ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2353

Efficacy of Vunakizumab in Reducing Pain in Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Post-Hoc Analysis of a Phase 2/3 Clinical Trial

Jian Xu, Yifan Yang, Shuang Liu, Ru Bai, Shu Li, Guofang Zhang, Xiangyu Wang, Xinyu Xu, Mai Zheng and Daying Feng, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China (People's Republic)

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS), pain, Randomized Trial

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Title: (2338–2376) Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory disease that primarily affects the spine and sacroiliac joints, resulting in significant pain, stiffness, and functional impairment. The interleukin-17 (IL-17) signaling pathway plays a central role in the pathogenesis of AS. Vunakizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting IL-17A, has demonstrated clinical efficacy in a randomized, double-blind, phase 2/3 trial. Since pain is the most common and serious symptom experienced by patients with AS, it is very important to develop and use effective treatment strategies to manage it. This post-hoc analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of vunakizumab in reducing pain outcomes in patients with active AS.

Methods: Eligible participants were adults with active AS, diagnosed according to the modified New York criteria (1984 revision), who had an inadequate response to, intolerance of, or contraindications to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). All patients included in this study fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria. In phase 2, patients were randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio to receive either 120 mg or 240 mg of vunakizumab, or placebo. At week 16, patients initially receiving placebo were re-randomized 1:1 to one of the treatment groups. In phase 3, patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive 120 mg of vunakizumab or placebo. Study drug was administered at weeks 0, 2, 4, 8, and 12, followed by dosing every four weeks through week 32. Pain outcomes included total back pain, nocturnal back pain, and questions 2–4 from the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI): spinal pain (pain in the back, neck, or hip), peripheral joint pain/swelling, and enthesitis (pain in areas tender to touch).

Results: This post-hoc analysis demonstrated significant reductions in all five pain outcome scores for patients receiving vunakizumab 120 mg compared to placebo over the 16-week period (all nominal p < 0.0001 by repeated measures mixed-effects model; Figure 1). Specifically, at week 16, the vunakizumab group showed a mean reduction in total back pain of -2.89 versus -1.83 in the placebo group (nominal p < 0.0001). Similar significant improvements were observed in nocturnal back pain (-3.06 vs. -1.76, nominal p < 0.0001), spinal pain (-2.95 vs. -2.03, nominal p < 0.0001), peripheral joint pain/swelling (-2.13 vs. -1.25, nominal p = 0.0001), and enthesitis (-2.94 vs. -1.80, nominal p < 0.0001) (Table 1). From weeks 16 to 32, patients initially assigned to placebo who switched to vunakizumab 120 mg at week 16 experienced accelerated reductions in all five pain outcomes after the switch, although the magnitude of improvement remained slightly less than that observed in patients who received continuous vunakizumab throughout the study.

Conclusion: Vunakizumab provided statistically significant and clinically meaningful reductions in pain outcomes in patients with active AS. Importantly, patients who switched from placebo to vunakizumab at week 16 experienced rapid pain improvement, supporting vunakizumab as an effective treatment strategy for managing pain in AS.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2


Disclosures: J. Xu: None; Y. Yang: None; S. Liu: None; R. Bai: None; S. Li: None; G. Zhang: None; X. Wang: None; X. Xu: None; M. Zheng: None; D. Feng: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Xu J, Yang Y, Liu S, Bai R, Li S, Zhang G, Wang X, Xu X, Zheng M, Feng D. Efficacy of Vunakizumab in Reducing Pain in Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Post-Hoc Analysis of a Phase 2/3 Clinical Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-of-vunakizumab-in-reducing-pain-in-ankylosing-spondylitis-a-post-hoc-analysis-of-a-phase-2-3-clinical-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-of-vunakizumab-in-reducing-pain-in-ankylosing-spondylitis-a-post-hoc-analysis-of-a-phase-2-3-clinical-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology