ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1678

Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacokinetics of Anti-CD40 Antibody Abiprubart in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled 12-week-treatment Proof-of-Concept Study

Eric Jenkins1, Ingrid Louw2, Attila Balog3, Elsa van Duuren4, diane Horowitz5, Janusz Jaworski6, Alan Kivitz7, Ilona Kemplerne Ujfalussy8, Joe Pirrello1, Eben Tessari1, Sheldon Wang1 and John F Paolini1, and KPL-404-C211 Investigators, 1Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Lexington, MA, 2Panorama Medical Centre, Cape Town, South Africa, 3Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary, 4The Sefako Makgatho Health Science University, Pretoria, South Africa, 5Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, New York, NY, 6Reumatika-Centrum Reumatologii, Warszawa, Poland, 7Altoona Center for Clinical Research, Duncansville, PA, 8Medical Centre, Hungarian Defense Forces, Dózsa György út 112, Budapest, Hungary

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), Randomized Trial, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 17, 2024

Title: Abstracts: RA – Treatments: New Approaches

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 1:00PM-2:30PM

Background/Purpose: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients (pts) with inadequate response or intolerance to current biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) have limited options. Abiprubart, a humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody with a stabilized/functionally-silent Fc, binds CD40 and inhibits CD40/CD154 costimulation without lymphocyte depletion. Abiprubart was well-tolerated and showed sustained target engagement and T-cell dependent antibody response suppression in phase 1. These data and abiprubart’s high-concentration liquid formulation support investigation of chronic subcutaneous (SC) administration in autoimmune diseases.  

Methods: This phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled study enrolled [adult] pts with moderate-to-severe active RA with inadequate response or intolerance to ≥1 bDMARD or Janus kinase inhibitor. Participants were randomized in sequential cohorts to 12-week (wk) treatment [Fig 1]. Cohorts 1 & 2 measured safety and PK. Primary efficacy endpoint in Cohorts 3 & 4 was change from baseline (BL) in Disease Activity Score of 28 Joints using C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) at Wk 12. Change from BL at Wk 12 in Rheumatoid Factor (RF) was assessed. Efficacy comparisons used an analysis of covariance model comparing abiprubart groups vs PBO; BL value and randomization stratification as covariates. 

Results: In Cohorts 1 & 2 (n=16) and Cohorts 3 & 4 (n=129) demographics and BL disease activity were balanced. Abiprubart was well tolerated in Cohorts 1 & 2, enabling Cohort 3. In Cohort 3, the least-squares (LS) mean change [95% confidence interval] from BL in DAS28-CRP at Wk 12 in the 5 mg/kg SC qwk group (‑2.17 [‑2.60, ‑1.74], n=27) compared to PBO (‑1.61 [‑2.04, ‑1.17], n=26) was statistically significant (‑0.57, p=0.0470).  In the 5 mg/kg SC q2wk group, the improvement in LS mean change from BL in DAS28-CRP at Wk 12 (‑1.96 [‑2.40, ‑1.52], n=25) vs PBO (‑1.61 [‑2.04, ‑1.17], n=26) did not reach statistical significance (‑0.36, p=0.2124) [Fig 2A]. In Cohort 4, LS mean change from BL in DAS28-CRP at Wk 12 was ‑1.87 [‑2.54, ‑1.21] for abiprubart (400 mg SC q4wk; n=31) vs ‑1.30 [‑1.98, ‑0.62] in PBO (n=20) (‑0.58, p=0.109). Efficacy curves continued to separate until Wk 16 despite treatment cessation at Wk 12. Abiprubart significantly reduced RF (pharmacodynamic marker of CD40 target engagement) by >40% [Fig 2B]. During follow-up, RF levels returned to BL inversely to dose frequency. In a pooled (Cohorts 3 & 4) post-hoc analysis, LS mean change from BL in DAS28-CRP at Wk 12 for abiprubart (‑2.04 [‑2.34, ‑1.74], n=83) vs combined PBO (‑1.52 [‑1.88, ‑1.16], n=46) recipients was statistically significant (-0.52, nominal p=0.010). TEAEs were similar across groups, without dose relatedness; all mild or moderate in severity.

Conclusion: Abiprubart was well-tolerated in pts with b/tsDMARD-refractory RA, and reductions in DAS28-CRP at Wk 12 for all abiprubart groups were greater than PBO, with statistical significance in the 5mg/kg SC qwk dose group and pooled analysis. Abiprubart may provide benefit in autoimmune diseases involving CD40/CD154 costimulation. A phase 2B study [Fig 3] in Sjögren’s Disease is planned.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1: Phase 2 Trial of Abiprubart in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Supporting image 2

Figure 2: A) Change from baseline in DAS28-CRP. B) Change from baseline in Rheumatoid Factor.

Supporting image 3

Figure 3: Phase 2b Sjögren’s Disease Trial Study Design


Disclosures: E. Jenkins: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, 3, 11; I. Louw: AbbVie, 2, 6, Jansson, 2, 6, Lilly, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6; A. Balog: None; E. van Duuren: Abbvie, 2, 6, Adcock-Ingram, 6, Aspen, 2, 6, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, Janssen, 2, 6, Lilly, 6, Mundi-Pharma, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6, Roche, 6; d. Horowitz: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, 5, Pfizer, 5, Set Point Medical, 5; J. Jaworski: None; A. Kivitz: AbbVie, 2, 6, Amgen, 6, 11, Coval, 2, Ecor1, 2, Fresenius Kabi, 2, Genzyme, 12, Scientific ExpertGenzyme, Gilead, 2, 11, GlaxoSmithKlein (GSK), 2, 6, 11, Grunenthal, 2, Horizon, 2, Innovaderm, 2, Janssen, 2, Lilly, 6, Novartis, 11, Pfizer, 6, 11, Prime, 12, Educational, Prometheus, 2, Sanofi - Regeneron, 6, SynAct, 2, Takeda, 2, UCB, 2, 6, XBiotech, 2; I. Kemplerne Ujfalussy: Novartis, 12, Instructor; J. Pirrello: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, 3, 11; E. Tessari: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, 3, 11; S. Wang: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, 3, 11; J. Paolini: Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, 3, 11.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Jenkins E, Louw I, Balog A, van Duuren E, Horowitz d, Jaworski J, Kivitz A, Kemplerne Ujfalussy I, Pirrello J, Tessari E, Wang S, Paolini J. Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacokinetics of Anti-CD40 Antibody Abiprubart in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled 12-week-treatment Proof-of-Concept Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-safety-pharmacokinetics-of-anti-cd40-antibody-abiprubart-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-phase-2-randomized-placebo-controlled-12-week-treatment-proof-of-concept-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-safety-pharmacokinetics-of-anti-cd40-antibody-abiprubart-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-phase-2-randomized-placebo-controlled-12-week-treatment-proof-of-concept-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology