ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 233

Engaging Community Stakeholders through a National Lupus Education Workshop

Karen Mancera Cuevas1, Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman2, Sheryl McCalla3, Patricia Canessa4 and Zineb Aouhab1, 1Rheumatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, 2FSM, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, 3American College of Rheumatology, Atlanta, GA, 4Illinois Public Health Association, Springfield, IL

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Community programs, education and health disparities, Leadership, Lupus

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: ARHP Healthcare Disparities in Rheumatology Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

The Popular Opinion Leader (POL) model based on health education theoretical foundations associated with Social Network Theory and Diffusion of Innovation was successfully piloted in several local Hispanic communities. The initial aim of the pilot problem was to develop and teach a core curriculum to address lupus health disparities and a second aim in conjunction, with the American College of Rheumatology and an Office of Minority Health funded grant, 1-CPIMP-151087-01-00 was to disseminate the program as a workshop in May 2016 to engage stakeholders in other targeted communities in the United States that served African American and Native American constituents. The target audience for the curriculum were POLs or Community Health Worker (CHW) equivalents.

Methods:

The multidisciplinary project team who provided training in the POL model included the Project Director who is a rheumatologist, a community Field Director who is a psychologist with cultural competency expertise, a rheumatology trainee, and the POL project manager. The 14 stakeholders who are involved in ongoing lupus health disparities projects participated in the workshop training and they represented a wide range of institutions including community based organizations, academic centers and the ACR. The day long workshop included training of fundamental concepts, curriculum design, application exercises incorporating theory, community practice, and project dissemination adapting culturally-competent practices. Training was done in lecture format and interactive roundtable discussions. Participants completed a qualitative assessment of the workshop at the end of the training sessions.

Results:

Thirteen of fourteen participants responded questions covering workshop purpose and objectives, clarity and appropriateness of the workshop presentation, roundtable interactiveness, participant involvement, use of workshop time, and overall satisfaction. Additionally, open-ended questions were provided on expanding on the workshop strengths and weaknesses, and suggestions/additional comments on this workshop.

All respondents agreed that objectives were clearly stated and that all meeting participants were actively involved and satisfied with the workshop. The majority of respondents reported that the workshop was clear and relevant, that the round table discussions were interactive, and that there was shared decision-making in the workshop. The main shortcoming reported was that there were concerns about effective use of meeting time as some presentations during the workshop were longer than originally programmed.

Conclusion:

The major finding from the workshop is that participants were overall satisfied with their participation, programming of the event, particularly the roundtable discussion activities. Future directions include building on the initial workshop and based on future funding expand the learning experience to lupus-specific stakeholders. In future iterations of the workshop, it will be important to follow-up with program participants to assess program impact.


Disclosure: K. Mancera Cuevas, None; R. Ramsey-Goldman, None; S. McCalla, None; P. Canessa, None; Z. Aouhab, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Mancera Cuevas K, Ramsey-Goldman R, McCalla S, Canessa P, Aouhab Z. Engaging Community Stakeholders through a National Lupus Education Workshop [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/engaging-community-stakeholders-through-a-national-lupus-education-workshop/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/engaging-community-stakeholders-through-a-national-lupus-education-workshop/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology