ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2344

Efficacy of Mycophenolate Mofetil in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis Associated Interstitial Lung Disease

Jonathan Amos1, Jennifer Kendall 1, Robyn Moran 2, Megan Krause 3, Paul Schmidt 4, Chase Hall 5, Mark Hamblin 6 and Mehrdad Maz 7, 1University of Kansas Medical Center, Division of Rheumatology, KANSAS CITY, KS, 2University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, 3University of Kansas, KANSAS CITY, KS, 4University of Kansas Medical Center, Division of Rheumatology, Kansas City, 5University of Kansas Medical Center, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, KANSAS CITY, 6University of Kansas Medical Center, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Kansas City, KS, 7The University of Kansas Medical Center, KANSAS CITY, KS

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: interstitial lung disease, mycophenolate mofetil, Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), rituximab and ILD

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Title: RA – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster III: Comorbidities

Session Type: Poster Session (Tuesday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) as an extra-articular manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) leads to significant morbidity and mortality.  As data is limited, this study aims to investigate the efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in the treatment of RA associated ILD.

Methods: This retrospective chart review identified patients with a clinical diagnosis of RA and ILD at a single tertiary academic medical center who were treated with MMF for at least 3 months between 1/01/2005 and 12/31/2018. Patients were identified by diagnosis codes, then reviewed to confirm clinical diagnoses and to collect data on concurrent therapies, pulmonary function, infections and hospitalizations.

Results: Twenty six patients were identified; 17 female (65.4%) and 23 Caucasian (88.5%) with a mean age of 57.8 at the time of diagnosis of RA. RF was positive in 20 (76.9%), ACPA in 16 (61.5%) and 10 (38.5%) were seropositive for both, while 3 (11.5%) patients were seronegative.  The mean time to diagnosis of ILD after diagnosis of RA was 40.6 months with a range of -50 to 504 months.  Seven (26.9%) patients had an ILD diagnosis prior to RA.

Fourteen (53.8%) patients had usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), 5 (19.2%) nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), 3 (11.5%) organizing pneumonia (OP), and 4 (15.4%) had other forms such as mixed UIP and NSIP.  The average duration of MMF therapy was 24.9 months with an average maximum daily dose of 2163.5mg.  Eleven (42.3%) patients were concurrently on rituximab (RTX), 1 (3.85%) on methotrexate, 1 (3.85%) on certolizumab, and 1 (3.85%) on sulfasalazine.  Fifteen (57.7%) patients were on prednisone ≥10mg daily and 6 (23.1%) were on < 10mg daily for at least one month.

Average FVC for all patients was 62.4 ± 21.9% predicted at the time of initiation of MMF, 61.9% ± 23.0 predicted at 6 months (p=0.95), and 64.8% ± 25.9 predicted at 12 months (p=0.67). In aggregate, 13 (50%) patients on MMF had stable or improved FVC over the 12-month period, of whom 6/13 (46.2%) were on concurrent RTX. Six of 11 (54.5%) patients on combination MMF and RTX had stable or improved FVC over the 12-month period.

There were 26 hospitalizations in 8 (30.8%) patients; 17 (65.4%) for infections, 3 (11.5%) for respiratory failure, and 6 (23.1%) for cardiovascular events. Twenty four (92.3%) hospitalizations were in the combination MMF and RTX treatment group, including all infection related admissions. There were 10 outpatient infections treated with antimicrobials. There were 8 (30.8%) deaths; 6 were in the MMF and RTX combination group.  Two deaths were from infection and ILD, 2 from infection, 2 from cardiac disease, 1 from ILD, and 1 from myasthenia gravis crisis.

Conclusion: In this cohort of 26 RA patients with ILD, treatment with MMF as mono or combination therapy with RTX was associated with a stable or improved FVC in 50% of patients at 12-month. About 55% of patients on combination MMF and RTX showed stability or improvement in FVC. Patients treated with MMF compared to combination MMF and RTX had similar FVC values at the end of the study period, however, the combination therapy had more hospital admissions and infections. Further studies are needed to better understand the efficacy and safety of MMF or combination therapy with RTX in RA associated ILD.

Boxplot diagram showing the FVC percent predicted for all patients at the time of initiation of mycophenolate mofetil, at 6 months, and at 12 months.

Boxplot diagram showing the comparison of the FVC percent predicted for patients on MMF without rituximab, compared to patients on combination therapy with mycophenolate mofetil and rituximab, at the time of initiation of mycophenolate mofetil, at 6 months, and at 12 months.


Disclosure: J. Amos, None; J. Kendall, None; R. Moran, None; M. Krause, None; P. Schmidt, None; C. Hall, None; M. Hamblin, None; M. Maz, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Amos J, Kendall J, Moran R, Krause M, Schmidt P, Hall C, Hamblin M, Maz M. Efficacy of Mycophenolate Mofetil in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis Associated Interstitial Lung Disease [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-of-mycophenolate-mofetil-in-the-treatment-of-rheumatoid-arthritis-associated-interstitial-lung-disease/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-of-mycophenolate-mofetil-in-the-treatment-of-rheumatoid-arthritis-associated-interstitial-lung-disease/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology