ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1438

Efficacy of Guselkumab in Early-Onset and Late-Onset Psoriatic Arthritis: Post Hoc Pooled Analyses of Two Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trials in Patients with Active PsA

Enrique Soriano1, Mitsumasa Kishimoto2, Emmanouil Rampakakis3, Francois Nantel4, May Shawi5, Frederic Lavie6, Philip J. Mease7 and Dafna Gladman8, 1Rheumatology Section, Internal Medicine Services, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, and University Institute Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2Kyorin University School of Medicine, Yokohoma, Japan, 3McGill University, Department of Pediatrics / JSS Medical Research, Scientific Affairs, Montreal, QC, Canada, 4Nantel Medsci Consult, Consultant, Montreal, QC, Canada, 5Immunology, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Titusville, NJ, 6The Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Paris, France, 7Swedish Medical Center/Providence St. Joseph Health and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, 8Schroeder Arthritis Institute, Krembil Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: clinical trial, Disease Activity, Outcome measures, Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 13, 2023

Title: (1412–1441) Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment Poster II: SpA

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Late-onset PsA may be associated with elevated acute phase reactants, higher joint count, and erosive disease at diagnosis1,2. Given potential phenotype differences and increasing prevalence with aging populations, it is important to establish the efficacy of current treatments in late-onset PsA. Previous analyses of DISCOVER-1&2 (D1&2) have shown the fully human IL-23p19-subunit inhibitor guselkumab (GUS) to be associated with robust and sustained improvement in PsA signs/symptoms over 52 weeks (W) in subgroups of patients (pts) across a variety of baseline (BL) characteristics3. These post hoc analyses contrasted early- vs. late-onset PsA pts and evaluated GUS efficacy through W52 in both cohorts.

Methods: Adults in D1&2 (90% bionaive) with active PsA despite standard therapies were randomized 1:1:1 to GUS 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W); GUS 100 mg at W0, W4, Q8W; or placebo (PBO) with crossover to GUS 100 mg Q4W at W24. The tertile (T) distribution of age at PsA diagnosis in the pooled D1&D2 population informed the definition of early- (T1 < 36y) and late- (T3 ≥47y) onset. W24/52 efficacy assessments included least-square mean changes in Disease Activity Index for PsA (DAPSA), swollen/tender joint counts (SJC/TJC), Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI; in pts with BSA≥3% and IGA≥2 at BL), CRP, pt-reported pain (Pt-Pain), pt global assessment of arthritis and psoriasis (PtGA), Short Form 36-item physical component summary score (SF-36 PCS), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI; in pts with axial involvement [axPsA]), and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS; in pts with axPsA), as well as ACR and Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) response rates (employing non-responder imputation [NRI] for missing data).

Results: Relative to pts with late-onset (n=384), those with early-onset (n=376) PsA were significantly younger at BL but had longer PsA duration and a shorter interval between psoriasis and PsA diagnoses (Table 1). The two cohorts had generally comparable joint and skin disease severity at BL, although those with early-onset PsA were more likely to have axPsA and dactylitis, and exhibited higher CRP levels, PtGA, BASDAI and ASDAS.

Irrespective of PsA onset age, GUS Q4W or Q8W was associated with significantly (nominal p< 0.001) greater improvements in DAPSA, PASI, PtGA, CRP, ASDAS (Figure 1), SJC, TJC, Pt-Pain, BASDAI, and SF-36 PCS (data not shown), and higher ACR20/50/70 and MDA response rates vs. PBO at W24 (Figure 2). Further improvements/increased response rates were generally seen through W52 of GUS across early- and late-onset subgroups (Figure 1, 2).

Conclusion: Results of post hoc analyses, conducted in a large cohort of mainly bio-naïve pts with active PsA from D1&2, suggest early-onset PsA may be associated with more aggressive presentation several years post-diagnosis. Irrespective of age of PsA onset and differences in baseline profile, however, GUS was associated with significant and clinically meaningful improvements across key PsA domains, with further enhancements generally seen through W52.

References:
1. Fragoulis GE. J Rheumatol 2022;49:1085
2. Polachek A. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2019;48:834
3. Ritchlin CT. RMD Open 2022;8:e002195

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: E. Soriano: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 6, Eli Lilly, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 5, 6, Roche, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 5, 6; M. Kishimoto: AbbVie, 2, 6, Amgen, 2, 6, Asahi-Kasei Pharma, 2, 6, Astellas, 2, 6, Ayumi Pharma, 2, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, 6, Celgene, 2, 6, Chugai, 2, 6, Daiichi-Sankyo, 2, 6, Eisai, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Gilead, 2, 6, Janssen, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 6, Ono Pharma, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, 2, 6, UCB, 2, 6; E. Rampakakis: Janssen, 2, JSS Medical Research, Inc, 3; F. Nantel: Janssen, 2, Johnson & Johnson, 11; M. Shawi: Immunology Global Medical Affairs, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 11; F. Lavie: Janssen, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 11; P. Mease: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Acelyrin, 2, Aclaris, 2, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 6, Galapagos, 2, Gilead, 2, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, Inmagene, 2, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, MoonLake Pharma, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Sun Pharma, 2, 5, UCB Pharma, 2, 5, 6, Ventyx, 2, Xinthera, 2; D. Gladman: AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, Celgene, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Galapagos, 2, Gilead Sciences, 2, Janssen, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Soriano E, Kishimoto M, Rampakakis E, Nantel F, Shawi M, Lavie F, Mease P, Gladman D. Efficacy of Guselkumab in Early-Onset and Late-Onset Psoriatic Arthritis: Post Hoc Pooled Analyses of Two Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trials in Patients with Active PsA [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-of-guselkumab-in-early-onset-and-late-onset-psoriatic-arthritis-post-hoc-pooled-analyses-of-two-phase-3-randomized-controlled-trials-in-patients-with-active-psa/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-of-guselkumab-in-early-onset-and-late-onset-psoriatic-arthritis-post-hoc-pooled-analyses-of-two-phase-3-randomized-controlled-trials-in-patients-with-active-psa/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology