ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0818

Efficacy of XT-150, a Novel Non-Viral Gene Therapy Delivering IL-10v, on Moderate to Severe Pain Due to Osteoarthritis of the Knee: Results of a Phase 2 Trial

Eric Grigsby1, Stephen D. Collins2, Leonard Kapural3, Mark McBride4, Jayson Rieger5, Morgan Stokes6, Howard Rutman6 and Flavia Cicuttini7, 1Neurovations Clinical Research, Napa, CA, 2Xalud Therapeutics, Inc., Chicago, IL, 3Center for Clinical Research, Winston-Salem, NC, 4Instat Clinical Research, Chatham, NJ, 5PBM Capital, Charlottesville, VA, 6Xalud Therapeutics, Inc., Berkeley, CA, 7Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: clinical trial, gene therapy, Interleukins, Osteoarthritis, pain

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 12, 2023

Title: Abstracts: Osteoarthritis I: Clinical Trials

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:00PM-5:30PM

Background/Purpose: Interleukin (IL)-10 is a regulator of cytokine activity and has the potential to restore homeostasis in osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. Unfortunately, relatively short half-life has limited the therapeutic potential of native IL-10 protein.1 The primary objective of this study (NCT04124042) was to establish the safety and tolerability of a single intra-articular (IA) dose of XT-150, a non-viral gene therapy designed to transiently express a proprietary version of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10. The secondary objective was to establish the analgesic efficacy of a single IA dose of XT-150. Exploratory analyses evaluated effects on pain and function following single and repeat doses.

Methods: This was a two-stage double-blind Phase 2 study. Stage A compared 2 active doses of XT-150 to a placebo control arm. Stage B was a 6-month follow-up with the option to randomly receive a single injection of XT-150 at one of two doses (0.15 or 0.45 mg) between Day 180 and Day 330. The dose range was chosen from supportive evidence in previous clinical (XT-150-1-0201 & XT-150-1-0202) and preclinical studies. Participants 45-85 years of age with symptomatic knee OA (defined as a WOMAC Pain score of ≥8 at screening and Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 or 3) were randomized on Day 0 to one of 6 treatment sequences. Injections were completed under imaging guidance to confirm positioning within the joint prior to injection. Screening evaluation took place up to 30 days before enrollment. Efficacy measures were evaluated at baseline and at follow-up visits on Day 7, 30, and monthly thereafter. In Stage A, 286 participants received at least one dose of XT-150 or placebo (phosphate buffered saline) as a single IA injection into the knee. In Stage B, 244 received a second injection, all with XT-150. Separate analyses were conducted for Stages A and B. Stage A analyses included the primary intent to treat (ITT) population to assess the efficacy of XT-150. The primary efficacy outcome measure was at least 30% improvement from Baseline in WOMAC Pain score (obtained from KOOS questionnaire) at Day 180. Stage B analyses included a post hoc modified ITT (mITT) population with a baseline WOMAC Pain score of 9-20. Post hoc analyses in the ITT and mITT populations compared single active doses with repeat active doses.

Results: Demographic data are summarized in Table 1. There was no statistically significant difference in patients achieving at least 30% improvement in WOMAC Pain score between either dose (0.15 mg or 0.45 mg) of XT-150 vs placebo when given as a single dose by Day 180 (Figure 1). Statistically significant changes from baseline WOMAC Pain scores were observed at Day 360 comparing 2 doses of 0.45 mg XT-150 vs 1 dose of placebo followed by 1 dose of 0.45 mg XT-150 in post hoc analyses (p=0.0081, Figure 2). The two-dose regimen of 0.45 mg XT-150 also showed a statistically significant reduction in WOMAC function score at Day 360 vs the single-dose regimen of 0.45 mg XT-150 (p=0.0101).

Conclusion: These data suggest improvement in pain and function with two doses vs one dose of XT-150 and support the future development of repeat doses of XT-150 for the potential treatment of pain from moderate-to-severe knee OA.

1. Kwilasz AJ, et al. Neuropharmacology. 2015;96(Pt A):55-69.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: E. Grigsby: Eli Lilly, 5, Jointstem, 5, Kolon Tissuegene, 5, Medtronic, 2, 5, Neuros, 5, Sollis Therapeutics, 2, Tenex Health Inc., 2, Xalud Therapeutics, 2; S. Collins: Xalud Therapeutics, Inc., 1, 4, 8, 11; L. Kapural: Avanos, 1, 5, Gimer, 1, Nalu, 5, Neuralace, 5, Neuros, 1, Nevro, 1, 5, PainTeq, 1, Presidio, 1, Saluda, 5; M. McBride: None; J. Rieger: Xalud Therapeutics, 4, 8, 10; M. Stokes: Xalud Therapeutics, 3; H. Rutman: Xalud Therapeutics, 3, 11; F. Cicuttini: Xalud Therapeutics, Inc., 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Grigsby E, Collins S, Kapural L, McBride M, Rieger J, Stokes M, Rutman H, Cicuttini F. Efficacy of XT-150, a Novel Non-Viral Gene Therapy Delivering IL-10v, on Moderate to Severe Pain Due to Osteoarthritis of the Knee: Results of a Phase 2 Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-of-xt-150-a-novel-non-viral-gene-therapy-delivering-il-10v-on-moderate-to-severe-pain-due-to-osteoarthritis-of-the-knee-results-of-a-phase-2-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-of-xt-150-a-novel-non-viral-gene-therapy-delivering-il-10v-on-moderate-to-severe-pain-due-to-osteoarthritis-of-the-knee-results-of-a-phase-2-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology