ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1868

Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Patients with Non-Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis Treated with Certolizumab Pegol: Results from the First 52-Week Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study (NCT02552212)

Atul A. Deodhar1, Lianne S. Gensler2, Jonathan Kay3, Walter P. Maksymowych4, Nigil Haroon5, Robert B.M. Landewé6, Martin Rudwaleit7, Stephen Hall8, Lars Bauer9, Bengt Hoepken9, Natasha de Peyrecave10, Brian Kilgallen11 and Désirée van der Heijde12, 1Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, 2University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 3Division of Rheumatology, University of Massachusetts Medical School and UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA, 4Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 5University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 6Amsterdam Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology Center and Zuyderland Medical Center, Amsterdam; Heerlen, Netherlands, 7Department of Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, Klinikum Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany, 8Cabrini Medical Centre, Cabrini Private Hospital, Malvern, Australia, 9UCB Pharma, Monheim, Germany, 10UCB Pharma, Brussels, Belgium, 11UCB Pharma, Raleigh, NC, 12Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: axial spondyloarthritis, certolizumab pegol, non-radiographic, outcomes and safety

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 22, 2018

Title: 4M089 ACR Abstract: Spondyloarthritis Incl PsA–Clinical III: Treatment of Axial SpA (1864–1869)

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose: In the USA, certolizumab pegol (CZP) is approved for treatment of adults with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and not for non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA). The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) expressed concerns that the natural history of nr-axSpA is poorly understood, with potential for spontaneous remission. C-axSpAnd was initiated, following FDA recommendations, to assess CZP efficacy vs conventional standard of care treatment in patients (pts) with active nr-axSpA and objective signs of inflammation (OSI) during a 52-week (wk) placebo (PBO)-controlled study.

Methods:

C-axSpAnd (NCT02552212) was a 52-wk, phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, PBO-controlled study. Pts were randomized 1:1 to PBO or CZP (400 mg at Weeks 0, 2, and 4, then 200 mg every 2 wks) and stratified by sacroiliitis on MRI and C-reactive protein (CRP) at baseline (BL) and region. Pts were ≥18 years with OSI (elevated CRP and/or positive MRI of the sacroiliac [SI] joint), symptom duration ≥12 months, documented diagnosis of axSpA and met ASAS (but not modified New York) classification criteria. Randomized pts could switch to open-label (OL) CZP treatment or alternative OL treatment at any time, and concomitant medication could be adjusted at any point during the trial. The primary efficacy variable was Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score Major Improvement (ASDAS-MI; defined as ASDAS decrease from BL ≥2.0 points or reaching lowest possible value) at Wk52. ASAS40 Wk12 response was assessed as the first secondary variable.

  Results: 317 pts were randomized (PBO: 158, CZP: 159; Table). At Wk52, ASDAS-MI response was shown in 47.2% CZP vs 7.0% PBO pts (p-value: <0.001; Figure). All sensitivity analyses supported the primary outcome. Rapid improvement (ASDAS-MI Wk2 response) was observed in 20.8% CZP vs 1.3% PBO pts. ASAS40 response was reached in 47.8% CZP vs 11.4% PBO pts at Wk12. 60.8% PBO pts escaped to OL CZP vs 12.6% CZP pts by Wk52. No new safety signal was identified.

  Conclusion: C-axSpAnd is the first study to assess efficacy of an anti-TNF in nr-axSpA using a 52-wk, PBO-controlled period. Clinically relevant and statistically significant improvements were seen in CZP vs PBO pts. This study shows clear evidence for the limitations of current standard of care to provide adequate disease control in nr-axSpA pts.

This study was funded by UCB Pharma, medical writing by Eleanor Thurtle, Costello Medical, UK.

Table/Figure

 

 

 


Disclosure: A. A. Deodhar, Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, 2, 5; L. S. Gensler, UCB Pharma, 2; J. Kay, Eli Lilly, Gilead, UCB Pharma, 2,Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celltrion Healthcare, Janssen, Merck, Roche, Samsung Bioepis, Sandoz, 5,Pfizer, 2, 5; W. P. Maksymowych, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, 2, 5; N. Haroon, AbbVie, Amgen, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, UCB Pharma, 5; R. B. M. Landewé, AbbVie, Ablynx, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Centocor, Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline, Jansen, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Schering, UCB Pharma, 2, 5; M. Rudwaleit, AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, 5; S. Hall, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, UCB Pharma, 2, 5; L. Bauer, UCB Pharma, 3; B. Hoepken, UCB Pharma, 3; N. de Peyrecave, UCB Pharma, 3; B. Kilgallen, UCB Pharma, 3; D. van der Heijde, Imaging Rheumatology BV, 3,AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Daiichi, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, UCB Pharma, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Deodhar AA, Gensler LS, Kay J, Maksymowych WP, Haroon N, Landewé RBM, Rudwaleit M, Hall S, Bauer L, Hoepken B, de Peyrecave N, Kilgallen B, van der Heijde D. Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Patients with Non-Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis Treated with Certolizumab Pegol: Results from the First 52-Week Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study (NCT02552212) [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-outcomes-in-patients-with-non-radiographic-axial-spondyloarthritis-treated-with-certolizumab-pegol-results-from-the-first-52-week-randomized-placebo-controlled-study-nct02552212/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-outcomes-in-patients-with-non-radiographic-axial-spondyloarthritis-treated-with-certolizumab-pegol-results-from-the-first-52-week-randomized-placebo-controlled-study-nct02552212/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology