = 0.035).

Conclusion: In analysis of patient-level data from the focuSSced trial, more pts had cardio-pulmonary-renal involvement in the PBO group than in the TCZ group (captured by step 1). Additionally, step 2 CRISS score distinguished TCZ from PBO. The focuSSced study validates the ACR CRISS end point for the first time in an independent prospective clinical trial and highlights the importance of step 1 as an indicator of reduced organ progression during 48 weeks of treatment. References: 1. Khanna D et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 299-311. 2. Khanna D et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69(suppl 10). Abstract 2981. Acknowledgment: focuSSced clinical trial investigators.

 


Disclosure: D. Khanna, None; C. J. F. Lin, Genentech, Inc., 3; H. Spotswood, Roche, 1,Roche, 3; J. Siegel, Genentech, Inc., 1,Genentech, Inc., 3; A. Jahreis, Roche, 1,Genentech, Inc., 3; C. P. Denton, GSK, CSF Behring, Inventiva, 2,Roche/Genentech, Actelion, GSK, Sanofi, Inventiva, CSL Behring, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, 5; D. E. Furst, Roche/Genentech, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Khanna D, Lin CJF, Spotswood H, Siegel J, Jahreis A, Denton CP, Furst DE. Evaluation of American College of Rheumatology Provisional Composite Response Index in Systemic Sclerosis (ACR CRISS) in a Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-american-college-of-rheumatology-provisional-composite-response-index-in-systemic-sclerosis-acr-criss-in-a-phase-3-randomized-controlled-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-american-college-of-rheumatology-provisional-composite-response-index-in-systemic-sclerosis-acr-criss-in-a-phase-3-randomized-controlled-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology