ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2414

Etanercept in Mono Therapy or in Combination with MTX: Results from a Sub Analysis of a German Non-Interventional Study

Karl Heinz Goettl1, Markus Gaubitz2, Andreas Krause3, Udo Lendl4, Ralph Lippe4, Thomas Meng4 and Peter-Andreas Loeschmann5, 1Joint practice for internal medicine, Passau, Germany, 2Academy of manual diagnostic at University of Münster, Münster, Germany, 3Konigstr. 63, Immanuel Krankenhaus Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 4Pfizer Pharma GmbH, Berlin, Germany, 5Loeschmann, Berlin, Germany

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: etanercept, observation and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects (ACR): Impact of Various Interventions and Therapeutic Approaches

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose

Although a combination with MTX is recommended for all biologics, data from different registries around the world show that in real life around 30% of all RA patients are treated in mono therapy. However, data on safety and efficacy of Etanercept (ETN) as mono therapy in dally practice are rare.

Methods

Adults with RA newly initiating ETN have been included into this non-interventional study.

Due to the non-interventional nature of the study, no specific requirements were specified with regard to the management of treatment. The physician could decide on dosing and the duration of treatment according to the treatment needs of each individual patient. At seven data collection points the course of the disease was documented for up to 52 weeks. Safety, efficacy as well as health outcome parameters have been assessed.

Results

4871 patients have been included into this study. 1090 of these have continuously been  treated with ETN and 1441 with ETN + MTX. There have been no statistically differences regarding all baseline characteristics. The mean disease duration was 10.6±10.3 years in the ETN and  9.7±8.9 years in the ETN + MTX group. They have been pretreated with 2.9±1.6 and 2.7±1.2 DMARDs respectively. From a mean baseline value of 5.5±1.3 and 5.3±1.3 score points, the DAS28 continually decreased to 3.4±1.4 and 3.2±1.3 at visit 7. At week 52 slightly less patients with ETN reached DAS28 remission (DAS28<2,6) as with ETN+MTX (32.5% [29.0-36.1%] vs. 35.4% [32.5-38.3%]). Concurrently with the DAS28 also the mean disease activity (patient global assessment, visual analogue scale VAS), pain (VAS) and fatigue (VAS) improved in both treatment groups. Duration of morning stiffness decreased in the ETN group from 78.7±88.1 to 26.2±50.6 min and in the ETN + MTX group from 72.6±81.1 to 21.8±50.6 min.  38.4 % [35.1 – 41.7%] of patients with ETN reached a functional remission (FFbH) at week 52 (vs. 44.3 % [41.5 – 47.2%] under ETN+MTX therapy). In both groups the treatment was well tolerated and no new safety signals have been observed.

Conclusion

Etanercept rapidly reduces diseases activity in combination with MTX as well as in mono therapy . Abaout half of the patients stay on their initial  treatment regime (mono or combination with MTX) in daily practice over 52 weeks. Within this study no new safety signals occurred and Etanercept was well tolerated in mono and combination therapy.


Disclosure:

K. H. Goettl,

Pfizer Inc, Roche, Janssen -Cilag, MSD,

5,

Pfizer Inc, Abbvie,

8;

M. Gaubitz,

Pfizer Inc; Abbvie, Chugai, MSD, Roche, BMS,

5,

Pfizer Inc; Abbvie, Chugai, MSD, Roche, BMS,

8;

A. Krause,

Abbvie, Roche,

2,

Pfizer Inc, Abbvie, Roche, BMS, MSD,

5,

Pfizer Inc, Abbvie, Roche, BMS, MSD, UCB,

8;

U. Lendl,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

R. Lippe,

Pfizer Inc,

1,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

T. Meng,

Pfizer Inc,

1,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

P. A. Loeschmann,

Pfizer Inc,

1,

Pfizer Inc,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/etanercept-in-mono-therapy-or-in-combination-with-mtx-results-from-a-sub-analysis-of-a-german-non-interventional-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology