ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 163

Evaluating Allopurinol Therapy and Serum Uric Acid Levels in Medicare Beneficiaries with Gout

Melea Ward1, Anthony M. Louder2, Keith A. Szymanski3 and Leonardo Tamariz4, 1Competitive Health Analytics, Louisville, KY, 2Competitive Health Analytics, Inc., Louisville, KY, 3Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc., Deerfield, IL, 4University of Miami, Miami, FL

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: gout, treatment and uric acid

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Higher serum uric acid levels in gout patients have been associated with an increased frequency and risk of gout flares and greater subsequent healthcare costs. Despite the wide availability of allopurinol, achieving a therapeutic serum uric acid (sUA) level remains problematic for clinicians and patients. The objectives of this study included identifying predictors of an sUA response to allopurinol and investigating the associated healthcare costs.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of a large health benefits company was conducted among Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug (MAPD) plan patients with gout newly initiated on allopurinol between 1/1/08 and 12/31/10. Patients were separated into two cohorts defined by their sUA response to allopurinol (sUA < 6 mg/dL or sUA > 6 mg/dL). Mean allopurinol adherence, as measured by proportion of days covered (PDC), was reported at 12 months follow-up. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with allopurinol response. A generalized linear model was developed to assess the association between allopurinol response and total healthcare costs.

Results: Of the 2,703 patients initiated on allopurinol, 57% had a baseline sUA and 33% had sUA ≤ 6 mg/dL in the follow-up period. Higher adherence was associated with achieving an sUA < 6 mg/dL compared to > 6 mg/dL (PDC=0.74 and 0.59, respectively, p<.0001). Predictors of sUA < 6 mg/dL included female sex, higher allopurinol PDC, and allopurinol dose  >100 mg/day (OR:1.74, CI:1.41-2.13; OR:12.28, CI:8.25-18.28; OR:5.84, CI:4.73-7.20, respectively). Hispanic ethnicity, higher baseline sUA, renal impairment (Stage 3 vs. Stage 1), colchicine use, and NSAID use were associated with lower odds of responding to allopurinol therapy (OR:0.32, CI:0.14-0.76; OR:0.60, CI:0.56-0.66; OR:0.41, CI:0.30-0.55; OR:0.79, CI:0.65-0.97; OR:0.68, CI:0.55-0.85, respectively). There were no significant differences in total healthcare costs between the two cohorts.

Conclusion: A large percentage of patients initiated on allopurinol did not have adequate sUA monitoring, and did not achieve an sUA < 6 mg/dL. Drivers of a therapeutic response included increased adherence and dose escalation. This study demonstrates that ample opportunity exists for clinicians and patients to improve sUA monitoring and treatment adherence when initiating urate lowering therapy.


Disclosure:

M. Ward,

Competitive Health Analytics, Inc.,

3;

A. M. Louder,

Competitive Health Analytics, Inc.,

3;

K. A. Szymanski,

Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc.,

3;

L. Tamariz,

Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc.,

2.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluating-allopurinol-therapy-and-serum-uric-acid-levels-in-medicare-beneficiaries-with-gout/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology