ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1427

Efficacy of Upadacitinib in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Stratified by Involvement of Weight-bearing Joint Regions: A Post Hoc Subgroup Analysis of the Phase 3, Randomized, SELECT-PsA 1 and SELECT-PsA 2 Trials

Kristi Mizelle1, William R Tillett2, Mira Ali3, Thomas Iyile3, Tianming Gao3, Arathi Setty3, Jessica A Walsh4 and Laura Coates5, 1Tidewater Physicians Multispecialty Group, Newport News, VA, 2Department of Rheumatology, Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Bath, United Kingdom, 3AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL, 4Salt Lake City Veterans Affairs Health and University of Utah Health, Division of Rheumatology, Salt Lake City, UT, 5University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: pain, Patient reported outcomes, Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 13, 2023

Title: (1412–1441) Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment Poster II: SpA

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Involvement of weight-bearing joints in patients with PsA can be associated with reduced activities of daily living and quality of life. Upadacitinib (UPA) is an oral JAK inhibitor approved for the treatment of active PsA in adults. In the SELECT-PsA 1 and SELECT‑PsA 2 trials, treatment with once daily UPA 15 mg (UPA15) or 30 mg (UPA30) resulted in greater improvements in the number of swollen and tender joints as well as other patient- and physician-reported outcomes when compared with placebo.1–3 The objective of this post hoc analysis was to evaluate the long-term efficacy of UPA in patients with PsA and involvement in 1 or more regions of weight-bearing joints.

Methods: The SELECT-PsA 1 and SELECT-PsA 2 phase 3, randomized, controlled trials enrolled patients ≥ 18 years old with active PsA and intolerance or inadequate response to ≥ 1 nonbiologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD; SELECT-PsA 1) or biologic DMARD (SELECT-PsA 2). This post hoc analysis of the 2 phase 3 trials stratified patients with involvement in 1 to 6 regions of weight-bearing joints (hips, knees, ankles, midfoot, metatarsophalangeal [MTP], or proximal interphalangeal [PIP]) who were randomized at baseline to receive either UPA15, placebo (PBO), or adalimumab (ADA; only in SELECT-PsA 1); at week 24, PBO‑treated patients switched to UPA15 (PBO/UPA15). This analysis did not include patients who received UPA30 or PBO/UPA30. A mixed-effects model with repeated measures was used to analyze the change from baseline to week 104 in 4 patient-reported outcome measures (pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index [HAQ-DI], Work Productivity and Activity Impairment [WPAI] questionnaire, and EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level [EQ-5D-5L]) and 1 composite outcome measure (Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis [DAPSA]). UPA safety results in patients with PsA have been previously reported.1–3

Results: A total of 1069 patients from the SELECT-PsA 1 trial and 317 patients from the SELECT-PsA 2 trial were included in the pooled analysis. Of all patients with any involvement in regions of weight-bearing joints, > 91% of patients had involvement in ≥ 2 regions. The most common weight-bearing joints with involvement were the PIP (SELECT-PsA 1, 79.8%; SELECT-PsA 2, 84.5%), MTP (71.1%; 73.8%), and knee (62.3%; 64.9%) joints. Improvements from baseline to week 104 were observed with UPA15 treatment in patient-reported outcomes of pain, HAQ-DI, WPAI, EQ-5D-5L, and the DAPSA score across all subgroups of patients with involvement in 1 to 6 regions of weight-bearing joints (Figure). In general, the magnitude of improvement in outcome scores with UPA15 was greater in patients with involvement in a higher number of regions. Similar improvements from baseline to week 104 in outcome scores were observed in patients who received PBO/UPA15 or ADA to week 104.

Conclusion: UPA15 treatment was associated with long-term improvements in pain, disability, work productivity, disease activity, and quality of life in patients with PsA and involvement in 1 or more regions of weight-bearing joints.

References:

  1. McInnes IB, et al. N Engl J Med. 2021;384;1227-39.
  2. McInnes IB, et al. RMD Open. 2021;7:e001838.
  3. Mease PJ, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022;80:312-20.

Supporting image 1


Disclosures: K. Mizelle: AbbVie, 2, 6, Amgen, 6, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 6, Janssen, 6, Pfizer, 6, UCB, 2; W. Tillett: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Celgene, 2, 5, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 6, GSK, 2, 5, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, MSD, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Ovo Pharma, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, UCB Pharma, 2, 5, 6; M. Ali: AbbVie, 3, 11; T. Iyile: AbbVie/Abbott, 3, 11; T. Gao: AbbVie, 3, 11; A. Setty: AbbVie, 3, 11; J. Walsh: AbbVie, 5, Amgen, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Janssen, 2, Merck, 5, Novartis, 2, Pfizer, 2, 5, UCB Pharma, 2; L. Coates: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Biogen, 6, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, Celgene, 2, 5, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 6, Galapagos, 2, 6, Gilead Sciences, 2, 6, GSK, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Medac, 6, MoonLake, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Mizelle K, Tillett W, Ali M, Iyile T, Gao T, Setty A, Walsh J, Coates L. Efficacy of Upadacitinib in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Stratified by Involvement of Weight-bearing Joint Regions: A Post Hoc Subgroup Analysis of the Phase 3, Randomized, SELECT-PsA 1 and SELECT-PsA 2 Trials [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-of-upadacitinib-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-stratified-by-involvement-of-weight-bearing-joint-regions-a-post-hoc-subgroup-analysis-of-the-phase-3-randomized-select-psa-1-and-selec/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-of-upadacitinib-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-stratified-by-involvement-of-weight-bearing-joint-regions-a-post-hoc-subgroup-analysis-of-the-phase-3-randomized-select-psa-1-and-selec/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology