ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2856

Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab in Psoriatic Arthritis Patients with Spondylarthritis As Well As  Peripheral Arthritis: Results from 2 Phase 3, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

Arthur Kavanaugh1, Luis Puig2, Alice B. Gottlieb3, Christopher T. Ritchlin4, Yin You5, Shu Li5, Michael Song5, Bruce Randazzo5, Proton Rahman6 and Iain. B. McInnes7, 1University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 2Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 3Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, 4Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatololgy Division, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, 5Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, 6Rheumatology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St Johns, NF, Canada, 7Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medicine, Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Arthritis, Psoriatic arthritis and spondylarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis - Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster III: Therapy

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: To evaluate ustekinumab(UST) in a
subgroup of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) pts with physician diagnosed spondylarthritis,
as well as peripheral arthritis, from the PSUMMIT 1 & 2 trials.

Methods: Adult PsA pts with active disease were
randomized to UST45mg, 90mg, or PBO at wks 0,4, and q12wks, thereafter. PBO-pts
crossed over to UST45mg at wks24 and 28 followed by q12wk dosing. At wk16, pts
with <5% improvement in TJC & SJC entered blinded early escape [EE]. This
post hoc analysis evaluated efficacy and safety in the subgroup of PsA patients
with physician diagnosed spondylarthritis at baseline from the PSUMMIT trials (PSUMMIT
1 [bio-naïve] and PSUMMIT 2 [bio-naïve and bio-experienced]). BASDAI scores were
collected at baseline and wks12 and 24; BASDAI question (#2) related to overall
level of axial disease neck, back or hip pain was also assessed separately.

Results: 256 (28% of PSUMMIT 1 &2 population, including
32 bio-experienced) randomized pts (92 PBO, 164 UST combined) had spondylarthritis
at baseline. In this sub-group 80.5% had enthesitis and 51.6% had dactylitis at
baseline; in the overall population, 71.4% and 45.6% had enthesitis and
dactylitis, respectively. Consistent with the overall population, at baseline,
about 50% of patients used MTX, 77% NSAIDs, and 20.7% low dose oral
corticosteroids. More UST-treated pts achieved
BASDAI20/50/70 responses vs PBO at wk24(Table). The observed changes in the median
score of the BASDAI question related to the overall level of axial disease
neck, back or hip pain were also similar to the total BASDAI score changes for
both groups, -0.45 vs -1.65,  between PBO and combined UST groups,
respectively. Other clinical efficacy and
radiographic progression data in this subgroup are summarized (Table). During
the PBO-controlled period, AE rates for PBO vs combined UST-treated groups were
41.3% vs 34.8%; SAEs were 2.2% vs 1.2% discontinuations due to AEs were 3.3% vs
0.6%; and infections were 16.3% vs 13.4%). Through 1yr, safety was consistent
with the overall PsA population.

Conclusion: In this post-hoc analysis, UST significantly
improved axial symptoms in a subgroup of PsA patients who also had physician
diagnosed spondylarthritis. Reponses in other PsA domains and safety were similar
to that observed in the overall PsA study population.

 

Table:  PSUMMIT 1 and 2-Efficacy Outcomes in Patients with Spondylitis and Peripheral Joint Involvement at Baseline (BL)

 

Wk 24

Wk 52

 

PBO

UST Combined

PBO→ 45mg

UST Combined

 

92

164

81

156

BASDAI20/50/70†

N=92

32.9%/11.4%/0%

N=164

54.8%/29.3%/15.3%

–

–

Change in BASDAI score (median)

N=92

-0.51

N=164

-1.60

–

–

Mean % change (median) from BL entheses score (MASES index)*

N=63

-16.01(-26.67)

N=132

-46.66(-50.00)

P=0.017

N=60

-53.06(-87.50)

N=127

-54.76(-73.33)

Mean % change(median) from BL dactylitis score**

N=41

-11.03(0.00)

N=83

-57.48(-88.89)

P<0.001

N=39

-69.76(-100.00)

N=82

-68.94(-100.00)

ACR20 /ACR50/ ACR70 (%)

N=92

22.8/3.3/1.1

N=164

43.9^/25.6/11.0

^P=0.001

N=81

65.4/39.5/16.0

N=156

62.8/34.6/19.2

Mean (SD) change from BL HAQ-DI

N=92

-0.11(0.39)

N=164

-0.33(0.53)

P<0.001

N=81

-0.39(0.42)

N=156

-0.37(0.55)

PASI 75 response***

N=69

11.6%

N=137

63.5%

P<0.001

N=61

65.6%

N=129

70.5%

Total vdH-S mean change from BL (peripheral joints)

1.51(6.41)

0.00(1.69)

P=0.003

3.04(11.86)

0.25(2.13)

Pts who did
not receive UST excluded. †BASDAI not collected at wk 52 ^ACR20 only, *enthesitis and dactylitis **with spondylitis
and peripheral joint involvement at BL; *** pts with ≥3% BSA
psoriasis involvement with spondylitis and peripheral joint involvement at BL

 


Disclosure: A. Kavanaugh, Janssen R & D, LLC, 2; L. Puig, Janssen R & D, LLC, 2; A. B. Gottlieb, Janssen R & D, LLC, 2; C. T. Ritchlin, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 2; Y. You, Janssen R & D, LLC, 3; S. Li, Janssen R & D, LLC, 3; M. Song, Janssen R & D, LLC, 3; B. Randazzo, Janssen R & D, LLC, 3; P. Rahman, Janssen R & D, LLC, 2; I. B. McInnes, Janssen R & D, LLC, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kavanaugh A, Puig L, Gottlieb AB, Ritchlin CT, You Y, Li S, Song M, Randazzo B, Rahman P, McInnes IB. Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab in Psoriatic Arthritis Patients with Spondylarthritis As Well As  Peripheral Arthritis: Results from 2 Phase 3, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-ustekinumab-in-psoriatic-arthritis-patients-with-spondylarthritis-as-well-as-peripheral-arthritis-results-from-2-phase-3-multicenter-double-blind-placebo-controlled-st/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-ustekinumab-in-psoriatic-arthritis-patients-with-spondylarthritis-as-well-as-peripheral-arthritis-results-from-2-phase-3-multicenter-double-blind-placebo-controlled-st/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology