ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1363

Efficacy of Secukinumab on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis Stratified by Prior Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Use: Post Hoc Analysis from a Phase 3 Trial

Vibeke Strand1, Gurjit Kaeley2, Martin Bergman3, Dafna Gladman4, Laura Coates5, Peter Hur6, Nina Kim7, Bhumik Parikh6, Patricia Pertel8 and Philip Mease9, 1Division of Immunology/Rheumatology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, 2University of Florida College of Medicine - Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, 3Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, 4Krembil Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 5University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 6Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, 7The University of Texas at Austin; Baylor Scott and White Health, Austin, TX, 8Novartis AG, Basel, Switzerland, 9Seattle Rheumatology Associates, P.L.L.C., Seattle, WA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Biologicals, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Patient reported outcomes, Psoriatic arthritis, SF36

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2020

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The phase 3 randomized controlled trial FUTURE 5 (NCT02404350) showed the efficacy of secukinumab (SEC) improving clinical signs, symptoms, and radiographic progression in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA).1 This post hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy of SEC improving patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi)-naive and inadequate-responder (TNFi-IR) patients with PsA.

Methods: FUTURE 5 enrolled patients ≥ 18 years who met CASPAR with symptoms for ≥ 6 months at screening. Patients were randomized to receive SEC 300 mg, 150 mg, 150 mg no load (NL), or placebo (PBO) weekly from baseline to week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter to week 16. Patients in the SEC 150 mg NL arm received PBO at weeks 1, 2, and 3. For this post hoc analysis, patients were stratified by prior TNFi use. PROs were assessed at baseline and selected visits through week 16. Mean changes from baseline in PROs and the proportions of patients reporting improvements ≥ minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs) and scores ≥ age/gender-matched normative values were assessed in each treatment group. PROs included patient global assessments of disease activity (PtGA) and psoriasis and arthritis (PtGA PsO/arthritis) visual analog scale (VAS), pain VAS, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)–Fatigue, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI; patients with psoriasis only).

Results: Baseline PRO scores were generally worse in the TNFi-IR vs TNFi-naive population. TNFi-naive and TNFi-IR patients in all SEC treatment groups reported significantly greater improvements in PtGA, PtGA PsO/arthritis, pain, HAQ-DI, SF-36 physical component summary (PCS), and DLQI at week 16 vs PBO. Treatment responses were higher in the SEC 300-mg arm vs SEC 150-mg and 150-mg NL arms at week 16 across most PROs, including all SF-36 domains (Figure 1). Significantly higher proportions of both TNFi-naive and TNFi-IR patients receiving SEC reported improvements ≥ MCID as early as week 1 in HAQ-DI and at week 16 across all PROs except SF-36 mental component summary score vs PBO. The proportions of patients reporting improvement ≥ MCID in pain and HAQ-DI (Figure 2), as well as PtGA PsO/arthritis, SF-36 PCS, and DLQI, were higher in TNFi-naive than TNFi-IR patients. More SEC-treated patients reported scores ≥ normative values in HAQ-DI, SF-36 PCS, and FACIT-Fatigue at week 16 vs PBO, with more patients in the TNFi-naive than the TNFi-IR sub-population reporting scores ≥ normative values (Figure 3).

Conclusion: Initiation of SEC as a first-line biologic in patients with PsA resulted in early, statistically significant, and clinically meaningful improvements in PROs across all doses, and significant and meaningful improvements in TNFi-IR patients as later-line therapy. Treatment responses were higher in patients receiving SEC 300 mg vs 150 mg or 150 mg NL. TNFi-naive patients more frequently reported improvements ≥ MCID and scores ≥ normative values vs TNFi-IR patients, although TNFi-IR patients had lower baseline PRO scores and reported lower PBO responses.

Reference:

1. Mease P, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:890-7.


Disclosure: V. Strand, AbbVie, 5, Amgen, 5, Celltrion, 5, Janssen, 5, Merck, 5, Novartis, 5, Regeneron, 5, Sanofi, 5, UCB, 5, Genentech/Roche, 5, GSK, 5, Pfizer, 5, Bayer, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, Galapagos, 5, Lilly, 5, Gilead, 5, Samsung, 5, Servier, 5, Setpoint, 5, Arena, 5, AstraZeneca, 5, Horizon, 5, Ichnos, 5, Inmedix, 5, Sandoz, 5; G. Kaeley, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, 5; M. Bergman, AbbVie, 5, 8, Amgen, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, 8, Genentech/Roche, 5, 8, Gilead, 5, 8, Janssen, 5, 8, Merck, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Regeneron, 5, 8, Sanofi, 5, 8, Sandoz, 5, 8, JNJ (parent of Janssen), 1; D. Gladman, AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, Gilead, 5, Galapagos, 5, Celgene, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5; L. Coates, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Celgene, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, Amgen Inc., 5, 8, Gilead, 5, 8, Janssen, 5, 8, UCB Pharma, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Biogen, 8, Medac, 8, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, MSD, 5; P. Hur, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, 3; N. Kim, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, 9; B. Parikh, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, 3; P. Pertel, Novartis AG, 3; P. Mease, Amgen, 2, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, 8, Sun, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5, 8, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Gilead, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Galapagos, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Strand V, Kaeley G, Bergman M, Gladman D, Coates L, Hur P, Kim N, Parikh B, Pertel P, Mease P. Efficacy of Secukinumab on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis Stratified by Prior Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Use: Post Hoc Analysis from a Phase 3 Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-of-secukinumab-on-patient-reported-outcomes-in-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis-stratified-by-prior-tumor-necrosis-factor-inhibitor-use-post-hoc-analysis-from-a-phase-3-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-of-secukinumab-on-patient-reported-outcomes-in-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis-stratified-by-prior-tumor-necrosis-factor-inhibitor-use-post-hoc-analysis-from-a-phase-3-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology